BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
92 (De Leon)
Hearing Date: 6/29/2009 Amended: 5/12/2009
Consultant: Bob Franzoia Policy Vote: None
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: AB 92, an urgency measure, would appropriate
$617,711.41 from various funds to the Victim Compensation and
Government Claims Board to pay 120 claims (11 departments)
accepted by the board.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Fund
Appropriations $617
General$0.146 Special*
* Motor Vehicle Account
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: Pursuant to the committee's rules, the Suspense
File rule does not apply to the provisions of this bill as
claims are considered valid obligations of the state.
Additionally, claims may have time sensitivity.
The State Board of Control was established in 1945. It was
revised and renamed the California Victim Compensation and
Government Claims Board (board) by Chapter 1016/2000 (AB 2491,
Jackson). Government Code 13928 requires the board to ensure
that all claims which have been approved by the board, and for
which there exists no legally available appropriation, are
submitted for legislative approval at least twice during each
calendar year.
Of the 10 largest claims contained in this bill, five, for a
total of $384,975 are for unredeemed state treasury bonds and
five, for a total of $117,099.57 are for the re-issuance of
stale-dated warrants. For stale-dated warrants, the Controller
must confirm that (1) the check was not cashed and has not been
issued and (2) more than three years have elapsed since the
check was issued and the monies have reverted to the General
Fund. For these warrants an appropriation is needed to reissue
the payment. A similar process is applied for state treasury
bonds that have not been redeemed within ten years of their
maturity date.
This bill contains one claim for a refund of $6,250.26.
Generally, an audit discovers the claimant overpaid and the
agency, in this case the Franchise Tax Board, acknowledges it
owes the refund, but the period for the claimant to file for a
refund has expired so the agency cannot disburse it
administratively.