BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AJR 43|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AJR 43
          Author:   Hill (D)
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
          WITHOUT REFERENCE TO COMMITTEE OR FILE
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  51-19, 7/1/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Television:  audio loudness

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This resolution urges the Congress and the  
          President of the United States to enact legislation to  
          establish a standard to minimize the "audio loudness  
          differential" in television. 

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing federal law authorizes the Federal  
          Trade Commission to require energy disclosures for certain  
          consumer electronics, including televisions, personal  
          computers, cable or satellite set-top boxes, stand-alone  
          digital video recorder boxes, and personal monitors; and  
          preempts state labeling regulations once a rule is adopted  
          for a specific appliance. 

          Existing state law requires the California Energy  
          Commission (CEC) to adopt regulatory standards for minimum  
          levels of operating efficiency for appliances, the use of  
          which requires a significant amount of energy or water on a  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AJR 43
                                                                Page  
          2

          statewide basis.  These regulations cannot result in any  
          added total of costs for consumers over the designed life  
          of the regulated appliances. 

           Background

           Every year, television networks receive thousands of  
          complaints from viewers bothered by sudden increase in  
          volume when television commercials are aired.  Current  
          federal regulation requires advertisements to be no more  
          than the highest decibel level of a television show, which  
          often contains a mix of audio levels intended to build  
          dramatic effect.  Thus, many advertisers use the highest  
          decibel of a television baseline volume which makes the  
          entire commercial loud. 

          Since 1954, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has  
          been aware of excessively loud commercial advertisements on  
          television and radio.  In the 25 quarterly reports on  
          consumer complaints that have been released since 2002, 21  
          have listed complaints about the "abrupt changes in volume"  
          during transition from regular programming to commercials,  
          as the top consumer grievance regarding radio and  
          television broadcasting.  

          The Library of Congress has noted that legislation  
          addressing this matter has already been adopted in  
          Australia, Brazil, France, Israel, Russia, and the United  
          Kingdom. 

          In 2008, Representative Anna Eshoo (D-CA) introduced The  
          Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act (CALM Act,  
          H.R. 1084) to address loud commercials, and directs the FCC  
          to enact within one-year rules requiring television  
          advertisements to not be excessively noisy. 

          AJR 43 urges federal legislators to support the passage of  
          H.R. 1084 and establish a standard that broadcasters and  
          others can use to minimize the "audio loudness  
          differential" in television. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Fiscal Com.:  No

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, "We all  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AJR 43
                                                                Page  
          3

          understand that commercials are necessary in order to  
          sustain free over-the-air television.  However, that does  
          not give advertisers the right to scream at consumers in  
          their living rooms.  In the absence of action on part of  
          the broadcasters to self-regulate these aggressive  
          advertising tactics, it is our responsibility to protect  
          consumers and establish a standard that broadcasters and  
          others can use to minimize the 'audio loudness  
          differential' in television." 


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Carter, Coto,  
            Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher,  
            Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Gatto, Hall, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huffman, Jones, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal,  
            Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Nestande, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Skinner, Solorio,  
            Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico,  
            Yamada, John A. Perez
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, DeVore,  
            Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Gilmore, Huber, Knight, Logue,  
            Miller, Niello, Nielsen, Norby, Smyth, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Bill Berryhill, Charles Calderon,  
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Hagman, Harkey, Jeffries, Silva,  
            Vacancy


          JJA:mw  8/18/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                       SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  NONE RECEIVED

                                ****  END  ****











                                                           CONTINUED