BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    






                                 SENATE HEALTH
                               COMMITTEE ANALYSIS
                        Senator Elaine K. Alquist, Chair


          BILL NO:       AB 75                                        
          A
          AUTHOR:        Huffman                                      
          B
          AMENDED:       March 26, 2009
          HEARING DATE:  July 8, 2009                                 
          7
          CONSULTANT:                                                 
          5
          Dunstan/                                                   
                                        

                                     SUBJECT
                                         
                                    Medi-Cal

                                     SUMMARY  

          Revises, or purposes of Medi-Cal hospital payments, the  
          methodology for determining which non-contract hospitals in  
          an open health facility planning area (HFPA) are subject to  
          a specified reduction in payments by excluding state-owned  
          or -operated hospitals from the calculations used to  
          determine if other hospitals are subject to the reduction.


                             CHANGES TO EXISTING LAW  

          Existing law:
          Establishes the Medi-Cal program, administered by the  
          Department of Health Care Services (DHCS), which provides  
          comprehensive health care coverage for low-income  
          individuals and their families; pregnant women; elderly,  
          blind, or disabled persons; nursing home residents; and  
          refugees who meet specified eligibility criteria. 

          Requires the California Medical Assistance Commission to  
          negotiate rates, terms and conditions for contracts with  
          hospitals for inpatient services to be rendered to Medi-Cal  
          program beneficiaries. 

                                                         Continued---



          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 75 (Huffman)          Page  
          2


          

          Reduces Medi-Cal interim payments and cost report  
          settlements by 10 percent for amounts paid for inpatient  
          hospital services on and after July 1, 2008, that are  
          provided by hospitals that are not under contract with the  
          state.  Further reduces, effective October 1, 2008,  
          non-contract hospital Medi-Cal interim payments and cost  
          report settlements, pursuant to a specified formula.  

          Exempts from the October 1 rate reduction, hospitals in an  
          "open" HFPA, except in open HFPAs with three or more  
          hospitals.  (Open FHPA means areas of the state where the  
          state does not competitively contract for Medi-Cal  
          inpatient services).  Exempts hospitals in an open HFPA  
          from the cost report settlement reduction unless they are  
          located in an open HFPA with more than three hospitals. 

          This bill:
          Excludes state-owned or state-operated hospitals from being  
          included in the determination of whether an open HFPA has  
          three or more hospitals and is therefore subject to a  
          Medi-Cal interim payment rate reduction.

          Excludes state-owned or state-operated hospitals from being  
          used to determine whether an open HFPA has three hospitals  
          or more and is thereby subject to a hospital cost report  
          settlement Medi-Cal payment rate reduction.  Revises the  
          cost report settlement criteria by requiring that the  
          Medi-Cal hospital cost settlement report reduction applies  
          in an open HFPA with three or more hospitals, instead of  
          more than three   hospitals.

          Makes legislative findings and declarations that the  
          Legislature did not intend that a state-owned or  
          state-operated hospital be included in determining the  
          number of hospitals with licensed general acute care beds  
          in an open HFPA and did not mean for them to be counted in  
          the methodology for calculating exemptions to the rate and  
          cost report settlement provisions.  States that the  
          Legislature's intent in enacting this bill is to construe  
          and clarify the meaning and effect of existing law. 
          
                                  FISCAL IMPACT  

          According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee  
          analysis, there would be increased annual Medi-Cal  




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 75 (Huffman)          Page  
          3


          

          inpatient hospital revenues in the range of $10 million (50  
          percent General Fund) to return the six hospitals to  
          cost-based reimbursement rather than subjecting the  
          hospitals to the rate reductions.   

                            BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION  

          According to the author, this bill would clarify provisions  
          of the 2008-09 health budget trailer bill that were  
          intended to protect certain hospitals from a Medi-Cal  
          budget reduction by excluding state-run and state-operated  
          hospitals from the count used to determine whether  
          hospitals in open HFPAs are subject to a budget reduction.

          Background
          Since 1983, through what is known as the Selective Provider  
          Contracting Program (SPCP), CMAC has been the state agency  
          responsible for negotiating contracts with hospitals on  
          behalf of the state for inpatient services under the  
          fee-for-service Medi-Cal Program.  Through CMAC, the state  
          selectively contracts on a competitive basis with hospitals  
          for fee-for-service inpatient services provided to Medi-Cal  
          beneficiaries.  According to CMAC, the competitive  
          contracting model has resulted in savings to the state  
          General Fund of over $600 million this fiscal year.  CMAC  
          has negotiated rates on behalf of the state with 179  
          hospitals as of December 1, 2008, in "closed areas" of the  
          state.  "Closed areas" are those HFPAs where SPCP contracts  
          have been signed and Medi-Cal beneficiaries must generally  
          receive inpatient care at a contract hospital.  "Open  
          areas" are those HFPAs where the SPCP is generally not in  
          effect and are primarily rural areas with a limited number  
          of hospitals, where competitive contracting is not  
          feasible.  

