BILL ANALYSIS
AB 57
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 6, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 57 (Price) - As Introduced: December 5, 2008
Policy Committee: HealthVote:13-6
Higher Education 6-3
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires the California Department of Public Health
(DPH) to establish a process for the review of written staffing
plans and patient classification systems to be submitted by the
five University of California (UC) medical centers.
FISCAL EFFECT
1)Fee-supported special fund cost of approximately $10,000 to
DPH to review staffing plans submitted by the five University
of California Medical Centers.
2)Unknown, likely absorbable staffing costs to the UC to provide
DPH with staffing reports and evidence of patient
classification methodologies.
COMMENTS
1)Purpose . This bill is sponsored by the American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME). AFSCME has
180,000 members in California, many of whom are health care
workers at UC medical center campuses. The author and sponsor
indicate safe staffing levels for hospital personnel are
critical for quality patient care. Understaffing of
professional and technical hospital employees may endanger
patient care by forcing staff to care for multiple patients in
different units of the hospital, delaying timely diagnostic
testing, causing inaccurate diagnoses, and increasing employee
injuries. This bill increases transparency of UC approaches to
staffing and patient classification systems that impact
AB 57
Page 2
staffing patterns.
2)UC Medical Centers and Concerns . The five medical centers
operated by UC (Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego, and San
Francisco) support the clinical teaching programs of UC
medical schools and provide more than 138,000 in-patient,
261,000 emergency room, and more than 3.6 million outpatient
visits each year.
3)Related Legislation . AB 2244 (Price) in 2008 was similar to
this bill and was vetoed due to concerns about the bill being
only focused on UC hospitals. AB 57 remains focused on the UC
hospitals. AB 13 (Brownley) in 2007 was similar to this bill,
but broader in focus and included all California hospitals,
not just UC. AB 13 was placed on the inactive file of the
Senate. AB 2754 (Chan), in 2006, was similar to AB 13 and
failed passage on the Senate floor.
Analysis Prepared by : Mary Ader / APPR. / (916) 319-2081