BILL ANALYSIS
AB 114
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 1, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 114 (Carter) - As Introduced: January 13, 2009
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 4-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill authorizes counties to adopt a restorative justice
program for juvenile offenders to address the needs of minors,
victims, and the community. Specifically, this bill:
1)States the restorative justice program shall be implemented
through a restorative justice protocol developed by the
juvenile court in conjunction with the prosecutor, defense
bar, probation, victims' groups, law enforcement, community
organizations and others.
2)Requires the program seek to repair the harm to the victim,
the offender, and the community.
3)Requires program requirements be tailored to the age, mental
capacity, and developmental maturity of the minor, the nature
of the offense, and the resources available to accomplish the
goals of the program.
FISCAL EFFECT
No direct state or local costs. To the extent a county opts to
adopt a program, and to the extent the proposed restorative
justice objectives, which are generally consistent with current
juvenile justice system goals, result in additional or improved
programming, local juvenile justice system costs (not
state-reimbursable) could increase.
The bill specifies that no GF shall be used to fund a
restorative justice program established by this bill and that a
county opting to establish a restorative justice program shall
AB 114
Page 2
apply to other appropriate public and private entities for
funding.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The balanced and restorative justice model, on
which this bill is based, assumes an understanding of crime as
an act against the victim and the community. The author
contends that while criminal justice practitioners have long
used techniques consistent with restorative justice, they lack
a coherent philosophical framework that supports restorative
practice and provides direction to guide all aspects of
juvenile justice practice.
2)Prior Legislation . AB 360 (Carter, 2008) was identical to AB
114. The governor's veto of AB 360 stated:
"This bill would allow counties to establish restorative
justice programs. While I am open to prevention and treatment
programs which are proven effective, the principles stated in
this bill appear to emphasize alternative to incarceration,
without ensuring public safety. It is also unclear whether
the restorative justice program, as proposed in this bill, is
limited to first or second-time nonviolent offenders."
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081