BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 113
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   January 21, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                 AB 113 (Portantino) - As Amended:  January 4, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Health Vote:18-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires health plans and insurers to provide patients  
          with information regarding recommended timelines for the  
          screening for and diagnosis of breast cancer. This bill  
          authorizes information to be provided in a variety of formats  
          including letters, newsletters, coverage publications, or  
          electronic communication. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          No direct state fiscal impact. Because the provision of  
          information parameters in this bill are broad, health plans and  
          insurers indicate this bill codifies current notification  
          practices about mammography and other breast cancer screening  
          and diagnostic methods. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . This bill establishes a requirement for health  
            plans and insurers to communicate with patients specifically  
            about breast cancer screening and diagnosis recommendations.  
            According to the author, increased communication about this  
            kind of screening will reduce morbidity and mortality by  
            identifying cancer earlier and more frequently than under  
            current law. 

           2)Breast Cancer in California  . One in nine women in California  
            has a lifetime risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer. The  
            breast cancer death rate in California has dropped 20% over  
            the last two decades, but California women are more likely to  
            be diagnosed with breast cancer today.  While the death rate  
            for breast cancer has dropped, the gains have not been shared  








                                                                  AB 113
                                                                  Page  2

            equally among all women.  Women of color and low-income women  
            are less likely to be diagnosed at an early stage of cancer  
            and receive effective treatment. Therefore their survival  
            rates are lower than other groups of women.  For example,  
            African-American women, although less likely to be diagnosed  
            with breast cancer, have one of the highest breast cancer  
            death rates.   

           3)Changes in Screening Guidelines  . The United States Preventive  
            Services Task Force (USPSTF) is an independent federal panel  
            of experts in primary care and prevention that systematically  
            reviews the evidence of effectiveness and develops  
            recommendations for clinical preventive services. In November  
            2009 the USPSTF changed mammography screening recommendations  
            to biennial screening mammography for women aged 50 to 74  
            years. Many patients and providers have been concerned about  
            the recommendation due to the number of women diagnosed with  
            breast cancer prior to 50 years of age. In response, the  
            United States Senate approved an amendment to health reform  
            legislation that requires insurers to offer free mammograms  
            and other preventive services to women. This amendment and  
            legislation has not been finalized by Congress. 

           4)Related Legislation  . AB 56 (Portantino) in 2008 was similar to  
            this bill and was vetoed due to concerns about premium  
            pressures created by health mandates. Because AB 113 codifies  
            current practice and emphasizes preventive health practices,  
            upward premium pressure is unlikely. 
           


          Analysis Prepared by  :    Mary Ader / APPR. / (916) 319-2081