BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 147
                                                                  Page 1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 147 (Saldana)
          As Amended  September 1, 2009
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |42-32|(June 3, 2009)  |SENATE: |23-15|(September 3,  |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2009)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:    E.S. & T.M.  

           SUMMARY  :  Requires manufacturers and producers of electronic  
          devices to submit information showing that the electronic device  
          is not prohibited for sale should the Department of Toxic  
          Substances Control (DTSC), based on DTSC's reasonable cause to  
          believe that the device is prohibited from sale, request the  
          information.  
           
          The Senate amendments  :  


           1)Define "reasonable cause" as knowledge of any of the  
            following:



             a)   Hazardous substance enforcement activities by another  
               state or country for the same or similar electronic device  
               that indicate that the electronic device may be prohibited  
               from sale;



             b)   Conflicting publicly available documentation regarding  
               hazardous substances for a specific electronic device that  
               indicates that the electronic device may be prohibited from  
               sale; 



             c)   Homogenous material level testing of a specific  
               electronic device regarding hazardous substances, conducted  
               according to the International Electro technical  
               Commission's IEC 62321 or equivalent method that indicates  








                                                                  AB 147
                                                                  Page 2

               that one or more homogenous materials may result in the  
               electronic device being prohibited from sale;



             d)   Information from other companies or competitors, if it  
               is a documented allegation, based on homogenous materials  
               reports, for a specific electronic device, that indicate  
               that the electronic device may be prohibited from sale;  
               and,



             e)   Other comparable justification to question whether a  
               specific electronic device is prohibited from sale.



          2)Require a manufacturer to submit information requested by DTSC  
            only if DTSC's request for information is based on reasonable  
            cause, as defined.



          3)Specify that the information that a manufacturer is required  
            to submit is information typically maintained by the  
            manufacturer's industry under Directive 2002/95/EC, adopted by  
            the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union  
            (EU) on January 27, 2003 (RoSH Directive), showing that the  
            electronic device is not prohibited from sale.



          4)Authorizes DTSC, upon request of the manufacturer, to extend  
            the 28-day response time to the request for information.



          5)Specify that a manufacturer's failure to submit required  
            documentation is not grounds for prohibiting the sale of an  
            electronic device.



          6)Delete provisions of the bill that: 








                                                                  AB 147
                                                                  Page 3



             a)   Define electronic equipment and other terms for the  
               purposes of the section;

             b)   Require a producer of specified electronic equipment to  
               prepare and submit specified information about the  
               hazardous content and hazardous characteristics of the  
               device; and,

             c)   Prohibit DTSC from imposing any requirements or  
               conditions that are in addition to, or more stringent than,  
               the requirements of the bill.
           
          AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill required manufacturers and  
          producers of electronic devices to submit information to DTSC  
          about the hazardous characteristics of the device.
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, up to $100,000 per year for DTSC to review technical  
          documentation (Electronic Waste Recovery and Recycling Account).

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author's office, "Current California  
          law prohibits hazardous materials from electronic devices with a  
          video screen larger than 4, and just last year the legislature  
          enacted the Green Chemistry Initiative, which requires DTSC to  
          regulate chemicals of concern in consumer products....  In order  
          for DTSC to effectively enforce the existing hazardous materials  
          ban and inform the Green Chemistry Initiative, it needs  
          authority to request documentation from electronics  
          manufacturers detailing the amount of hazardous materials  
          contained in their products?Without this authority, DTSC is only  
          able to resort to expensive product by product testing to  
          determine the hazardous materials content, if any, of a consumer  
          item sold in the state."

           

           The RoHS Directive, or the "Restriction on the Use of Certain  
          Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment,"  
          Directive 2002/95/EC, was adopted by the EU in 2003 and took  
          effect on July 1, 2006.  RoSH aims at controlling the use of  
          hazardous substances in the production of new electrical and  
          electronic equipment and prohibits the sale of those products  
          that contain more than specified levels of mercury, lead,  








                                                                  AB 147
                                                                  Page 4

          hexavalent chromium, cadmium and a range of flame retardants,  
          such as polybrominated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl  
          ethers.  Currently, RoSH requirements only apply to products  
          sold in the EU.  As a result, other countries and states,  
          including California, are examining RoSH-type standards  
          consistent with the EU's requirements.
           
           California's electronic waste, or e-waste, laws were established  
          by SB 20 (Sher), Chapter 526, Statutes of 2003, and SB 50  
          (Sher), Chapter 863, Statutes of 2004.  Along with collection  
          and fee requirements, the California e-waste laws required DTSC  
          to adopt regulations prohibiting a covered electronic device (a  
          video display device containing a screen greater than four  
          inches) from being sold in California if that device is  
          prohibited from being sold in the EU due to the presence of  
          lead, mercury, cadmium or hexavalent chromium above certain  
          maximum concentration values.  DTSC's regulations took effect  
          January 1, 2007, and only apply to covered electronic devices.   
          Therefore, many electronic products are not regulated under  
          California's current laws.

          Over the past several years, the California Legislature has  
          considered numerous bills that would have expanded California's  
          e-waste laws to align the state's e-waste standards with those  
          in Europe.  This bill requires manufacturers and producers to  
          report data on electronic devices sold in the state, based on  
          DTSC's reasonable cause to believe that that the device is  
          prohibited from sale.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Shannon McKinney / E.S. & T.M. / (916)  
          319-3965 


                                                               FN: 0003035