BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AJR 26
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AJR 26 (Chesbro)
          As Amended  January 14, 2010
          Majority vote 

           NATURAL RESOURCES   6-2                                         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Skinner, Brownley,        |     |                          |
          |     |Chesbro,                  |     |                          |
          |     |De Leon, Hill, Huffman    |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Knight, Logue             |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requests the U.S. Congress to establish a  
          comprehensive framework, including dedicated funding for  
          adapting our nation's wildlife, habitats, coasts, watersheds,  
          rivers, and other natural resources and ecosystems to the  
          impacts of climate change.

           EXISTING LAW  requires:

          1)ARB to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions limit  
            equivalent to 1990 levels by 2020 and adopt regulations to  
            achieve maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective  
            GHG emission reductions.

          2)The preparation of a Climate Action Team Report (CAT Report).   
            Each agency listed in the CAT Report must annually prepare a  
            list of measures implemented and proposed to be implemented to  
            meet the GHG reduction target established by the CAT Report.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author's office, this resolution  
          "attempts to address the lack of funding for climate change  
          adaptation.  California does not have a dedicated funding source  
          for necessary planning and actions that will protect the state  
          from unavoidable climate change impacts.  This resolution also  
          attempts to support federal climate change programs that include  
          comprehensive adaptation planning and implementation as an  
          essential element of those programs."








                                                                  AJR 26
                                                                  Page  2



           Natural Resources Agency's Climate Adaptation Strategy (CAS)  :   
          In December 2009, pursuant to a November 2008 Executive Order  
          (S-13-08), the Natural Resources Agency finalized its CAS, which  
          summarizes anticipated climate change impacts and recommends  
          near and long-term strategies to increase the resilience and  
          adaptive capacity of the state to respond to these impacts. The  
          CAS defines climate change adaptation as "Adjustments in natural  
          or human systems in response to actual or expected climatic  
          stimuli or their effects, which minimizes harm or takes  
          advantage of beneficial opportunities." Given budget  
          constraints, the CAS only commits to implement the near-term  
          strategies by December 2010 using existing resources.

          Examples of more significant near-term strategies include the  
          development of sea-level rise adaptation plans or guidance by 12  
          resource departments and Caltrans, creation of a 23-member  
          Climate Adaptation Advisory Panel, and preparation of a Climate  
          Vulnerability Assessment.  Moreover, the CAS recommends that  
          Local Coastal Plans be provisionally amended by 2011 to account  
          for climate change impacts, including sea-level rise; state  
          agencies should consider project alternatives that avoid  
          significant new development in areas that cannot be adequately  
          protected from flooding or erosion due to climate change.

           Pending federal climate legislation and adaptation  :  The  
          American Clean Energy and Security Act (Waxman-Markey), approved  
          by the House of Representatives in June 2009, creates a  
          comprehensive National Climate Change Adaptation Program, which  
          creates a multitude of federal sub-programs to support both  
          state-level and international adaptation planning and action.   
          The Program includes research, governance, assessment, planning,  
          and funding elements.  

          Five adapation programs-domestic, wildlife and natural  
          resources, public health, federal agency, and international  
          efforts-would be funded by revenues generated by  auctioning a  
          percentage of emission allowances, starting in 2012 and  
          continuing through 2050.  The percentage of allowance proceeds  
          dedicated to adapation would ramp up over time, escaltating to  
          12% between 2027-2050.  State funding allocations, contingent  
          upon an approved adapation plan, would be determined by  
          population and per capita income formula.  Of the funding  
          dedicated to states, 84.4% is allocated to state wildlife  








                                                                  AJR 26
                                                                  Page  3


          agencies and 15.6% to state coastal agencies.

          S. 1733, the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act  
          (Kerry-Boxer), pending in the U.S. Senate, contains adaptation  
          provisions similar to the Waxman-Markey bill.  In addition, it  
          includes provisions governing drinking water adaptation, flood  
          control and prevention, wildfire, and coastal/Great Lakes  
          adaptation.  Funding similarly relies on auction revenues though  
          the bill dedicates 38.5% of revenues to states; of this amount,  
          32.5% will go to state wildlife agencies, 6% to state coastal  
          agencies.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Dan Chia / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 


                                                                FN: 0003551