BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 395
                                                                  Page  1

          CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
          AB 395 (Fuentes)
          As Amended  July 6, 2009
          Majority vote
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |ASSEMBLY:  |51-28|(June 1, 2009)  |SENATE: |26-13|(September 4,  |
          |           |     |                |        |     |2009)          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
            
           Original Committee Reference:   L. & E.  

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes an awarding body to assist the Director of  
          the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) in the enforcement  
          of prevailing wage laws that apply to apprenticeships, through  
          the operation of the awarding body's approved labor compliance  
          program (LCP).  

           The Senate amendments :

          1 Specify that such assistance may only occur at the discretion  
            of the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards  
            (DAS).

          2)Specify that such assistance may only occur under the terms  
            and conditions prescribed by the Chief of the DAS.

           AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY  , this bill:

          1 Provided that an awarding body that implements a LCP may, with  
            the approval of the Chief of the DAS, assist the Director of  
            DIR in the enforcement of specified provisions of law related  
            to the employment of apprentices on public works projects.

          2)Specified that a contractor may appeal the result of any  
            subsequent enforcement action through the appellate process  
            set forth under existing law.

          3)Stated that where the involvement of the Chief of DAS has been  
            limited to a review of the assessment and the matter has been  
            resolved without litigation by or against DAS, the awarding  
            body shall deposit any penalties and forfeitures recovered  
            into its general fund.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  








                                                                  AB 395
                                                                  Page  2

          Committee, DIR indicates that it will result in additional costs  
          totaling $200,000 in 2009-10 and up to $400,000 in 2010-11 and  
          subsequent years.

           COMMENTS  :  This bill is sponsored by the City of Los Angeles.   
          The Labor Compliance Section of the Bureau of Contract  
          Administration's Office of Contract Compliance is part of the  
          City of Los Angeles' Department of Public Works.  The Section  
          operates the City's State-Certified LCP and is tasked with the  
          enforcement of the sections of the California Labor Code  
          pertaining to the payment of the prevailing wage on the City's  
          public works projects.  According to the sponsor, the Labor  
          Compliance Section is very effective in its enforcement efforts;  
          over the past eight years, it has collected $4.3 million in  
          restitution for 4,216 workers employed on the City's public  
          works projects.

          According to the sponsor, while the City's Labor Compliance  
          Section has the authority to enforce provisions of the  
          California Labor Code relating to prevailing wage issues, the  
          enforcement of apprenticeship labor issues is under the  
          jurisdiction of the State's Division of Apprenticeship Standards  
          (DAS).  As part of its routine enforcement activities, the Labor  
          Compliance Section occasionally encounters violations relating  
          to the payment of the prevailing wage to apprentices on public  
          works projects of the City.  However, it does not currently have  
          the statutory authority to enforce those sections of the Labor  
          Code.

          Therefore, the sponsor argues that this bill will allow it to  
          partner with DAS (which neither has the budget nor staff to  
          adequately address apprenticeship standards violations  
          statewide) to enforce the sections of the Labor Code dealing  
          with apprenticeship issues, similar to what it currently enjoys  
          with the DLSE.  This bill will allow certified LCPs (such as the  
          City of Los Angeles' Labor Compliance Section), with the  
          approval of DAS, to enforce specified laws pertaining to  
          apprenticeships.  According to the sponsor, this authority would  
          not only benefit the apprentices, but the honest contractors  
          with whom they are working together to build new public works  
          projects, which ultimately benefit all Californians.

          Other supporters similarly argue that LCPs often discover  
          violations of the laws pertaining to the employment of  
          apprentices, yet they have no jurisdiction in such matters.   








                                                                  AB 395
                                                                  Page  3

          Instead, they are required to forward their discoveries to DAS,  
          who has neither the staff nor the budget to adequately address  
          the vast majority of such violations.  While trained and  
          experienced LCPs have the staff and knowledge to address these  
          violations, there is currently no provision in existing law to  
          allow them to do so.  This bill provides that necessary legal  
          authority.

          This bill is similar to AB 2369 (Fuentes) of 2008 which was  
          vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger.

           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Ben Ebbink / L. & E. / (916) 319-2091 


                                                                FN: 0002578