BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
378 (Cook)
Hearing Date: 07/13/2009 Amended: 05/04/2009
Consultant: Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Human
Services 4-1
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: AB 378 requires public authorities and nonprofit
consortiums, in consultation with their advisory committees and
stakeholders, to develop training standards and core topics for
the training they provide to in-home supportive services (IHSS)
providers and recipients.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Fund
New requirement on Potential minor DSS workload increase
General
Public Authorities
Federal*
*Title XIX federal grant
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: This bill simply requires the individual public
authorities and nonprofit consortiums to develop training
standards and core topics for the training it currently
provides. It is unlikely to have a direct fiscal impact to the
state, outside of minimal DSS involvement in receiving
documentation from affected public authorities and nonprofit
consortiums whose are monitored to some degree, and whose rate
packages are approved, by DSS.
Existing statute specifies that "providing for training for
providers and recipients" is the responsibility of the nonprofit
consortiums and public authorities. This bill requires that they
individually develop training standards and core topics for
training. This bill does not mandate statewide standards or
training topics. The California Association of Public
Authorities for IHSS (CAPA) developed core training topics in
2008, and distributed them to its member counties as suggested
topic areas. It is likely that individual counties, since they
make at least some training available, have training topics and
standards. The bill is sufficiently vague that these current
practices might suffice to comply with it, since each public
authority or nonprofit consortium can develop its own standards
and topics.
Current statute allows these entities to implement the provision
in this bill. Existing statute does not, however, mandate that
providers and recipients attend offered training. To the extent
that public authorities and nonprofit consortiums, in
consultation with stakeholders, develop "training standards"
that increase the level of training offered to providers and
recipients, there could be cost pressure to fund that training.
It is possible that public authorities and nonprofit consortiums
could increase their rate packages to provide the newly adopted
training standards.
An identical bill, AB 182 (Ma 2008), was vetoed with the
following veto message:
Page 2
AB 378 (Cook)
While I support improved quality for In-Home Supportive Services
(IHSS) providers and training activities, I cannot support this
bill as it is unnecessary. California can already develop
training
standards for IHSS providers administratively at both the state
and local levels. This bill could lead to the development of
dozens of different training standards across the state. I
believe consistent training standards can be more effectively
developed at the state level. To that end, I am directing the
Department of Social Services, in consultation with consumers,
counties and other key stakeholders, to establish appropriate
training standards for IHSS providers
administratively to the extent resources are available to
accomplish this task.