BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    







        ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
       |Hearing Date: June 8, 2009     |Bill No:AB                        |
       |                               |252                               |
        ------------------------------------------------------------------ 


                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS 
                               AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
                         Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod, Chair
                                           
                         Bill No:        AB 252Author:Carter
                   As Introduced:     February 11, 2009 Fiscal: Yes

       
       SUBJECT:    Practice of medicine: cosmetic surgery: employment of  
       physicians and surgeons.
       
       SUMMARY:  Authorizes the revocation of the license of a physician  
       and surgeon who practices medicine with a business organization  
       that offers to provide or provides outpatient elective cosmetic  
       medical procedures or treatments (cosmetic procedures), as defined,  
       knowing that the practice is owned or operated in violation of the  
       prohibition against the corporate practice of medicine (CPM);  
       states that a physician and surgeon who contract to serve as, the  
       medical director of a business organization that he or she does not  
       own and that offers to provide or provides outpatient cosmetic  
       procedures that may only be provided by the holder of a valid  
       physician's and surgeon's certificate under this bill is deemed to  
       have knowledge that the business organization is in violation of  
       the prohibition against the CPM; provides that a business  
       organization that offers to provide, or provides cosmetic  
       procedures, that is owned or operated in violation of the  
       prohibition against the CPM, and that contracts with, or otherwise  
       employs, a physician and surgeon to facilitate its offers to  
       provide, or the provision of, cosmetic procedures that may only be  
       provided by the holder of a valid physician's and surgeon's  
       certificate is guilty of violation of the prohibition against  
       knowingly making or causing to be made any false or fraudulent  
       claims for payment of a health care benefit.

       Existing law:
       
       1)Requires any person who practices medicine to hold a valid  
         certificate to practice medicine.  Establishes the Medical Board  
         of California (MBC) to license and certify physicians and  





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 2



         surgeons.    

       2)Prohibits corporations and other artificial legal entities from  
         having any medical professional rights, privileges, or powers  
         (known as the "prohibition against the corporate practice of  
         medicine.")   However, further provides that the Division of  
         Licensing of the MBC may, pursuant to regulations it has adopted,  
         grant approval for the employment of physicians and surgeons on a  
         salary basis by a licensed charitable institution, foundation, or  
         clinic if no charge for professional services rendered to  
         patients is made by that institution, foundation, or clinic.   
         Provides other certain exceptions to the prohibition against the  
         corporate practice of medicine.

       3)Makes it unprofessional conduct for any licensee to violate or  
         attempt to violate, to assist in or abet the violation of, or to  
         conspire to violate the prohibition against the CPM.  Requires  
         the MBC to take action against any licensee who is charged with  
         unprofessional conduct.  Specifies the types of actions that  
         constitute unprofessional conduct.

       4)Requires the MBC in conjunction with the Board of Registered  
         Nursing (BRN), and in consultation with the Physician Assistant  
         Committee (PAC) and professionals in the field, to review issues  
         and problems relating to the use of laser or intense light pulse  
         devices for elective cosmetic procedures by physicians and  
         surgeons, nurses, and physician assistants.

       5)Specifies that the review conducted by the MBC, the BRN and the  
         PAC shall include the appropriate level of physician supervision  
         needed, the appropriate level of training to ensure competency,  
         guidelines for standardized procedures and protocols that address  
         patient selection, education, instruction and informed consent,  
         use of topical agents, and procedures to be followed in the event  
         of complications or side effects from treatment and procedures  
         for governing emergency and urgent care situations.

       6)Requires the MBC and the BRN to promulgate regulations to  
         implement changes determined to be necessary with regard to the  
         use of laser or intense pulse light devices for elective cosmetic  
         procedures by physicians and surgeons, nurses and physicians  
         assistants.

       7)Makes it unlawful to knowingly make or cause to be made any false  
         or fraudulent claim for payment of a health care benefit.   
         Specifies that any person who violates this provision is guilty  





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 3



         of a public offense.  States that when the claim or amount at  
         issue exceeds $400, the offense is punishable by imprisonment in  
         the state prison for 2, 3, or 5 years, or by a fine not to exceed  
         $50,000; if a claim or amount at issue is $400 or less, the  
         offense is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not to  
         exceed six months, or by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by  
         both.  

       8)Defines cosmetic surgery for purposes of health insurance and  
         health plan coverage as any surgery that is performed to alter or  
         reshape normal structures of the body in order to improve the  
         patient's appearance.  

       This bill:

       1)Authorizes the  revocation  of the license of a physician and  
         surgeon who practices medicine with a business organization that  
         offers to provide, or provides outpatient elective cosmetic  
         procedures, knowing that it is owned or operated in violation of  
         the prohibition against the CPM.  Provides that a physician and  
         surgeon who contracts to serve as, or otherwise allows himself or  
         herself to be employed as, the medical director of a business  
         organization that he or she does not own and that offers to  
         provide or provides outpatient elective cosmetic procedures or  
         treatments that may only be provided by the holder of a valid  
         physician's and surgeon's certificate is deemed to have knowledge  
         that the business organization is in violation of the prohibition  
         against the CPM.