          Hospitals that do not contract with the state in the  
          fee-for-service Medi-Cal program are known as non-contract  
          hospitals.  When non-contract hospitals bill Medi-Cal for  
          services, they are initially paid an interim rate.   
          Hospitals are then required to submit a cost report within  
          five months of the close of their fiscal period, and the  
          Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) reviews each  
          hospital's cost report and prepares a tentative settlement,  
          which is a determination of the allowable reimbursable  
          reported costs for a hospital's fiscal period.  DHCS  




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 75 (Huffman)          Page  
          4


          

          compares what a hospital was paid in interim payments for  
          the hospital's fiscal period, to the hospital's allowable  
          reimbursable reported costs for that fiscal period.  The  
          difference may result in either an underpayment that is  
          paid to the hospital or an overpayment that is recouped  
          from the hospital.  

          2008-2009 budget trailer bill
          When AB 1183 was drafted, state-owned or -operated acute  
          care hospitals were not excluded in the calculation  
          determining which HFPAs include three or more hospitals and  
          would then be affected by the cuts.  This means that  
          state-owned hospitals are included even though they clearly  
          do not provide services equivalent to a community hospital.  
           DHCS states that they have been forced by the statute to  
          interpret the language to include state-owned hospitals,  
          therefore affecting community hospitals in open HFPAs that  
          were not intended to be affected by the budget cut and they  
          cannot correct this problem administratively.  There are 10  
          state-owned or operated hospitals with general acute care  
          beds in the state operated by the Department of Mental  
          Health, California Department of Developmental Services,  
          California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation,  
          and California Department of Veterans Affairs.  Including  
          these state hospitals in the three-or-more count makes more  
          hospitals subject to the required rate reduction. 

          DHCS indicates six hospitals have had an unintended rate  
          reduction from the inclusion of state-owned facilities in  
          this count.  The affected hospitals are Sonoma Valley  
          Hospital, Petaluma Valley Hospital, St. Helena Hospital,  
          Queen of the Valley Hospital, Hoag Memorial Hospital  
          Presbyterian and College Hospital, Costa Mesa.  According  
          to DHCS, if the situation is not corrected, some of these  
          hospitals could lose up $3 million in Medi-Cal payments.

          Preliminary injunction protects hospitals from rate  
          decrease
          Following recently enacted Medi-Cal budget reductions,  
          several lawsuits by providers and stakeholders have been  
          filed.  In early April 2009, the California Hospital  
          Association's request to be added to a current preliminary  
          injunction was granted by the Ninth Circuit Court of  
          Appeal.  Among other issues, the injunction applies to the  
          rate reductions for inpatient services for non-contract  




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 75 (Huffman)          Page  
          5


          

          hospitals which are addressed in AB 75.
          
          Related bills
          AB 728 (Neilson), also revises the methodology for  
          determining which non-contract hospitals in an open HFPA  
          are subject to an interim payment rate reduction and a cost  
          settlement report reduction reversing Medi-Cal rate  
          reductions that were recently enacted.  This bill is in the  
          Assembly Health Committee.
          
          Prior legislation
          AB 1183 (Committee on Budget), Chapter 758, Statutes of  
          2008, was the health budget trailer bill for the 2008-2009  
          budget.  Among its other provisions, it reduces  
          fee-for-service Medi-Cal payments for inpatient care at  
          hospitals that do not contract with Medi-Cal through the  
          California Medical Assistance Commission (CMAC), effective  
          October 1, 2008 until January 1, 2013.

          Arguments in support
          According to DHCS, the bill's sponsor, AB 75 would enable  
          DHCS to restore Medi-Cal payments for inpatient hospital  
          services provided from October 1, 2008 through the  
          enactment of this bill to those non-contract hospitals that  
          were unintentionally impacted by the rate reduction.  When  
          AB 1183 was drafted, DHCS states, it was not their  
          intention to include state-owned or -operated acute care  
          hospitals in the calculation determining which HFPAs  
          includes three or more hospitals and would then be affected  
          by the cuts.  They state that they have been forced by the  
          statute to interpret the language to include state-owned  
          hospitals, therefore affecting community hospitals in open  
          HFPAs.  Finally, DHCS states this bill corrects an  
          inconsistency in statute to ensure that hospitals which  
          received an intended interim rate reduction do not have  
          funds restored during the DHCS audit and cost settlement  
          process. 

          The California Hospital Association (CHA) writes in support  
          that this bill corrects an unintended consequence from the  
          2008-09 budget regarding Medi-Cal cuts to hospitals. Others  
          writing in support agree that it was never the intent of  
          the Legislature to include state-owned hospitals in the  
          calculations for rate reductions and that this bill will  
          help these facilities avoid devastating budget cuts.




          STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 75 (Huffman)          Page  
          6


          



                                  PRIOR ACTIONS

           Assembly Floor:          79-0
          Assembly Appropriations:17-0
          Assembly Health:    18-0


                                    POSITIONS  
                                        
          Support:  Department of Health Care Services (sponsor)
                 American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
                 Association of California HealthCare Districts
                 California Alliance for Retired Americans
                 California Hospital Association
                 Congress of California Seniors
                 Queen of the Valley Medical Center
                 St. Helena Hospital
                 St. Joseph Health System-Sonoma County
                 Sonoma Valley Hospital


          Oppose:  None received

                                   -- END --