BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 474|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: AB 474
Author: Blumenfield (D), et al
Amended: 9/4/09 in Senate
Vote: 21
SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE : 3-1, 7/8/09
AYES: Wiggins, Kehoe, Wolk
NOES: Aanestad
NO VOTE RECORDED: Cox
ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 61-14, 5/21/09 - See last page for vote
SUBJECT : Contractual assessments: water efficiency
improvements
SOURCE : California Municipal Utilities Association
Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California
DIGEST : This bill expands the authorization that allows
public agencies to enter into contractual assessments to
finance the installation of specified improvements to now
include water efficiency improvements.
Senate Floor Amendments of 9/4/09 revise real estate
disclosure notice requirements and delete urgency clause.
ANALYSIS : Current law authorizes cities and counties to
use "contractual assessments" to finance public
improvements on developed parcels when the costs and time
CONTINUED
AB 474
Page
2
delays to create an assessment district will be
prohibitively large relative to the cost of the public
improvements to be financed (SB 837 [McQuorqudale], Chapter
1388, Statutes of 1987). Contractual assessments may be
levied only with the free and willing consent of the
affected property owners.
To use contractual assessments, a city council or county
board of supervisors must adopt a resolution, which:
1. Determines that it would be convenient, advantageous,
and in the public interest to designate an area within
which officials and property owners may enter into
contractual assessments and make related financing
arrangements.
2. Identifies the kinds of public works which may be
financed.
3. Describes the boundaries of the area within which
contractual assessments may be entered into.
4. Describes the proposed financing arrangements.
5. States the time and place for a public hearing.
6. Directs an official to prepare a detailed report about
the contractual assessment program.
The report on the proposed contractual assessment program
must contain:
1. A map of the area where contractual assessments will be
offered.
2. A draft contract specifying the terms and conditions.
3. A list of the types of facilities which may be financed.
4. The official authorized to enter into contractual
assessments on behalf of the county or city.
5. The maximum aggregate dollar amount of contractual
assessments.
AB 474
Page
3
6. A method for prioritizing requests from property owners
for financing.
7. A plan for raising a capital amount required to pay for
work performed pursuant to contractual assessments.
After holding a public hearing, the legislative body may
adopt a resolution confirming the program as detailed in
the report, may confirm a modified version of the report,
or may abandon the proceedings.
Last year, legislators authorized city and county officials
to use contractual assessments to finance the installation
of distributed generation renewable energy sources or
energy efficiency improvements to residential, commercial,
industrial, or other real property (AB 811 [Levine],
Chapter 159, Statutes of 2008). Local officials also want
to use contractual assessments to finance water efficiency
improvements on private property.
This bill:
1.Authorizes the use of contractual assessments to finance
the installation of water efficiency improvements that
are permanently fixed to residential, commercial,
industrial, agricultural, or other real property.
2.Specifies that, for the purpose of financing the
installation of water efficiency improvements, "public
agency" means a city, county, city and county, municipal
utility district, community services district, sanitary
district, sanitation district, or water district, as
defined in statute.
3.Specifies that, for the purpose of financing the
installation of distributed generation renewable energy
sources or energy efficiency improvements, "public
agency" means a county, city, city and county, or a
municipal utility district, an irrigation district, or
public utility district that owns and operates an
electric distribution system.
4.Specifies that, for the purpose of financing other
AB 474
Page
4
public improvements, "public agency" means a city as
defined by the Improvement Act of 1911.
5.Requires the resolution of intention to authorize
contractual benefit assessments to include a brief
description of criteria for determining the
creditworthiness of a property owner.
6.Requires a legislative body to provide written notice,
at least 60 days before adopting a resolution making
contractual benefit assessment financing available to
property owners, to any entity that provides energy or
water within the boundaries of the area within which
contractual assessments may be entered into. The bill
also expresses the intent of the Legislature that a
public agency in the process of establishing an
assessment program should use a good faith effort to
provide advance notice of the proposed program to water
and electric service providers in the relevant service
area to allow the most efficient coordination and
collaboration between the public agency and water and
electric service providers.
7. Requires a legislative body levying a contractual
assessment on real property must cause to be recorded,
in the office of the county recorder for the county in
which the real property is located, concurrently with
the instrument creating the voluntary contractual
assessment, a separate document that meets all f the
following requirements:
A. The title of the document must be "Payment of
Contractual Assessment Required: in at least 14
-pint boldface type.
B. The document must contain all of the following
information:
(1) The names of all current owners of the
real property subject to the contractual
assessment, and the legal description and the
assessor's parcel number for the affected
real property.
AB 474
Page
5
(2) The amount of the contractual
assessment.
(3) The date or circumstances under which
the contractual assessment expires, or a
statement that the assessment is perpetual.
(4) The purpose for which the funds from
the contractual assessment will be used.
(5) The entity to which funds from the
contractual assessment will be paid and
specific contact information for that entity.
