BILL ANALYSIS
AB 322
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 22, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 322 (Silva) - As Introduced: February 18, 2009
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill replaces the term "taser" with "electronic control
device" (ECD) in Penal Code sections regulating dangerous
weapons.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible, if any, state or local cost.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . According to the author, this bill is simply
intended to replace a registered trademark brand name in the
Penal Code with a generic term for a product that multiple
manufacturers produce. The author contends this change should
be made, as a brand name should not be used to describe a
product.
According to TASER International, "AB 322 will replace the
term 'taser' with 'electronic control device' in the
appropriate sections throughout the Penal Code. TASER is a
brand name and does not describe the device itself. We,
therefore, request as a matter of good public policy that the
appropriate code sections refer to Electronic Control Devices
(ECD)."
2)Tasers - or ECDs - are hand-held devices that resemble a small
handgun, which propel two barbs intended to incapacitate a
person or animal through use of electric shock. The barbs are
intended to penetrate and attach to skin or clothing.
Tasers/ECDs send 50,000 volts of electrical current through
AB 322
Page 2
wires connecting the device to the barbs. The weapon is
effective from up to 35 feet, and through one inch of
clothing. The current flows into the body causing extreme
pain and a loss of muscular control. Removing the barbs
usually requires medical assistance.
TASER International and Stinger Systems are the two main
manufacturers of ECDs.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081