BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 327
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  May 18, 2009

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
                             Charles M. Calderon, Chair

                 AB 327 (Garrick) - As Introduced:  February 18, 2009

                                      SUSPENSE
          
          Majority vote.  Tax levy.  Fiscal committee.

           SUBJECT  :  Corporation tax:  minimum franchise tax 

           SUMMARY  :  Reduces the amount of annual minimum franchise tax  
          from $800 to $100.   Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Reduces the annual minimum franchise tax currently imposed on  
            every corporation incorporated, qualified to transact  
            business, or doing business in California from $800 to $100.

          2)Reduces the annual tax for a limited partnership (LP), a  
            limited liability company (LLC) not classified as a  
            corporation, a limited liability partnership (LLP), and a  
            qualified Subchapter S subsidiary consistent with the  
            reduction in corporate minimum franchise tax. 

          3)Reduces the annual tax for regulated investment companies,  
            real estate investment trusts, real estate mortgage investment  
            conduits, and financial asset securitization investment trusts  
            consistent with the reduction in corporate franchise tax. 

          4)Applies to taxable years beginning on and after January 1,  
            2009.

          5)Takes effect immediately as a tax levy.

           EXISTING LAW  imposes franchise tax on all corporations doing  
          business in California equal to 8.84% of the taxable income  
          attributable to California.  A minimum franchise tax of $800 is   
                  imposed on all corporations that are incorporated under  
          the laws of California, qualified to transact intrastate  
          business in California, or are doing business in California.   
          Taxpayers must pay the minimum franchise tax only if it is more  
          than their regular franchise tax liability.  Specifically:









                                                                  AB 327
                                                                  Page  2

          1)Limited exceptions exist with respect to imposition of the  
            minimum franchise tax.  For instance, credit unions and  
            nonprofit organizations are not subject to the minimum  
            franchise tax and a corporation is not subject to the minimum  
            franchise tax for its first taxable year.  However, even  
            though a corporation is not subject to the minimum tax in its  
            first taxable year, it will be subject to franchise tax in its  
            first taxable year based on its taxable income.

          2)According to the Franchise Tax Board (FTB), for taxable years  
            beginning on or after January 1, 1997, only taxpayers with net  
            income less than approximately $9,040 pay the minimum  
            franchise tax because the amount of measured tax owed would be  
            less than $800 ($9,039 x 8.84% = $799). 

          3)LPs, LLPs, and LLCs that are doing business in California,  
            registered or qualified to do business in California, or  
            formed in this state are subject to annual tax in an amount  
            equal to the minimum franchise tax, currently set at $800.   
            These entities (known as 'pass-through entities') are not  
            subject to any tax based on taxable income.  Rather, the items  
            of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit are passed-through  
            to the owners and reported on their respective income or  
            franchise tax returns. 

          4)Real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs) and  
            financial asset securitization investment trusts (FASITs) are  
            subject to and required to pay the minimum franchise tax.   
            Regulated investment companies (RICs) and real estate  
            investment trusts (REITs) organized as corporations are also  
            subject to and required to pay the minimum franchise tax.   
            RICs, REITs, REMICs, and FASITs are entities authorized by the  
            federal government for special tax treatment.  California  
            conforms in large part to federal tax provisions but subjects  
            each entity to payment of the annual minimum tax.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  FTB staff estimate that this will reduce General  
          Fund revenues by $800 million in fiscal year (FY) 2009-10, $550  
          million in FY 2010-11, and $550 million in FY 2011-12.

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)The author states that, "AB 327 would reduce the annual  
            minimum franchise tax on business in the state from $800 to  
            $100.  Savings from this tax reduction could be reinvested  








                                                                  AB 327
                                                                  Page  3

            back into the business, pay higher hourly wages or bonuses.   
            The amount may seem small but for many start-up or struggling  
            businesses the $700 savings can constitute a substantial  
            reinvestment.  Employers, employees, vendors and customers  
            will benefit from this reinvestment.  

          "Reduction of this tax encourages small businesses, especially  
            struggling businesses operating from the home or garage, to  
            file the proper paperwork and comply with existing state laws  
            governing the workplace.  In the long term, it is in the  
            state's best interest to reduce the number of businesses that  
            are operating in the underground economy."

          2)The author provided the following information on minimum tax  
            assessed by neighboring states:   

             a)   Arizona assesses a minimum tax of $50 on financial  
               institutions, corporations and LLCs that elect to be taxed  
               as corporations and imposes a business license fee of $15.

             b)   Oregon assesses a minimum excise tax of $10 on financial  
               institutions, corporations and LLCs that elect to be taxed  
               as corporations

             c)    Nevada does not assess tax on corporate income but  
               imposes a minimum fee of $100.

             d)   Utah imposes a minimum tax of $100 on "C" corporations. 