(6) The signature of the authorized
representative of the legislative body to
which funds form the contractual assessment
will be paid.
C. Specifies that the county recorder shall be
responsible only for examining the document and
determining that it contains specified information
and prohibit the recorder from examining any other
information contained in the document.
D. Requires the recorder to index the document under
specified names and entities contained in the
document.
8.Authorizes a seller of real property to satisfy
disclosure notice requirements for contractual
assessments by delivering a disclosure notice that is
substantially equivalent to the one specified in statue.
9.Prescribes the form and content of the Notice of
Voluntary Contractual Assessment and provides that
sellers can use the Notice to satisfy statutory notice
requirements. The local agency may charge a fee of up
to $15 for the service of furnishing a Notice of
Voluntary Contractual Assessment.
10.Identifies statutory provisions that apply to the levy
and collection of voluntary contractual assessments,
including provisions related to lien priority.
AB 474
Page
6
11.Specifies the form of the notice of the existence and
amount of each voluntary contractual assessment that a
clerk must record with the county recorder of the county
in which a lot or parcel subject to a voluntary
contractual assessment is located.
12.Contains a legislative finding and declaration that
voluntary contractual assessments are not subject to the
provisions of Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California
Constitution or specified implementing statutes.
13.Replaces the term "contractual assessment" with the term
"voluntary contractual assessment" in numerous statutes.
Comments
Building on the precedent set by last year's Levine bill,
local governments want to offer benefit assessment
financing programs to promote water efficiency. Up-front
installation costs can deter property owners from making
water efficiency improvements. Using contractual benefit
assessments, local agencies can help finance these
investments at low interest rates. Property owners who
voluntarily enter into a contractual assessment agreement
for water efficiency improvements will realize immediate
savings on their water bills while paying off their costs
over time on their property tax bills. By reducing water
consumption, the voluntary contractual benefit assessment
programs authorized by this bill will benefit residents
throughout California.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 9/8/09)
California Municipal Utilities Association (co-source)
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(co-source)
Association of California Water Agencies
Bell Gardens Chamber of Commerce
Burbank Water and Power
California Association of Realtors
AB 474
Page
7
California Association of Sanitation Agencies
California Business Properties Association
California Chamber of Commerce
California Landscape Contractors Association
California Special Districts Association
California Water Association
Central City Association
Cerritos Regional Chamber of Commerce
City of Canyon Lake
City of Corona, Department of Water and Power
City of Redondo Beach
City of Roseville
City of San Diego
Corona Department of Water and Power
East Bay Municipal Utility District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Gateway Chambers Alliance
Green Plumbers
Inland Empire Economic Partnership
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Irvine Ranch Water District
League of California Cities
Long Beach Chamber of Commerce
Long Beach Water Department
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
Los Angeles Business Council
Orange County Business Council
Orange County Taxpayers Association
Placer County Water Agency
Planning and Conservation League
PolyTurf, Inc.
Regional Council of Rural Counties
Regional Legislative Alliance of Ventura and Santa Barbara
Counties
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership
Sierra Club
Sonoma County Water Agency
South Bay Cities Council of Governments
Southern California Water Committee
Southwest California Legislative Council
Three Valleys Municipal Water District
Tree People
Valley Industry and Commerce Association
AB 474
Page
8
Water Replenishment District of Southern California
Water Reuse Association
Western Riverside Council of Governments
World Recycling Surfacing Group
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office,
this bill addresses our serious water shortage. Across the
state we are facing: (1) record low rainfalls; (2) a
possible third consecutive year of drought; (3) reservoirs
at 50 percent of normal capacity; and (4) mandatory water
rationing and restrictions in some communities. This bill
is one approach that can be taken to incentivize more
people to conserve water in their homes and businesses. It
is a very simple concept. It authorizes public agencies
and water districts to provide upfront financing for the
installation of water use efficiency improvements, such as
cisterns, purple pipes for recycled water, or drip
irrigation. A property owner would agree to be assessed
over time to pay back the loan, and in the meantime reap
the savings on their water bill. This bill expands on a
bill enacted last year that established a similar program
for financing energy improvements, and builds on that
existing framework to include water conservation. It is a
voluntary approach on all fronts, voluntary for the public
agencies to offer the financing; voluntary for property
owners to participate. It is supported by numerous
Chambers of Commerce and business interests, and many water
agencies and environmental organizations.
ASSEMBLY FLOOR :
AYES: Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Tom
Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Brownley, Buchanan,
Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway,
Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Emmerson, Eng,
Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani,
Galgiani, Gilmore, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber,
Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma,
Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Nestande, John A. Perez, V.
Manuel Perez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Skinner,
Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson,
Torres, Torrico, Tran, Yamada, Bass
NOES: Adams, Anderson, Blakeslee, DeVore, Hagman, Harkey,
Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller, Niello, Nielsen, Silva,
AB 474
Page
9
Villines
NO VOTE RECORDED: Duvall, Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Saldana
AGB:do 9/8/09 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****