BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 39
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 14, 2009

                   ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE
                            Jared William Huffman, Chair
                     AB 39 (Huffman) - As Amended:  April 2, 2009
          
          SUBJECT  :   Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: Plan

           SUMMARY  :   Requires development of a new plan for the  
          Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (Delta).  Specifically,  this bill  :   


          1)Requires the California Water and Ecosystem Council to develop  
            a plan to implement the Delta Vision Strategic Plan issued by  
            the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force.

          2)Requires submission of the plan to the Legislature before  
            January 1, 2011. 

          3)Provides for definition of unspecified terms.

           EXISTING LAW  requires the Secretary of the Natural Resources  
          Agency to develop a strategic plan for the Delta, and authorizes  
          various state agencies, including the California Bay-Delta  
          Authority, to implement projects under the CALFED Bay-Delta  
          Program.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   For several years, the Delta has suffered a crisis -  
          ecosystem, water supply, levee stability, water quality, policy,  
          program, and litigation.  In June 2004, a privately owned levee  
          failed and the State spent nearly $100 million to fix it and  
          save an island whose property value was far less.  In August  
          2005, the Department of Fish & Game (DFG) reported a trend  
          showing severe decline in the Delta fishery.  In 2006, the  
          Legislature reorganized Delta programs and funding under the  
          Resources Agency Secretary.  In 2007, a federal judge, acting  
          under the federal Endangered Species Act, declared illegal  
          certain federal biological opinions about near-extinct fish and  
          restricted water exports from the Delta, to the San Francisco  
          Bay Area, the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California.  The  
          Governor shortly thereafter called the Legislature into an  
          extraordinary session on water.  In 2008 and 2009, the Delta  
          watershed has suffered a serious drought, with federal and state  








                                                                  AB 39
                                                                  Page  2

          water projects withholding water leading to violations of water  
          quality standards.

          Through this enduring Delta crisis, the legislature and the  
          Governor initiated, in 2006, a process to develop a new  
          long-term vision for the Delta.  AB 1574 (Kuehl/2006) required a  
          cabinet committee to present recommendations for a Delta vision.  
           The Governor created a Delta Vision Blue-Ribbon Task Force to  
          advise the Cabinet Committee.  The Task Force produced an  
          October 2008 Strategic Plan, which the Cabinet Committee largely  
          adopted and submitted the recommendations to the Legislature on  
          January 3, 2009.  The primary exception to the Cabinet  
          Committee's adoption was the Task Force's recommendation for a  
          new comprehensive, independent "California Delta Water and  
          Ecosystem Council" (CDEW).  The Strategic Plan provides a broad  
          framework for action in the Delta, with numerous recommendations  
          requiring action by the Legislature. 

          This bill would require CDEW, which has not been created, to  
          develop a plan to implement the Task Force's Strategic Plan.   
          Committee members received a copy of the Strategic Plan at the  
          Committee's February hearing on the Delta.  While the bill does  
          not include details of the proposed plan, its reliance on the  
          Strategic Plan means that its outline can be derived from the  
          Strategic Plan's seven goals:
             1)   Legally acknowledge the co-equal goals of restoring the  
               Delta ecosystem and creating a more reliable water supply  
               for California.
             2)   Recognize and enhance the unique cultural, recreational  
               and agricultural values of the California Delta as an  
               evolving place, an action critical to achieving the  
               co-equal goals.
             3)   Restore the Delta ecosystem as the heart of a healthy  
               estuary.
             4)   Promote statewide conservation efficiency, and  
               sustainable use.
             5)   Build facilities to improve the existing water  
               conveyance system and expand statewide storage, and operate  
               both to achieve the co-equal goals.
             6)   Reduce risks to people, property, and state interests in  
               the Delta by effective emergency preparedness, appropriate  
               land uses, and strategic levee investments.
             7)   Establish a new governance structure with the authority,  
               responsibility, accountability, science support, and secure  
               funding to achieve these goals.








                                                                  AB 39
                                                                  Page  3

          The Strategic Plan also includes numerous strategies to achieve  
          those goals and specified actions to implement the strategies.   
          In some cases, the actions identified issues that still needed  
          further analysis and a final decision, which may include making  
          tradeoffs among the often competing Delta interests.

          The author asserts that this bill is a work-in-progress that  
          will allow him to continue discussing direction for the Delta  
          with other members and pursue some sense of common purpose.  He  
          has limited his amendments to this simple declarative sentence.   
          While this bill remains simple at this point, a few policies or  
          principles nevertheless emerge from the bill upon careful  
          reading.  First, the foundation for moving forward in the Delta  
          is the Delta Vision Task Force's Strategic Plan.  The bill, like  
          the Cabinet Committee, adopts the Strategic Plan as the way  
          forward.  The Strategic Plan is so comprehensive that it may  
          include enough actions for every Delta stakeholder to support  
          and others to oppose.  The depth and breadth of this plan allows  
          for public discussion of the changes ahead for the Delta, which  
          has proceeded in a variety of public meetings since October.

          Second, a new, independent council will develop the plan in more  
          detail and submit the plan to the Legislature.  While CDEW will  
          develop the plan, the bill does not specify the role of the  
          Legislature once it receives the plan.  Further legislative  
          discussions may consider the role of the Legislature in making  
          decisions on the Delta.  While some agencies do not like having  
          a new council to oversee agency Delta projects, recent failures  
          of existing agencies to resolve the Delta crisis amid  
          interagency conflict have led to an emerging consensus that  
          Delta governance must change.  Existing governance has failed.

          Finally, the plan is due to be completed at the end of 2010,  
          which is consistent with the Delta Vision Strategic Plan.  The  
          Natural Resources Agency currently leads a process to develop a  
          Bay-Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP) on a different timeline.   
          BDCP is designed to obtain federal permits to take certain  
          species listed as threatened or endangered under the federal  
          Endangered Species Act.  The scope of the BDCP includes  
          decisions on whether and where to build a peripheral canal to  
          take water south and west of the Delta through the state and,  
          possibly, federal water projects.  The Administration has  
          indicated it may complete the BDCP as early as the end of this  
          year, and has set a goal to break ground on new Delta water  
          conveyance in 2011.  








                                                                  AB 39
                                                                  Page  4


          As amended, this bill remains a work-in-progress, which will  
          develop further through the legislative process.  The author has  
          committed to work with interested members through the  
          legislative process and will return the bill to Committee upon  
          completion by the Senate.  Similarly, several Delta bills are  
          now proceeding through the Senate, and this Committee will have  
          the opportunity to consider and amend those bills when the  
          Committee hears Senate bills in June.  The author requests that  
          the Committee allow this bill to proceed, so the Assembly will  
          have a vehicle in the Senate for action on a comprehensive plan  
          for the Delta.  The other Assembly Delta bill whose author has  
          committed to develop collaboratively is AB 13 (Salas) - the  
          Delta conservancy bill.

          In addition to the goals and policies identified above, issues  
          that may require further analysis when a final Delta plan bill  
          is developed include:
                 policies and standards for Delta decisions
                 process to resolve the policy and legal issues  
               identified in the Strategic Plan
                 implementation and enforcement of plan
                 agency responsibilities for plan implementation
                 relationship to existing laws and institutions
                 financing of Delta projects and activities
                 role of the Legislature in decisions related to the plan

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support  :  Natural Resources Defense Council (in concept)

           Watch  :    Metropolitan Water District of So. Cal.

           Opposition  :None submitted
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Alf W. Brandt / W., P. & W. / (916)  
          319-2096