BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 375
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 31, 2009

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
                                  Mike Feuer, Chair
                    AB 375 (Nielson) - As Amended:  March 23, 2009

           SUBJECT  :   Child custody: child sexual abuse

           KEY ISSUE  :  SHOULD THE COURT BE PREVENTED FROM CHANGING CUSTODY  
          ORDERS EX PARTE WHERE THE PARTY REQUESTING THE CHANGE IS ALLEGED  
          TO HAVE PERPETRATED A RECENT OR CONTINUING ACT OF DOMESTIC  
          VIOLENCE OR SEXUAL ABUSE AGAINST THE CHILD?

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  As currently in print this bill is keyed  
          non-fiscal.

                                      SYNOPSIS
          
          This bill seeks to ensure that custody orders cannot be changed  
          quickly and without an open hearing when an abusive parent seeks  
          to gain greater access to the child.  Existing law authorizes  
          the court to grant or modify a custody order on an ex parte  
          basis only when there is a showing of immediate risk that the  
          child will be removed from California or a showing of immediate  
          harm to the child.  "Immediate harm to the child" is defined to  
          include having a parent who has committed acts of domestic  
          violence or sexual abuse of a child.  This bill would prevent a  
          court from granting an ex parte request to modify a custody  
          order if the court makes a finding that the child in question is  
          a victim of domestic violence or sexual abuse that has occurred  
          within the last five years or is part of a demonstrated and  
          continuing or escalating pattern of abuse and the person seeking  
          to modify the order is alleged to have perpetrated the domestic  
          violence or sexual abuse against the child.  The bill provides  
          the court with a small, but necessary, amount of discretion to  
          grant such an order if it is necessary to protect the child.   
          Supporters include the California Protective Parents Association  
          and the Center for Judicial Excellence.  The earlier opposition  
          was to a previous version of the bill, which had eliminated all  
          judicial discretion.

           SUMMARY  :  Limits the ability of the court to grant an ex parte  
          request to modify a child custody order in cases of domestic  
          violence or child sexual abuse.  Specifically,  this bill  :  









                                                                  AB 375
                                                                  Page  2

          1)Provides that, unless there is a showing of immediate harm to  
            the child or immediate risk that the child will be removed  
            from the state, a court may not grant an ex parte request to  
            modify a child custody order if all of the following apply:

             a)   There is a finding of domestic violence or sexual abuse  
               against the child;
             b)   The court determines that the act of domestic violence  
               or sexual abuse is of recent origin or part of a  
               demonstrated and continuing or escalating pattern of acts  
               of domestic violence or sexual abuse against the child,  
               with "recent origin" defined as occurring within the last  
               five years; and
             c)   The modification request is made by a person who is  
               alleged to have perpetrated a recent act, or a pattern of  
               acts, of domestic violence or sexual abuse, and is alleged  
               to be seeking the modification to gain greater access to  
               the child.  

          2)If all the circumstances in #1(a) -(c) apply, requires the  
            court to conduct a hearing in open court regarding the  
            modification of the custody order.
           
          EXISTING LAW  provides that a court shall refrain from making an  
          order granting or modifying a custody order on an ex parte  
          basis, unless there has been a showing of immediate risk that  
          the child will be removed from the State of California, or a  
          showing of immediate harm to the child.  Defines "immediate harm  
          to the child" to include having a parent who has committed acts  
          of domestic violence or sexual abuse of the child, where the  
          court determines that the acts of domestic violence sexual abuse  
          are of recent origin or are part of a demonstrated and  
          continuing pattern of abuse.  (Family Code Section 3064.)

           COMMENTS  :  An ex parte order generally refers to an order  
          granted at the request of one party, without the other parties  
          to the action present.  Ex parte orders are an exception to the  
          basic rule of court procedure that both parties must be present  
          at any argument before the court.  Ex parte matters are  
          temporary orders pending a formal hearing and generally only  
          ordered if quick action, often without notice to the other  
          party, is required in a given situation.  

          Under current law, courts are generally prohibited from granting  
          or modifying a custody order on an ex parte basis.  However, the  








                                                                  AB 375
                                                                  Page  3

          court may proceed on an ex parte basis if there has been a  
          showing of immediate harm to the child or immediate risk that  
          the child will be removed from the state.  These orders can be  
          warranted when, for example, a parent with visitation has  
          threatened to take the child outside California, in particular  
          to a country that will not recognize California's custody  
          orders.  In this case, the court may need to act quickly without  
          giving the other parent notice, in order to prevent removal of  
          the child from the state. 

          This bill seeks to protect children from domestic violence and  
          sexual abuse by preventing a court from granting an ex parte  
          request to modify a custody order if (1) the court makes a  
          finding of domestic violence or sexual abuse against the child;  
          (2) the court determines that the act of domestic violence or  
          sexual abuse is of recent origin (within the last five years) or  
          part of a demonstrated and continuing or escalating pattern of  
          acts of domestic violence or sexual abuse against the child; and  
          (3) the modification request is made by a person who is alleged  
          to have perpetrated a recent act of domestic violence or sexual  
          abuse.  If all of these circumstances exist, the court is  
          required, before modifying the order, to conduct a hearing in  
          open court.

          The bill rightly provides the court with a small, but necessary,  
          amount of discretion to grant such an ex parte order if there is  
          immediate risk of harm to the child.  While such a situation  
          would be extremely rare, it is possible to imagine scenarios  
          where an abusive parent alleges that the other parent has  
          committed acts of domestic violence or child abuse and is  
          thereby able to prevent the parent seeking to protect the child  
          from being able to do so.  This is particularly necessary if the  
          abusive parent alleges the other parent has committed acts of  
          domestic violence or sexual abuse against the child in an effort  
          to remove the child from the court's jurisdiction.  This bill  
          would provide the court with the ability to prevent such a  
          potentially dangerous outcome in appropriate cases. 

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :  Supporters, including the California  
          Protective Parents Association and the Center for Judicial  
          Excellence, enthusiastically support the bill, noting that that  
          they "receive reports approximately monthly from distraught  
          parents in California who have lost custody to abusers in ex  
          parte hearings.  The children are taken from their safe homes  
          and placed at risk."  This bill, they argue, will prevent these  








                                                                  AB 375
                                                                  Page  4

          egregious situations.

           Opposition to Previous Version of the Bill  :  Opponents to a  
          previous version of the bill were concerned that the bill  
          eliminated all judicial discretion in an area where court  
          discretion is already - and appropriately - quite limited and  
          its exercise may well be necessary to prevent serious harm to  
          the child, including the removal of the child outside the reach  
          of a California court.  

           Previous related legislation  :  AB 2960 (La Malfa), Chap. 64,  
          Stats. 2008, ensured that custody orders can be changed quickly  
          when there is a showing of sexual abuse of the child by  
          clarifying that a court can change a custody order on an ex  
          parte basis when a child is the victim of sexual abuse.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support  

          California Protective Parents Association
          Center for Judicial Excellence
          Crime Victims United of California
          Helen Vine Detox Center
          Incest Survivors' Speakers Bureau of Yolo County
          Marin City Golden Gate Village Resident Council
          Mothers in Crisis Coalition
          Women Helping All People
          One individual

           Opposition (to a previous version of the bill)  :

          California Judges Association
          Family Law Section of the State Bar
          One individual
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :  Leora Gershenzon / JUD. / (916) 319-2334