       2)Provides that a business organization that offers to provide, or  
         provides, outpatient elective cosmetic medical procedures or  
         treatments, that is owned or operated in violation of the CPM,  
         and that contracts with, or otherwise employs, a physician and  
         surgeon to facilitate its offers to provide, or the provision of,  
          cosmetic procedures that may only be provided by the holder of a  
         valid physician's and surgeon's certificate is guilty of  
         violating the prohibition against knowingly making or causing to  
         be made any false or fraudulent claim for payment of a health  
         care benefit.

       3)Defines "outpatient elective cosmetic procedures or treatments"  
         as a medical procedure or treatment that is performed to alter or  
         reshape normal structures of the body solely in order to improve  
         appearance. 

       FISCAL EFFECT:  According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee  





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 4



       analysis, "Unknown, likely minor increases in MBC enforcement  
       workload and fines related to violations of Corporate Practice of  
       Medicine prohibitions." 

       
       COMMENTS:
       
       1.Purpose.  The  American Society for Dermatologic Surgery  
         Association  (ASDSA), the Sponsor of this measure, indicates that  
         this bill provides the MBC and other consumer protection agencies  
         with enhanced enforcement tools necessary to pursue  
         well-resourced corporate entities unlawfully practicing medicine  
         through exotic, complicated and illegal business arrangements  
         with "employed" or "contracted" physicians.  The Sponsor points  
         out that this bill puts physicians who aid and abet the unlawful  
         invasion of the practice of medicine on zero-tolerance notice  
         regarding such conduct.    This bill strengthens enforcement of  
         current laws and going after the most frequent and pernicious  
         offenders, those unlawful, corporate-owned, chain med-spa  
         operators who want to practice medicine without proper licensure  
         or ownership structure.  The ASDSA argues that medical spa chains  
         have created business management and franchising schemes that  
         involve hiring "medical directors" who serve as "consultants" for  
         the medical spas to get around the prohibition against the CPM.   
         ASDSA opines that several large, corporate laser and medical spa  
         chains operate in flagrant violation of the prohibition against  
         the CPM because penalties are minor costs of doing business.  

       2.Background.  

          a)   Popularity of cosmetic procedures.  Newspaper articles  
            provided by the sponsor claims that the number of Americans  
            undergoing cosmetic procedures, including chemical peels,  
            laser procedures, Botox shots, and wrinkle-filler injections  
            continue to rise.  According to the  American Society of  
            Plastic Surgeons  ' (ASPS) website, there were 12 million  
            cosmetic surgeries performed in 2007, which represents a 7%  
            increase from 2006, and a 59% increase from 2000.  ASPS  
            indicates that the top five surgical procedures were breast  
            augmentation (348,000, up 6%), liposuction (302,000,  
            unchanged), nose reshaping (285,000, down 7%), eyelid surgery  
            (241,000, up 3%), and tummy tuck (148,000, up 1%).  Moreover,  
            ASPS points out that minimally-invasive cosmetic procedures  
            rose by 9%, to nearly 10 million procedures in 2007.   
            Hyaluronic acid fillers, popularly known as Restylane,  
            Hylaform, Hylaform Plus, and JuvedermTM, jumped from fifth  





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 5



            most popular in 2006 to second most popular in 2007.  The top  
            five minimally-invasive procedures were Botox (4.6 million, up  
            13 percent from 2006), hyaluronic acid fillers (1.1 million,  
            up 35 percent), chemical peel (1 million, down 4 percent),  
            laser hair removal (906,000, up 2 percent) and  
            microdermabrasion (897,000, up 10%).  

          b)   Medical Spas.  The increasing popularity of cosmetic  
            procedures or treatments, and the lucrative business they  
            offer have given rise to a new model of providing cosmetic  
            services outside the traditional physician settings and into  
            malls and local spas.  Medical spas or popularly known as  
            "medspas" are increasingly becoming the destination for  
            various cosmetic procedures or treatments.  

