BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 395|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 395
          Author:   Fuentes (D)
          Amended:  7/6/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LABOR & INDUST. RELATIONS COMMITTEE  :  5-1, 6/25/09
          AYES:  DeSaulnier, Wyland, Ducheny, Leno, Yee
          NOES:  Hollingsworth

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  9-4, 8/27/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Corbett, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza, Price, Wolk,  
            Wyland, Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Denham, Runner, Walters
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  51-28, 6/1/09 - See last page for vote


          SUBJECT  :    Employment:  apprenticeship programs

           SOURCE  :     Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, City of Los Angeles


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes an awarding body to assist  
          the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations in  
          the enforcement of prevailing wage laws that apply to  
          apprenticeships, through the operation of the awarding  
          body's approved labor compliance program, as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 395
                                                                Page  
          2

          1. Requires, generally, the payment of prevailing wages, as  
             defined, on public works contracts over $1,000.

          2. Authorizes, and in some circumstances requires, awarding  
             bodies to adopt "Labor Compliance Programs" (LCPs) on  
             public works projects to ensure that the projects adhere  
             to prevailing wage standards required by state and  
             federal laws, regulations and directives, as well as  
             policies and provisions.  

          3. Specifies that an approved LCP must meet the following  
             criteria:

             A.    All bid invitations and public works contracts  
                issued must contain appropriate language about the  
                requirements of the public works chapter of the Labor  
                Code.

             B.    A pre-job conference shall be conducted with the  
                contractor or subcontractors to discuss federal and  
                state labor law requirements applicable to the  
                contract.

             C.    Contractors and subcontractors shall maintain and  
                furnish to the LCP a certified copy of each weekly  
                payroll with a statement of compliance signed under  
                penalty of perjury.

             D.    The LCP shall review and, if appropriate, audit  
                payroll records to verify compliance with the public  
                works chapter of the Labor Code.

             E.    The LCP shall require the awarding body to  
                withhold contract payments when payroll records are  
                delinquent or inadequate.
              
             F.    The LCP shall require the awarding body to  
                withhold contract payments equal to the amount of  
                underpayment and applicable penalties when the LCP  
                establishes that underpayment has occurred. 

          4. Provides that if an awarding body elects to initiate and  
             enforce its own labor compliance program, the prevailing  
             wage requirements shall not apply to projects of $25,000  







                                                                AB 395
                                                                Page  
          3

             or less when the work is for construction work, or to  
             any public works project of $15,000 or less when the  
             project is for alteration, demolition, repair or  
             maintenance work.          

          5. Authorizes the Director of the Department of Industrial  
             Relations (DIR) to appoint assistants necessary to  
             effectuate the purposes of state law governing  
             apprenticeships.

          This bill:

          1. Provides that an awarding body that implements a labor  
             compliance program may, with the approval and at the  
             discretion of the Chief of the Division of  
             Apprenticeship Standards (DAS), assist the Director of  
             DIR in the enforcement of a specified provision of law  
             (Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code) related to the  
             employment of apprentices on public works projects under  
             the terms and conditions prescribed by the Chief of DAS.

          2. Specifies that a contractor may appeal the result of any  
             subsequent enforcement action through the appellate  
             process set forth under existing law.

          3. States that where the involvement of the Chief of DAS  
             has been limited to a review of the assessment and the  
             matter has been resolved without litigation by or  
             against DAS, the awarding body shall enforce any  
             applicable penalties and shall deposit any penalties and  
             forfeitures recovered into its general fund.
          
           Comments

           Some contractors on public works projects fail to pay  
          applicable prevailing wages, maintain less than the  
          required ratio of journeymen to apprentices, or otherwise  
          violate the law relating public works, prevailing wages,  
          and the rights of apprentices.  Officials of labor  
          compliance programs occasionally encounter instances of  
          these violations.  While these officials currently have the  
          authority to enforce provisions of the Labor Code relating  
          to prevailing wage issues, the enforcement of  
          apprenticeship standards is under the jurisdiction of DAS.   







                                                                AB 395
                                                                Page  
          4

          Giving labor compliance officers the authority to enforce  
          apprenticeship standards, in specified circumstances and  
          with approval of the Chief of DAS, could be seen as a  
          logical follow-up to existing law.  The expansion of  
          enforcement authority should give some relief to affected  
          parties.  This may include both apprentices and also those  
          contractors who are more consistent in following the law  
          but who are at a competitive disadvantage compared to those  
          who are cutting their costs by failing to properly follow  
          apprenticeship standards.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions        2009-10      2010-11     2011-12      Fund  

          DIR joint enforcement of         $150-$200             
          $300-$400             $300-$400  General
          apprenticeship standards

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/27/09)

          Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, City of Los Angeles (source)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
          State Building and Construction Trades Council of  
          California

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/27/09)

          Western Electrical Contractors Association

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author, bill's sponsor, and  
          supporters of this bill state that LCPs often discover  
          numerous violations of the laws relating to  
          apprenticeships.  DAS has the authority to enforce  
          apprenticeship standards, but they insufficient staff to  
          handle the volume of complaints.  LCPs have staff to  
          investigate apprenticeship violations, but no authority to  
          do so.  The breach of these laws results in unfair  







                                                                AB 395
                                                                Page  
          5

          competition to law-abiding contractors.  Supporters cite  
          the success of the LCP of the City of Los Angeles.  It has  
          collected $4.3 million through its other enforcement  
          efforts.  This bill allows DAS to shift the burden of  
          dealing with violating contractors from itself to certain  
          LCPs, resulting in reduced costs to DAS and the state and  
          to better enforcement of law relating to apprenticeships.  


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Blumenfield, Brownley,  
            Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans, Feuer,  
            Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Hall, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu,  
            Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Nestande,  
            John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Price,  
            Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Conway, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson,  
            Fletcher, Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman,  
            Harkey, Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller, Niello, Nielsen,  
            Silva, Smyth, Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Block


          AGB:mw  8/28/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****