BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 94
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 94 (Evans)
          As Amended April 20, 2009
          Majority vote 

           REVENUE & TAXATION  7-1         APPROPRIATIONS      13-4         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Charles Calderon, Beall,  |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano, Charles |
          |     |Coto, Ma, Nielsen,        |     |Calderon, Davis, Fuentes, |
          |     |Portantino, Saldana       |     |Hall, John A. Perez,      |
          |     |                          |     |Price, Skinner, Solorio,  |
          |     |                          |     |Audra Strickland,         |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson, Krekorian      |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|DeVore                    |Nays:|Nielsen, Duvall, Harkey,  |
          |     |                          |     |Miller                    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Reauthorizes the awarding of tax credits under the  
          Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit Act of 2000 (Act) through  
          fiscal year (FY) 2018-19.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Deletes the provisions of the Act that:

             a)   Limit the total amount of tax credits that can be awarded  
               under the Act to $100 million; and, 

             b)   Prohibit tax credits from being awarded after FY 2007-08  
               without further statutory authorization.    

          2)Provides that tax credits may be awarded under the Act only if  
            the amount of all lost revenue resulting from the award of tax  
            credits is reimbursed by transfer to the General Fund (GF) of  
            "moneys that are not from the GF."  

          3)Defines "moneys that are not from the GF" as any of the  
            following:

             a)   State bond funds as described in Public Resources Code  
               (PRC) Section 37032;

             b)   State funds available for the purposes of the Act, other  
               than funds specified in PRC Section 37014;








                                                                  AB 94
                                                                  Page  2


             c)   Court settlements;

             d)   Private or public donations;

             e)   Local government funds of any type; or, 

             f)   Federal funds available for the purposes of the Act.  

          4)Expands the Act's definition of "donee" to include a local  
            government that has submitted an application directly to the  
            Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB). 

          5)Provides that, if a local government applies directly to the WCB  
            for acceptance of a qualified donation, the WCB may provide  
            conditional approval for the local government to acquire the  
            property under the Act.  The local government shall reimburse  
            the GF for the tax credit claimed by transferring funds in the  
            full amount of the approved tax credit to the WCB for deposit  
            into the Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit Reimbursement  
            Account.

          6)Provides that, if a local government applies directly to the WCB  
            for acceptance of a qualified donation, and the WCB provides  
            conditional approval, the local government shall have 60 days to  
            transfer to the WCB the full amount of funds necessary to  
            reimburse the GF.  Upon receipt of these funds, the WCB shall  
            provide the donor and the local government with a notice of  
            final approval of the tax credit.  

          7)Specifies that the information the Franchise Tax Board (FTB)  
            provides the WCB on tax credits claimed shall include the tax  
            year for which the credit was claimed.  

          8)Provides that, if a local government applies for a designated  
            nonprofit organization to acquire and accept donated property,  
            the local government shall comply with all requirements of the  
            Act that apply to the local government transferring funds to the  
            WCB necessary to reimburse the GF.  

          9)Amends the definition of "displaced person" contained in the  
            Government Code chapter that provides for relocation assistance  
            to those displaced by a public entity.  Specifically, this bill  
            specifies that a "displaced person" shall not include "[a]ny  
            person who donates or willingly sells his or her property for  
            the purposes of protecting fish and wildlife habitat, providing  







                                                                  AB 94
                                                                  Page  3


            recreational areas, or preserving cultural or agricultural  
            resources and open space and any person who occupies that  
            property on a rental basis."  However, this exclusion does not  
            apply when a sale is in response to an eminent domain  
            proceeding.  

          10)Makes certain technical and non-substantive changes to the Act.  

           
          EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the WCB.  The WCB is charged with authorizing and  
            allocating funds for the purchase of property suitable for  
            recreation and the preservation, protection and restoration of  
            wildlife habitat.  