          Recognizing the growing popularity of medical spas, the MBC has  
            posted on its website a fact sheet.  The fact sheet indicates  
            that "medical spas are marketing vehicles for medical  
            procedures.  If they are offering medical procedures, they  
            must be owned by physicians.  The use of the term 'medical  
            spa' is for advertising purposes to make the procedures seem  
            more appealing.  In reality, however, it is the practice of  
            medicine.  There is no harm in seeking pampering or in wanting  
            to look better.  A visit to a spa may provide a needed respite  
            from our stressful lives, and treatments that make us look  
            better often make us feel better.  The Medical Board, however,  
            is concerned when medicine is being marketed like a pedicure,  
            and consumers are led to believe that being injected, lasered,  
            and resurfaced requires no more thought than changing hair  
            color.  According to the MBC's fact sheet, cosmetologists,  
            while licensed professionals and highly qualified in  
            superficial treatments such as facials and microdermabrasion,  
            may never inject the skin, use lasers, or perform  
            medical-level dermabrasion or skin peels.  Those types of  
            treatments must be performed by qualified medical personnel.   
            In California, that means a physician, or a registered nurse  
            or physician's assistant under the supervision of a physician.  
             Patients must know the qualifications of persons to whom they  
            are entrusting their health.  Those seeking cosmetic  
            procedures or treatments should know that the person  
            performing them is medically qualified and experienced."

       3.Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPM) Prohibition.  According to  
         the MBC's website, medical spas that offer medical procedures or  
         treatments involve the practice of medicine and must be performed  
         and owned by physicians.  The CPM doctrine generally prohibits  





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 6



         corporations or other entities that are not controlled by  
         physicians from practicing medicine to ensure that lay persons  
         are not controlling or influencing the professional judgment and  
         practice of medicine by licensed physicians and surgeons.  In an  
         effort to ensure medical spas are not violating the CPM doctrine,  
         one of the recommendations put forth by the MBC and BRN is to  
         give a higher priority to the investigation of corporate practice  
         of medicine violations in the medical spa clinics or other  
         settings using laser or intense pulse light devices and the  
         re-establishment of the Operation Safe Medicine Unit within the  
         MBC.
       
       4.Recent Review by the MBC, BRN and PAC of Issues Involving Use of  
         Certain Cosmetic Procedures.    SB 1423  (Figueroa) Chapter 873,  
         Statutes of 2006, required the MBC in conjunction with BRN to  
         promulgate regulations on or before January 1, 2009 to implement  
         changes relating to the use of laser or intense pulse light  
         devices for cosmetic procedures.  The MBC and the BRN have held  
         meetings, discussions and heard testimony from a number of  
         organizations representing nurses, physicians, physician  
         assistants, patients and the laser industry.  The discussions  
         included recommendations on training of personnel that use laser  
         equipments, the appropriate level of physician supervision at  
         these facilities, the appropriate advertising to inform patients  
         of the practitioners' credentials and degrees, who should own or  
         control these facilities, liability and establishing standardized  
         procedural rules.  The discussions and meetings revealed that  
         there is frequent disregard of the law in the use of laser or  
         intense pulse light devices in the treatment of patients.  

       One of the recommendations from MBC and BRN was the reestablishment  
         of the Operation Safe Medicine Unit (Unit).  The Unit was  
         established in 2000 by MBC as an enforcement program dedicated to  
         investigating the unlicensed practice of medicine, unlicensed  
         medical clinics and unlicensed persons soliciting patients.  In  
         addition, two statements were approved by both boards; the first  
         outlines the responsibilities of physicians in cosmetic  
         procedures, including the supervision of allied health staff  
         performing laser procedures, and the second is a revised  
         statement to better inform consumers on cosmetic procedures,  
         currently available on MBC's website but includes the following:   
         "An appropriate examination must be conducted before treatments  
         are performed.  This exam must be conducted by a physician, or  
         the doctor may delegate the examination to licensed nurse  
         practitioners or physician assistants.  Physicians may not  
         delegate this examination to registered nurses."





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 7




       5.Prior Efforts Dealing with Cosmetic Surgery Practices. In  
         California, cosmetic surgery can be performed by any licensed  
         physician, from a plastic surgeon to a pediatrician.  Many  
         physicians, who may or may not be trained in cosmetic procedures,  
         are conducting increasingly complex procedures in settings  
         outside of hospitals such as outpatient surgery centers and  
         doctors' offices.  It is also common for doctors performing  
         complex cosmetic surgeries to receive their only training from  
         weekend courses or instructional videos.  Currently, there are no  
         uniform standards for physicians' training related to cosmetic  
         surgery.  The Legislature attempted to regulate the practice of  
         cosmetic surgery in previous years with the introduction of  
         several bills including:

           a)   SB 1423  (Figueroa) Chapter 873, Statutes of 2006, required  
            the MBC in conjunction with the Board of Registered Nursing to  
            promulgate regulations on or before January 1, 2009 to  
            implement changes relating to the use of laser or intense  
            pulse light devices for cosmetic procedures by physicians and  
            surgeons, nurses, and physician assistants. 

           b)   SB 835  (Figueroa) of 1999, would have enacted the Cosmetic  
            Surgery Patient Disclosure Act, which would have required  
            physicians who perform cosmetic surgery, as defined, to  
            provide the MBC with specified information, including  
            training, board certifications, and number of procedures  
            performed, and requires the MBC to make this information  
            available to the public upon request and post the information  
            on the internet.  SB 835 was vetoed by then Governor Davis who  
            indicated that the methods prescribed by the measure were  
            unduly burdensome.

           c)   SB 836  (Figueroa) Chapter 856, Statutes of 1999, expanded  
            and revised the prohibition against fraudulent advertising by  
            health practitioners.

           d)   SB 837  (Figueroa) of 1999, would have required cosmetic  
            surgery procedures to be performed in a licensed acute care  
            hospital or in a licensed or accredited outpatient surgery  
            setting.  SB 837 died in the Assembly Appropriations  
            Committee.
          
