BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 147|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 147
          Author:   Saldana (D), et al
          Amended:  9/1/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENV. QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 7/6/09
          AYES:  Simitian, Corbett, Hancock, Lowenthal, Pavley
          NOES:  Runner, Ashburn
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE :  8-4, 8/17/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Corbett, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza, Price, Wolk,  
            Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Denham, Runner, Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wyland

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  42-32, 6/3/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Hazardous waste:  electronic waste

           SOURCE  :     Californians Against Waste


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires manufacturers and producers  
          of electronic devices to submit information about the  
          hazardous characteristics of the device to the Department  
          of Toxic Substances Control.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 9/1/09 add language that  
          establishes criteria for when the Department of Toxic  
          Substances Control may request information from an  
          electronic device manufacturer for the purposes of  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 147
                                                                Page  
          2

          determining compliance.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law, pursuant to the Electronic Waste  
          Recycling Act (Section 42460 et seq. of the Public  
          Resources Code):

          1. Defines "covered electronic device" as a video display  
             device containing a screen greater than four inches,  
             measured diagonally, as determined by the Department of  
             Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), except for video  
             display devices that are in a motor vehicle or contained  
             within specified large appliances or industrial,  
             commercial or medical equipment.  (Section 42463(f) of  
             the Public Resources Code) 

          2. Prohibits a person from selling a new or refurbished  
             covered electronic device if the manufacturer is not in  
             compliance with the Act (Section 42465 of the Public  
             Resources Code).

          3. Requires a manufacturer of a covered electronic device  
             to submit a report to the California Integrated Waste  
             Management Board (CIWMB) an annual report that includes:  


             A.    An estimate of the number of covered electronic  
                devices sold by the manufacturer in the state during  
                the previous year.

             B.    A baseline or set of baselines that show the total  
                estimated amounts of mercury, cadmium, lead,  
                hexavalent chromium, and PBBs [polybrominated  
                biphenyls] used in covered electronic devices  
                manufactured by the manufacturer in that year and the  
                reduction in the use of those hazardous materials  
                from the previous year.

             C.    A baseline or set of baselines that show the total  
                estimated amount of recyclable materials contained in  
                covered electronic devices sold by the manufacturer  
                in that year and the increase in the use of those  
                recyclable materials from the previous year.

             D.    A baseline or a set of baselines that describe any  







                                                                AB 147
                                                                Page  
          3

                efforts to design covered electronic devices for  
                recycling and goals and plans for further increasing  
                design for recycling.

             E.    Make information available to consumers, that  
                describes where and how to return, recycle, and  
                dispose of the covered electronic device and  
                opportunities and locations for the collection or  
                return of the device in a specified manner.

             F.    For the purposes of complying the Act, allows a  
                manufacturer to submit a report to the IWMB that  
                includes only those covered electronic devices that  
                include specified compounds listed in #3B above that  
                are exempt from the European Union's (EU) Directive  
                2002/95/EC (the Reduction  of Hazardous Substances  
                Directive (RoHS Directive) if both of the following  
                conditions are met:

                (1)      The manufacturer submits written  
                   verification to DTSC that demonstrates, to the  
                   satisfaction of the department, that the  
                   manufacturer is in compliance with the RoHS  
                   Directive and any amendments to that directive,  
                   for those covered electronic devices for which it  
                   is not submitting a report to the CIWMB.

                (2)      DTSC certifies that the manufacturer is in  
                   compliance with the RoHS Directive, and any  
                   amendments to that directive, for those covered  
                   electronic devices for which the manufacturer is  
                   not submitting a report to the board pursuant to  
                   this subdivision.

          Existing law, pursuant to the Electronic Waste Law (Section  
          25214.9 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code): 

          1. Requires DTSC to adopt regulations that prohibit an  
             electronic device, as defined in Section 42463 of the  
             Public Resources Code, from being sold if the electronic  
             device is prohibited from being sold in the EU under the  
             RoHS Directive due to the presence of certain heavy  
             metals in the device.
           







                                                                AB 147
                                                                Page  
          4

          2. Prohibits DTSC, in adopting regulations, from requiring  
             the manufacture or sale of an electronic device that is  
             different than, or otherwise not prohibited by, the EU  
             under the RoHS Directive. 

          3. Prohibits DTSC from adopting any regulations that impose  
             any requirements or conditions that are in addition to,  
             or more stringent than, the requirements and conditions  
             expressly authorized by the Electronic Waste Law.   
             (Section 25214.10 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code)

          This bill:  

          1. Requires a manufacturer of a covered electronic device  
             to prepare, and at the request of DTSC, based on DTSC's  
             reasonable cause to believe that a specific device is  
             prohibited from sale, to submit within 28 days,  
             documentation or other information typically maintained  
             by the manufacturer's industry under Directive  
             2002/95/EC, adopted by the European Parliament and the  
             Council of the European Union on January 27, 2003,  
             demonstrating that the device is not prohibited from  
             sale.

          2. Provides that DTSC may extend the 28-day response time  
             upon request of the manufacturer.

          3. Specifies that the DTSC's request shall focus only on  
             the specific substance in a specific product part that  
             gives rise to reasonable cause to believe that the  
             specific electronic device is prohibited from sale.

          4. Specifies that a manufacturer's failure to submit  
             documentation required under this bill is not grounds  
             for prohibiting the sale of an electronic device.

          5. Requires DTSC to treat as confidential, any information  
             provided under this bill that is a trade secret and that  
             is identified by the manufacturer as a trade secret.   
             Requires information that is not a trade secret to be  
             available to the public pursuant to the California  
             Public Records Act.

           NOTE:  Please refer to the Senate Environmental Quality  







                                                                AB 147
                                                                Page  
          5

                 Committee analysis for background information.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

             Major Provisions                2009-10     2010-11     
             2011-12               Fund  

            Review of technical           up to $100 per  
            yearSpecial*
            documentation

            * Electronic Waste Recovery and Recycling Account

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/2/09)

          Californians Against Waste (source)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees, AFL-CIO
          Environmental Working Group
          Sierra Club California
          Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition 
          

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          in order for DTSC to effectively enforce the existing  
          hazardous materials ban and inform the Green Chemistry  
          Initiative, DTSC needs authority to request documentation  
          from electronics manufacturers detailing the amount of  
          hazardous materials contained in their products.   
          Manufacturers are currently providing this information upon  
          request in the EU per its "Restriction on the Use of  
          Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic  
          Equipment" Directive 2002/95/EC (RoHS).  Without this  
          authority, DTSC must resort to expensive product-by-product  
          testing to determine the hazardous materials content, if  
          any, of a consumer electronic item sold in the state.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 







                                                                AB 147
                                                                Page  
          6

          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Blumenfield, Brownley,  
            Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Coto,  
            Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fuentes,  
            Furutani, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huffman, Jones,  
            Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning,  
            Nava, John A. Perez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Skinner, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico,  
            Bass
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Conway, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson,  
            Fletcher, Fuller, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore,  
            Hagman, Harkey, Huber, Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller,  
            Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Silva, Smyth,  
            Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Block, Buchanan, Fong, Hall, Solorio,  
            Yamada


          TSM:mw  9/2/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****