BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    





           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |                                                                 |
          |         SENATE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES AND WATER         |
          |                   Senator Fran Pavley, Chair                    |
          |                    2009-2010 Regular Session                    |
          |                                                                 |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

          BILL NO: AB 74                     HEARING DATE: June 23, 2009  
          AUTHOR: Chesbro                    URGENCY: No  
          VERSION: May 26, 2009              CONSULTANT: Dennis O'Connor  
          DUAL REFERRAL: No                  FISCAL: Yes  
          SUBJECT: Flood control: Middle Creek and Hamilton City Flood  
          Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Projects.  
          
          BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
          Under the State Water Resources Law of 1945, the state may  
          participate in funding local flood control projects that are  
          authorized by the legislature and that meet all of the following  
          criteria:
           The project qualifies for federal financial assistance and is  
            authorized by Congress.  
           The total annual benefit exceeds the annual cost of providing  
            protection from flood damages.
           The project provides protection from flood damages in the most  
            efficient manner practicable, and with due regard for  
            environmental and recreational considerations, and local  
            economic conditions.
           The project's nonfederal sponsor is in compliance with federal  
            laws requiring the preparation, adoption, and implementation  
            of a floodplain management plan.  
           All local communities benefiting from the project have an  
            ordinance consistent with the National Flood Insurance  
            Program's model floodplain management ordinance.
           The project avoids, minimizes, or mitigates impacts to  
            environmental and recreational values.
           Project planning documents include an evaluation of  
            opportunities to include multipurpose objectives. 
           The nonfederal sponsor accommodates other partners who wish to  
            provide the costs of including multipurpose objectives that  
            are compatible with the project's purpose and schedule.

          Before receiving payment or reimbursement from the state, the  
          local agency must enter into an agreement with the DWR under  
          which the local agency agrees to indemnify, hold, and save the  
                                                                      1







          state, and its officers, agents, and employees, harmless from  
          any and all liabilities from damages associated with the  
          maintenance and operation of the project.

          On November 8, 2007, Congress passed the federal Water Resources  
          Development Act of 2007 over President Bush's veto.  Section  
          1001 of that Act authorized, among other things, the following  
          two projects:

           (8) HAMILTON CITY, GLENN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.-The project for  
              flood damage reduction and environmental restoration,  
              Hamilton City, Glenn County, California: Report of the Chief  
              of Engineers dated December 22, 2004, at a total cost of  
              $52,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $34,100,000  
              and estimated non-Federal cost of $18,300,000.

           (11)MIDDLE CREEK, LAKE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.-The project for  
              flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, Middle  
              Creek, Lake County, California: Report of the Chief of  
              Engineers dated November 29, 2004, at a total cost of  
              $45,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $29,500,000  
              and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,700,000.

          PROPOSED LAW
          This bill would authorize state participation in the following  
          two projects:
           The Hamilton City Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem  
            Restoration Project in Glenn County
           The Middle Creek Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem  
            Restoration Project in Lake County 

          ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT
          Supporters of both projects observe that each project provides  
          multiple benefits, including flood protection and environmental  
          restoration. 

          ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:  None

          COMMENTS 
          These projects appear to meet all the requirements for state  
          participation.  Both Propositions 1E and 84 provide funds to  
          cover the state's flood subvention obligations.

          SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS:  None

          SUPPORT
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
                                                                      2







          Big Valley Groundwater Management Zone Commission 
          Chi Council for the Clear Lake Hitch
          Glenn County Board of Supervisors
          Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake Tribe
          Hamilton City Citizens In Action 
          Hamilton City Community Services District
          Hamilton City Fire Protection District
          Honorable Dianne Feinstein, United States Senator
          Honorable Wally Herger, United States Senator
          Lake County Board of Supervisors 
          Lake County Land Trust
          Lakeport Regional Chamber of Commerce 
          Lee Grigsby & Associates
          Reclamation District 2140
          Redbud Audubon Chapter
          Sierra Club Lake Group
          The Nature Conservancy
          West Lake Resource Conservation District

          OPPOSITION
          None Received


























                                                                      3