BILL NUMBER: ACR 49 ENROLLED
BILL TEXT
ADOPTED IN SENATE AUGUST 31, 2009
ADOPTED IN ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 2, 2009
AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 24, 2009
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 19, 2009
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Evans
MARCH 10, 2009
Relative to the California Law Revision Commission.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
ACR 49, Evans. California Law Revision Commission: studies.
Under existing law, the California Law Revision Commission is
required to study, and is limited to studying, those topics approved
for its study by resolution of the Legislature.
This measure would authorize the commission to study whether
specified laws should be revised, authorize the commission to study
the legal and policy implications of treating a charter school as a
public entity for purposes of the Tort Claims Act, and would also
authorize the removal of one specific topic from the calendar of the
commission.
The measure would require the commission, before commencing work
on any project within the calendar of topics the Legislature has
authorized or directed the commission to study, to submit a detailed
description of the scope of work to the chairs and vice chairs of the
Committees on Judiciary of the Senate and the Assembly, and if
during the course of the project there is a major change to the scope
of work, submit a description of the change.
WHEREAS, The California Law Revision Commission is authorized to
study topics set forth in the calendar contained in its report to the
Governor and the Legislature that have been or are thereafter
approved for study by concurrent resolution of the Legislature, and
topics that have been referred to the commission for study by
concurrent resolution of the Legislature or by statute; and
WHEREAS, The commission, in its annual report covering its
activities for 2008 and 2009, recommends continued study of 21
topics, all of which the Legislature has previously authorized or
directed the commission to study, and further recommends the addition
of one new topic to its calendar and the removal of one previously
authorized topic from its calendar; now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Assembly of the State of California, the Senate
thereof concurring, That the Legislature approves for continued study
by the California Law Revision Commission the topics listed below,
all of which the Legislature has previously authorized or directed
the commission to study:
(1) Whether the law should be revised that relates to creditors'
remedies, including, but not limited to, attachment, garnishment,
execution, repossession of property (including the claim and delivery
statute, self-help repossession of property, and the Commercial Code
provisions on repossession of property), confession of judgment
procedures, default judgment procedures, enforcement of judgments,
the right of redemption, procedures under private power of sale in a
trust deed or mortgage, possessory and nonpossessory liens,
insolvency, and related matters.
(2) Whether the California Probate Code should be revised,
including, but not limited to, the issue of whether California should
adopt, in whole or in part, the Uniform Probate Code, and related
matters.
(3) Whether the law should be revised that relates to real and
personal property, including, but not limited to, a marketable title
act, covenants, servitudes, conditions, and restrictions on land use
or relating to land, powers of termination, escheat of property and
the disposition of unclaimed or abandoned property, eminent domain,
quiet title actions, abandonment or vacation of public streets and
highways, partition, rights and duties attendant on assignment,
subletting, termination, or abandonment of a lease, and related
matters.
(4) Whether the law should be revised that relates to family law,
including, but not limited to, community property, the adjudication
of child and family civil proceedings, child custody, adoption,
guardianship, freedom from parental custody and control, and related
matters, including other subjects covered by the Family Code.
(5) Whether the law relating to discovery in civil cases should be
revised.
(6) Whether the acts governing special assessments for public
improvement should be simplified and unified.
(7) Whether the law relating to the rights and disabilities of
minors and incompetent persons should be revised.
(8) Whether the Evidence Code should be revised.
(9) Whether the law relating to arbitration, mediation, and other
alternative dispute resolution techniques should be revised.
(10) Whether there should be changes to administrative law.
(11) Whether the law relating to the payment and the shifting of
attorney's fees between litigants should be revised.
(12) Whether the Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act,
or parts of that uniform act, and related provisions should be
adopted in California.
(13) Recommendations to be reported pertaining to statutory
changes that may be necessitated by court unification.
(14) Whether the law of contracts should be revised, including the
law relating to the effect of electronic communications on the law
governing contract formation, the statute of frauds, the parol
evidence rule, and related matters.
(15) Whether the law governing common interest housing
developments should be revised to clarify the law, eliminate
unnecessary or obsolete provisions, consolidate existing statutes in
one place in the codes, establish a clear, consistent, and unified
policy with regard to formation and management of these developments
and transaction of real property interests located within them, and
to determine to what extent they should be subject to regulation.
(16) Whether the statutes of limitation for legal malpractice
actions should be revised to recognize equitable tolling or other
adjustment for the circumstances of simultaneous litigation, and
related matters.
(17) Whether the law governing disclosure of public records and
the law governing protection of privacy in public records should be
revised to better coordinate them, including consolidation and
clarification of the scope of required disclosure and creation of a
single set of disclosure procedures, to provide appropriate
enforcement mechanisms, and to ensure that the law governing
disclosure of public records adequately treats electronic
information, and related matters.
(18) Whether the law governing criminal sentences for enhancements
relating to weapons or injuries should be revised to simplify and
clarify the law and eliminate unnecessary or obsolete provisions.
(19) Whether the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with
Section 66410) of Title 7 of the Government Code) and the Mitigation
Fee Act (Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 66000), Chapter 6
(commencing with Section 66010), Chapter 7 (commencing with Section
66012), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 66016), and Chapter 9
(commencing with Section 66020) of Division 1 of Title 7 of the
Government Code) should be revised to improve their organization,
resolve inconsistencies, and clarify and rationalize provisions, and
related matters.
(20) Whether the Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act (1995)
should be adopted in California in whole or part, and related
matters.
(21) Whether the law governing the place of trial in a civil case
should be revised; and be it further
Resolved, That the Legislature approves for study by the
California Law Revision Commission the new topic listed below:
Analysis of the legal and policy implications of treating a
charter school as a public entity for the purposes of Division 3.6
(commencing with Section 810) of Title 1 of the Government Code; and
be it further
Resolved, That the Legislature approves removal from the calendar
of the California Law Revision Commission the topic listed below:
Whether the law relating to offers of compromise should be
revised; and be it further
Resolved, That before commencing work on any project within the
calendar of topics the Legislature has authorized or directed the
commission to study, the commission shall submit a detailed
description of the scope of work to the chairs and vice chairs of the
Committees on Judiciary of the Senate and Assembly, and if during
the course of the project there is a major change to the scope of
work, submit a description of the change; and be it further
Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit a copy of
this resolution to the California Law Revision Commission; and be it
further
Resolved, That the Chief Clerk of the Assembly transmit copies of
this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.