BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 139
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  January 13, 2010

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                             Anna Marie Caballero, Chair
                   AB 139 (Brownley) - As Amended:  January 4, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :  Local government: county boards: meetings.

           SUMMARY  :  Allows the County of Los Angeles board of supervisors  
          to hold one or more regular meetings at a location outside of  
          the county seat so long as the location is within the county.

           EXISTING LAW  requires all counties to hold regular meetings of  
          the board of supervisors at the county seat.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :

          1)The author states the County of Los Angeles (County) is the  
            largest county in the state with over 10 million residents.   
            The geography of the County ranges from coastline to the west,  
            desert in the north, mountains in the east, and an urbanized  
            south.  On March 3, 2009, the board of supervisors voted 5-0  
            to research the feasibility of holding board meetings outside  
            of the county seat, which is the City of Los Angeles.  The  
            motion was adopted in an attempt to encourage increased public  
            participation at board meetings and facilitate greater  
            oversight of proceedings.  The motion specifically mentions  
            the desire to be able to hold budget meetings in other county  
            communities, which would result in some increased costs.  The  
            motion also looked into the possibility of holding some  
            regular meetings in the evening, which also would result in  
            increased costs, principally for staff overtime.

          2)Section 25081 of the Government Code was added to the  
            Political Code in 1907 as Section 4034 as part of the  
            establishment of a uniform system of county and township  
            governments.  In 1947, Section 4034 of the Political Code was  
            reorganized into Section 20581 as part of a large revision to  
            the organization, operation, and maintenance of a system of  
            state and local government.  The language of Section 25081 as  
            it reads today is identical, minus some grammatical  
            restructuring, to the language of Section 4034 as added in  
            1907.  There are a few court cases citing Section 25081, but  








                                                                  AB 139
                                                                  Page  2

            these are merely citations and the cases do not challenge the  
            plain reading of the section.  It goes without saying that  
            what may have worked for counties and the holding of regular  
            board of supervisors meetings in 1907 might not hold true for  
            board of supervisors in 2010.  The board of supervisors for  
            the County holds its regular meetings in downtown Los Angeles  
            at 9:30 a.m.  While close to the Metro public transportation  
            line, traffic congestion at the time meetings are held is  
            phenomenal, making it potentially difficult for the members of  
            the public to attend.  The Committee may wish to consider  
            allowing all counties the opportunity to hold a regular  
            meeting of their boards of supervisors outside of the county  
            seat because other counties might face problems similar to the  
            County's.


          3)As written, AB 139 exempts all regular meetings of the County  
            board of supervisors meetings that are not held at the county  
            seat from the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act) (Chapter 9  
            (commencing with Section 54950) of Part 1 of Division 2 of  
            Title 5 of the Government Code).  Thus, if AB 139 is signed  
            with the language it contains now, these alternative location  
            regular meetings would not have to comply with the timeline  
            for posting the agenda, restrictions on closed session, as  
            well as other protections and procedures provided for under  
            the Brown Act.

          4)PROPOSED COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS  :  On page 2, strike out lines 3  
            to 8, inclusive, and insert:

          By ordinance the board shall provide for the holding of regular  
            meetings of the board at the county seat. The board may change  
            the place for the holding of one or more regular meetings of  
            the board to a location within the county other than the  
            county seat only if all of the following occur:

          (a) The change of location of the regular meeting is adopted by  
            ordinance, resolution, bylaws, or by whatever other rule is  
            required for the conduct of business by that body.

          (b) Notice of the location change is posted no later than the  
            prior regular meeting of the board.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :









                                                                  AB 139
                                                                  Page  3

           Support
           
          County of Los Angeles [SPONSOR]

           Opposition
           
          None on file
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Jennifer R. Klein / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958