          3)According to FTB, the following states currently impose a  
            minimum franchise tax:

             a)   Illinois has a minimum 1% tax based on "paid-in" capital  
               (calculated using the shares of stock issued by the  
               corporation as disclosed in the annual statement reported  
               to the Illinois Secretary of State).  The tax ranges from a  
               minimum of $25 to a maximum of $1 million. 

             b)   Massachusetts imposes the greater of a corporate excise  
               tax of 9.5% based on taxable income or a minimum tax equal  
               to $456.

             c)   Beginning January 1, 2008, Michigan taxpayers are  
               subject to the Michigan Business Tax.  The Michigan  
               Business Tax is composed of two taxes:  A business income  








                                                                  AB 327
                                                                  Page  4

               tax of 4.9% on every taxpayer with business activity in the  
               state and a modified gross receipts tax of 0.80% on every  
               taxpayer having nexus with Michigan.  

             d)   Minnesota imposes a franchise tax on a corporation's  
               taxable income at the rate of 9.8%.  In addition, a minimum  
               franchise tax, ranging from $0 to $5,000, is imposed based  
               on the sum of the property determined by property, payroll,  
               and sales in the state.  

             e)   New York imposes a franchise tax of 7.1% based on net  
               income plus a fixed dollar minimum tax based on gross  
               payroll.  The fixed dollar minimum tax ranges from $100 to  
               $1,500.

          4)The proponents of this bill state that "providing small  
            businesses with additional incentives, such as the minimum  
            franchise tax reduction proposed by this bill, is one way to  
            help small businesses survive these tough economic times."   
            The proponents also assert that AB 327, by granting California  
            firms a modest annual savings, helps "to foster continued  
            economic growth and job creation."

          5)The opponents of this bill argue that it will result in  
            massive revenue losses without providing any apparent benefit  
            to the state, and thus, "is just another version of corporate  
            welfare at the expense of our? public education system." The  
            opponents contend that the minimum franchise tax is a very  
            minor cost of doing business and that many large corporations  
            hold a number of inactive subsidiaries on which they readily  
            pay the minimum franchise tax.  Furthermore, the minimum  
            franchise tax is currently waived for a "C" corporation during  
            the first two years of its existence, and there is no  
            rationale for waiving the tax beyond these two years.   
            Finally, the proponents assert that the "current $800 tax is a  
            nominal and fair amount for the privilege of conducting  
            business in the state" and "is warranted in exchange for  
            providing corporations with the legal and economic benefits of  
            becoming a limited partnership, limited liability partnership,  
            and limited liability company." 

          6)Committee staff notes all of the following:

             a)   The minimum franchise tax was enacted to ensure that all  
               corporations pay at least a minimum amount of franchise tax  








                                                                  AB 327
                                                                  Page  5

               for the privilege of doing business in this state,  
               regardless of the corporation's income or loss.  Thus, the  
               minimum franchise tax is not technically an "income tax",  
               but rather it is a tax on the right to exercise the powers  
               granted to a corporation doing business in California.   
               Even when a corporation earns no income, it still receives  
               the benefits of its corporate status, including the limited  
               liability protection under the laws of this state. 

             b)   California's minimum tax was increased from $100 to $200  
               in 1972.  It was increased to $300 in 1987, to $600 in  
               1989, and to $800 in 1990.   

             c)   It has never been shown that the minimum franchise tax  
               discourages businesses, particularly, since small  
               businesses can always organize as sole proprietorships to  
               avoid paying the minimum franchise tax. 

             d)   Because the franchise tax is the greater of the minimum  
               franchise tax or tax of 8.84% on the corporations' taxable  
               income, the actual beneficiaries of this bill are  
               corporations that report minimal taxable income and all  
               pass-through entities, regardless of the amount of income  
               earned.  Consequently, profitable entities that are formed  
               as LLCs, LPs or LLPs will reap tax savings of $700 every  
               taxable year.

          7)Related legislation.

          AB 2178 (Garrick), introduced in the 2007-08 Legislative  
            Session, would have reduced the minimum franchise tax from  
            $800 to $200.  AB 2178 was held under submission in this  
            Committee. 

          AB 1179 (Garrick), introduced in the 2007-08 Legislative  
            Session, is similar to AB 327.  AB 1179 was held in this  
            committee.   

          AB 1419 (Campbell), introduced in the 1997-98 Legislative  
            Session, would have reduced the minimum franchise tax for a  
            qualified corporation from $800 to $100.  AB 1419 failed  
            passage in the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee.

          8)FTB staff recommends one technical amendment to delete the  
            outdated language from the bill.  








                                                                  AB 327
                                                                  Page  6


          AMENDMENT 1

          On page 3, strike out lines 8 through 40, and on page 4, strike  
            out lines 1 through 17. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Associated Builders and Contractors of California
          National Federation of Independent Business

           Opposition 
           
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees,  
          AFL-CIO
          California Tax Reform Association
          California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO
          California Professional Firefighters
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Oksana Jaffe / REV. & TAX. / (916)  
          319-2098