       6.Similar Legislation this Session.   SB 674  (Negrete McLeod) has  
         passed the Senate Flloor and is on the way to the Assembly; and,  
         among other provisions requires the MBC to adopt regulations on  





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 8



         or before July 1, 2011 on the appropriate level of physician  
         availability necessary within clinics using laser or intense  
         pulse light devices for elective cosmetic surgery.  Requires the  
         MBC to post on its Internet Website a fact sheet to educate the  
         public about cosmetic surgery, and the risks involved with such  
         surgeries.  Makes a number of changes regarding the approval,  
         oversight and inspection of outpatient settings, as defined, by  
         the MBC and accreditation agencies approved by the MBC, and in  
         developing a plan of corrective action for any deficiencies found  
         by the accreditation agencies or the MBC during inspections or  
         otherwise.  Includes in the existing law definition of outpatient  
         settings fertility clinics that offer in vitro fertilization or  
         assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatments.  

       7.Prior Legislation.
       
           a)   AB 2398 (Nakanishi)  of 2008, is substantially similar to  
            the provisions of this bill, and would have authorized the  
            revocation of the license of a physician and surgeon who  
            practices medicine with a business organization that provides  
            outpatient elective cosmetic medical procedures or treatments.  
             AB 2398 failed passage on the Senate Floor.  
           
           b)   AB 2968  (Carter) of 2008 would have enacted the Donda West  
            Law, which would prohibit elective cosmetic surgery on a  
            patient unless, prior to surgery, the patient has completed a  
            physical examination by, and has received written clearance  
            for the procedure from, a licensed physician and surgeon.  AB  
            2968 was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger because of the  
            State budget crisis.

           c)   SB 1454  (Ridley-Thomas) would have required for purposes of  
            advertising that a health care practitioner, as specified,  
            provide the type of license under which the licensee is  
            practicing and the type of degree received upon graduation  
            from professional training and that a health care practitioner  
            who is practicing in an outpatient setting, as defined, and to  
            wear a name tag which includes his or her name and their  
            license status.  Requires the MBC to adopt regulations on the  
            appropriate level of physician supervision necessary within  
            clinics using laser or intense pulse light devices for  
            elective cosmetic surgery, and that the MBC establish as one  
            of its priorities the investigation of unlicensed activity  
            within such clinics by reestablishment of the Operation Safe  
            Medicine Unit (Unit).  Requires the MBC to post on its website  
            a fact sheet to educate the public about cosmetic surgery, and  





                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 9



            the risks involved with such surgeries.  Makes a number of  
            changes regarding the approval, oversight and inspection of  
            outpatient settings, as defined, by the MBC and accreditation  
            agencies approved by the MBC, and in developing a plan of  
            corrective action for any deficiencies found by the  
            accreditation agencies or the MBC during inspections, or  
            otherwise.  SB 1454 died on the Assembly Floor.      
          
       8.Arguments in Support.  Supporters, including the American  Academy  
         of Dermatology Association  ,  California Society for Dermatology   
         and  Dermatologic Surgery,  and the  California Society of Plastic  
         Surgeons,  indicate that this bill offers an appropriate penalty  
         for physicians who knowingly allow their names to serve as a  
         "front" for a corporation that operates medical spas.     

       9.Arguments in Opposition.  The  Department of Consumer Affairs   
         argues that this bill is duplicative of existing law and is  
         unnecessary.  It points that that the MBC and the BRN recently  
         completed a task force on the use of lasers and found that  
         diligent enforcement of violations of the prohibition against the  
         CPM and violations of nurses' and physician assistants' scopes of  
         practice will deter illegal action by medical spas.    
          
       
       SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION:
       
        Support:  

       American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association (Sponsor)
       American Academy of Dermatology Association
       American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
       American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
       California Academy of Eye Physicians and Surgeons
       California Academy of Physician Assistants
       California Medical Association
       California Society of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery
       California Society of Plastic Surgeons, Inc
       Medical Board of California
       Various individuals, including physicians

         Opposition:  

       Department of Consumer Affairs








                                                                         AB 252
                                                                         Page 10



       Consultant:Rosielyn Pulmano