BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 189
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 189 (Budget Committee)
          As Amended  September 8, 2009
          2/3 vote.  Urgency 
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |     |(May 4, 2009)   |SENATE: |37-0 |(October 14,   |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2009)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
                    (vote not relevant)
           
           Original Committee Reference:     RLS.  

           SUMMARY  :  Make statutory changes regarding the cost of issuing  
          bonds for the State Treasurer.  

           The Senate amendments  delete the Assembly version of this bill,  
          and instead: 

          1)Increase from 2% to 3%, until June 30, 2013, the amount which  
            may be appropriated for fees, costs, and other similar  
            expenses incurred in connection with a credit enhancement or  
            liquidity agreement linked to a bond sale.

            Without this provision, the Treasurer may be unable to extend  
            existing debt to manage the current cash situation.

          2)Add an urgency clause, allowing this bill to take effect  
            immediately upon enactment.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill expressed the intent of the  
          Legislature to enact statutory changes relating to the Budget  
          Act of 2009.  
           
           FISCAL EFFECT  :

          1)The provisions affecting the Treasurer's ability to extend  
            existing debt will save the state billions of dollars.  If  
            these provisions are not approved, the Treasurer will be  
            required to either:

             a)   Retire that debt at a cost of approximately $2 billion.   
               These funds will likely come from planned GO bonds.  These  
               bond funds are intended to fund projects throughout the  
               state, and would have to be diverted for this purpose  








                                                                  AB 189
                                                                  Page  2

               instead; or,

             b)   Pay interest and other costs on these existing debts at  
               an increased rate with a current year cost of $150 million,  
               2010-11 costs of over $600 million, and increasing interest  
               costs each year there-after until these debts are retired.   



           Analysis Prepared by  :   Adam Dondro / BUDGET / (916) 319-2099


                                                               FN: 0003206