BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 170|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 170
          Author:   Mendoza (D)
          Amended:  As introduced
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 6/9/09
          AYES: Corbett, Harman, Florez, Leno, Walters

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR :  77-0, 3/23/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Court reporters:  rough draft transcript

           SOURCE  :     California Court Reporters Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides that, until January 1, 2017,  
          a court reporter's instant visual display of testimony or  
          proceedings (also known as "realtime reporting"), or both,  
          may not be certified and cannot be used, cited,  
          distributed, or transcribed as the official transcript of  
          the proceedings.  This bill prohibits the citation or use  
          of an instant visual display of testimony or proceedings,  
          or both, to rebut or contradict the official certified  
          transcript of the proceedings.  This bill also provides  
          that a rough draft transcript may not be distributed as the  
          official certified transcript of the proceedings.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law provides that the report of the  
          official reporter, or the official reporter pro tempore, of  
          any court, duly appointed and sworn, when transcribed and  
          certified as being a correct transcript of the testimony  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 170
                                                                Page  
          2

          and proceedings in the case, is prima facie evidence of  
          that testimony and proceedings.  (Code Civ. Proc. Sec.  
          273(a).)

          Existing law provides that a rough draft transcript shall  
          not be certified and cannot be used, cited, or transcribed  
          as the official certified transcript of the proceedings,  
          and shall not be cited or used in any way or at any time to  
          rebut or contradict the official certified transcript.   
          (Code Civ. Proc.  Sec. 273(b).)

          This bill adds that a rough draft transcript cannot be  
          distributed as the official certified transcript of the  
          proceedings.

          This bill provides that the instant visual display of the  
          testimony or proceedings shall not be certified and cannot  
          be used, cited, distributed, or transcribed as the official  
          certified transcript of the proceedings.  This bill would  
          additionally state that the instant visual display of the  
          testimony or proceedings shall not be cited or used in any  
          way or at any time to rebut or contradict the official  
          certified transcript of the proceedings.

          This bill would remain in effect until January 1, 2017.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/10/09)

          California Court Reporters Association (source) 
          Judicial Council of California


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office:   


               Court reporters have noticed an increase by attorneys  
               referring to instant visual display transcripts as  
               evidence.  Because these transcripts are generated in  
               real-time, they are not always accurate, which is why  
               corrections are made and the official transcript is  
               certified.  Real-time is a service that many court  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 170
                                                                Page  
          3

               reporters provide the bench and the parties.  But, the  
               final result of their [court reporters'] work is the  
               official record, which needs to trump a real-time  
               rough draft.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, De La Torre, De Leon,  
            DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher,  
            Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani,  
            Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight,  
            Krekorian, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza,  
            Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A.  
            Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Davis, Price, Villines


          RJG:nl  6/10/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
















                                                           CONTINUED