BILL ANALYSIS
ACA 1
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 20, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
ACA 1 (Silva) - As Introduced: December 1, 2009
Policy Committee:
AppropriationsVote:
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This constitutional amendment would require a 2/3 vote of the
Assembly and the Senate for every bill that "would result in
more than $150,000 of annual expenditures" by the state, as
determined by the Department of Finance (DOF). This bill would
require DOF to analyze every bill and every amendment to every
bill and provide the Assembly and Senate Appropriations
Committees, in writing, a determination, as whether the bill
would result in an annual expenditure of more than $150,000.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Significant annual GF costs, in excess of $1 million for
professional fiscal staff, to the DOF to analyze every bill
and every amendment in both houses. Currently DOF analyzes
only a portion of the bills introduced each year. Depending on
the time of year, at some Appropriations hearings, for
example, DOF may have analyses on as few as 10% of the bills
before the committee. During peak budget periods, DOF all but
stops doing bill analyses to attend to state budget issues.
2)One-time GF costs of about $220,000 to include an analysis and
arguments for and against the measure in the statewide voter
pamphlet. The Secretary of State estimates a cost of about
$55,000 per ballot page for statewide elections.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author contends this bill will help the state
find long-term solutions to its budget problems.
ACA 1
Page 2
According to the author, "The Legislature routinely passes
measures that have direct or indirect costs to the state and
have long term cost pressures on state government. Hundreds of
measures are passed and signed each year that add to our
endemic budget crisis and the duties and functions of
government are expanded with every measure enacted?.
"ACA 1 will make the legislative process and funding
mechanisms more transparent and our expenditures more
responsible by judging the real costs of otherwise simple
majority vote measures."
2)Currently any bill that contains a GF appropriation requires a
2/3 vote. This bill would expand this requirement to include
any bill that would result in any expenditure in excess of
$150,000, as determined by DOF.
3)Other States. According to the National Conference on State
Legislatures, as of October 2008, only two other states
require more than a majority vote to pass a state budget
(Arkansas and Rhode Island) and only three states require more
than a majority vote for appropriations (California - for GF
appropriations, South Dakota, and Arkansas - for non education
and highway spending).
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081