BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 395
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 22, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                AB 395 (Fuentes) - As Introduced:  February 23, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Labor and  
          Employment   Vote:                            6-1

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes an awarding body to assist the Director of  
          the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) in the enforcement  
          of prevailing wage laws applying to apprenticeships through the  
          operation of the awarding body's approved labor compliance  
          program (LCP).  The bill also:

          1)Specifies that such assistance be provided only upon mutual  
            agreement of the LCP and the Chief of the Division of  
            Apprenticeship Standards (DAS).

          2)Specifies that the contractor may appeal the result of any  
            subsequent enforcement action through the appellate process  
            set forth in existing law.

          3)States that where the involvement of the Chief of DAS in an  
            enforcement action has been limited to a review of the  
            assessment and the matter has been resolved without  
            litigation, the awarding body shall deposit any penalties and  
            forfeitures recovered into its general fund.  
           
          FISCAL EFFECT  

          DIR indicates that the bill will result in additional costs,  
          totaling $200,000 in 2009-10 and about $370,000 in 2010-11 and  
          subsequent years. The costs are for 2  full time positions for  
          DAS review of enforcement actions taken by LCPs related to  
          apprentices, and for administrative hearings to review  
          enforcement actions that are appealed. 
           
          COMMENTS  








                                                                  AB 395
                                                                  Page  2


           1)Background  . Existing law generally requires the payment of  
            prevailing wages on public contracts over $1,000 (with higher  
            thresholds when the entity awarding the contract elects to  
            initiate and enforce its own labor compliance program).  The  
            Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) within DIR is  
            responsible for enforcing prevailing wage requirements.  The  
            Division of Apprenticeship Standards, within DIR, is  
            responsible for enforcing various state laws regarding the use  
            of apprentices on work projects.   

            Since 1989, state law has allowed political subdivisions of  
            the state that award public contracts to initiate and enforce  
            their own labor compliance programs (LCPs) in conjunction with  
            the DIR and DLSE. This authority relates to enforcement of  
            prevailing wage requirements for workers, but not to  
            requirements related to the use of apprentices on public works  
            projects.

            As part of the budget package adopted in February, legislation  
            was enacted which makes major changes to the LCP system of  
            prevailing wage enforcement.  SB2X 9 (Padilla) among other  
            things, moves responsibility for wage enforcement back to DIR.  
            New contracts will be subject to a fee accessed by DIR, which  
            will fund enforcement of the prevailing wage law on work  
            related to those contracts. 

            SB 9 X2 contains "grandfathering" language, which allows  
            previously approved in-house LCPs to be authorized by DIR to  
            continue operating their LCP in lieu of paying a fee under the  
            new system.  
           
          2)Rationale  . This bill is sponsored by the City of Los Angeles,  
            which has a labor compliance section responsible for enforcing  
            LCPs in relation to the city's public works projects.  The  
            city claims that its labor compliance section has been  
            effective in this role, recovering $4.3 million in wages for  
            workers employed in the city's public works projects. However,  
            while its LCP has authority to enforce prevailing wage laws  
            with respect to workers, it does not have authority to enforce  
            labor code violations affecting apprentices. The sponsor and  
            other supporters of the bill assert that when such  
            apprentice-related violations are found by LCPs, they must  
            forward their findings to DAS, which does not have the  
            staffing or resources to address the vast majority of  








                                                                  AB 395
                                                                  Page  3

            violations. This bill is intended to address this situation by  
            providing qualifying LCPs with the authority to enforce labor  
            laws related to apprentices.

           3)Prior legislation  . This bill is similar to AB 2369 (Fuentes)  
            from 2008. That measure was vetoed by the governor, who cited  
            the late budget and lack of time for review.

           Analysis Prepared by :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081