BILL ANALYSIS
AB 129
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 20, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 129 (Ma) - As Amended: May 4, 2009
Policy Committee: Judiciary
Vote: 9-0
Revenue and Taxation 8-0
Urgency: Yes State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill re-enacts a statute that, in conformity with federal
law, provides attorney-client privilege to specified
communications between a federally authorized tax practitioner
and a client, when the practitioner is representing the client
on a tax matter before state tax collection agencies.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible impact on state revenues and costs.
COMMENTS
1)Background . The IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998
provides a tax practitioner representing taxpayers on tax
matters before the IRS or in non-criminal court proceedings
with the same confidential communication privilege that
applies to attorneys and their clients. California added a
provision in 2000 to state law to allow a more limited
confidentiality privilege to tax practitioners representing
California taxpayers before the Board of Equalization,
Employment Development Department, and the Franchise Tax
Board. The provisions of the California confidentiality
privilege were, inadvertently, allowed to sunset on January 1,
2009.
2)Rationale . According to the author's office, the purpose of
this bill is to provide consistency with the federal statutes
that provide confidentiality protections for the
communications between taxpayers and their tax practitioners,
AB 129
Page 2
which encourages frank and open discussions in the preparation
of both their federal and state tax returns.
Analysis Prepared by : Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081