          2)Requires the WCB to implement the Natural Heritage Preservation  
            Tax Credit Program (Program).  Under the Program, upon the WCB's  
            approval, a "donor" may contribute qualified property to a  
            "donee" and receive a nonrefundable tax credit equal to 55% of  
            the fair market value of any qualified contribution of property  
            made on or before June 30, 2008.  

          3)Limits the total amount of tax credits that can be awarded under  
            the Act to $100 million and prohibits tax credits from being  
            awarded after FY 2007-08 without further statutory  
            authorization.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)No direct impact on the General Fund (GF) as the credits  
            (estimated by the Franchise Tax Board to be about $7 million per  
            year) are fully reimbursed by bond funds, federal or local  
            funds, donations, or other sources, all of which could be used  
            for other purposes, absent this program.

          2)Potential reallocation of tens of millions of Proposition 84  
            bond funds, to the extent the funds currently authorized to be  
            used to reimburse the GF for the credits would be available for  
            other purposes absent the reauthorization of this program.

          3)Minor indirect impact (initially in the range of $20,000 per  
            year and growing over time) on GF expenditures to backfill  
            schools for reduced property taxes, to the extent that the  







                                                                  AB 94
                                                                  Page  4


            credit results in a higher level of land donations and, hence, a  
            reduced property tax roll.

           COMMENTS  :  The author states, "With a continually expanding  
          population, California needs to preserve land, restore habitats,  
          and protect water supplies.  However, we are also facing uncertain  
          fiscal times, where every dollar of previously approved bonds must  
          be maximized.  This bill would extend a 'financial tool' that can  
          save 45% on the purchase price  if  the state or local agency  
          chooses to use the tax credit program to acquire recreation or  
          habitat lands AND  if  the landowner agrees.  Effectively, this  
          voluntary program allows California to acquire $18 million of land  
          for every $10 million of bond funding, while providing fair value  
          to the landowner, and keeping the General Fund whole.  During its  
          previous authorization period, the Natural Heritage Preservation  
          Tax Credit saved California approximately $40 million in the  
          acquisition of more than 8,000 acres of land in Calaveras, Lake,  
          Los Angeles, Madera, Marin, Monterey, Sacramento, San Luis Obispo,  
          Santa Barbara, Tehama, and Ventura Counties.  This bill would  
          allow the state to once again work with interested landowners to  
          provide a legacy for future generations of Californians."  

          Committee Staff Comments:

          1)A Different Kind of Credit.

             a)   Credits are used to reduce the amount of taxes a taxpayer  
               owes.  Typically, the Legislature enacts tax credits to  
               encourage socially beneficial behavior.  Thus, credit amounts  
               are usually based on a percentage of specified costs incurred  
               by the taxpayer.  In the present case, the amount of the  
               credit is equal to 55% of the fair market value of land  
               donated.  

             b)   Tax credits can either be nonrefundable or refundable.   
               Nonrefundable credits, like those authorized by the Act, work  
               only to reduce a taxpayer's tax liability.  Usually, any  
               remaining credit amount left after reducing the taxpayer's  
               liability to zero can be carried forward to offset the  
               taxpayer's tax liability in future years.  With a refundable  
               credit, however, the state must refund the remaining value of  
               the credit after tax due is reduced to zero.  It should be  
               noted that nonrefundable credits rarely help lower-income  
               taxpayers because these taxpayers have little or no tax  
               liability to offset. 







                                                                  AB 94
                                                                  Page  5



             c)   The Natural Heritage Preservation Tax Credit operates  
               differently from other tax credits.  Specifically, these  
               credits are funded by bond funds, private donations, and  
               other specified moneys, instead of foregone tax revenues that  
               would normally flow to the GF.  Because these credits have no  
               impact on the GF, this bill removes the current $100 million  
               cap contained in the Act.  

           

          Analysis Prepared by  :  M. David Ruff / REV. & TAX. / (916)  
          319-2098 


                                                                  FN: 0001037