BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 488|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 488
          Author:   Torres (D) and Hagman (D), et al
          Amended:  7/14/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 6/9/09
          AYES:  Liu, Maldonado, Alquist, Runner, Yee

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  13-0, 7/23/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza,  
            Price, Runner, Walters, Wolk, Wyland, Yee

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  72-0, 5/14/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Childrens services programs:  performance  
          agreement
                      contracts

           SOURCE  :     Boys Republic


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes the Department of Social  
          Services (DSS) to renew or extend beyond a three-year time  
          period specified performance agreements with private,  
          nonprofit agencies that provide child welfare services.   
          This bill requires the county or private nonprofit agency  
          to fund an independent evaluation of the agency's  
          performance, with a report of the results due to the  
          department six months prior to the end of the agreement  
          period, as specified.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 488
                                                                Page  
          2

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law:

           1.   Establishes a system of child welfare services,  
               including foster care, for children who have been or  
               are at risk of being abused or neglected.

           2.   Establishes foster care placement options for  
               dependents and wards placed in foster care, including  
               foster homes, relative and non-relative extended  
               family members' homes, Foster Family Agency-supervised  
               homes, and group homes.

           3.   Sets rates of financial assistance for varying  
               caregivers and providers.

           4.   Requires documentation that placement is necessary to  
               meet treatment needs of child as condition of  
               eligibility for placement in group home.

           5.   Allows counties to enter into performance agreements  
               with private, nonprofit agencies to encourage  
               innovation, develop services for children that are not  
               available in the community and promote change in the  
               child welfare system. 

           6.   Limits these agreements to a period of up to three  
               years.

           7.   Requires counties to provide reports on the  
               agreements to DSS within three months of the end of an  
               agreement.

           8.   Requires the director of DSS to make those reports  
               available to the Legislature upon request.

           9.   Authorizes the director of DSS to waive regulations,  
               except those pertaining to health and safety, which  
               govern foster care payments or the operation of group  
               homes to enable counties to implement the agreements.

           10.  Allows waivers under specified circumstances, when  
               the agreement offers a worthwhile test of innovation,  
               the regulatory requirement prevents implementation of  
               the agreement and the county proposes to monitor the  







                                                                AB 488
                                                                Page  
          3

               waiver regulation via performance measures.

           11.  Requires the director of DSS to notify policy and  
               fiscal committees of the Legislature of when and why a  
               waiver of regulations was granted.

          This bill allows DSS to extend, for up to three additional  
          years, performance agreements with private, nonprofit  
          agencies.

          DSS currently has the authority to approve waivers of the  
          regulations and point values in the RCL system for the  
          specified private, nonprofit agencies with which counties  
          can enter into performance agreements. One such waiver was  
          approved in 2007, for the Boys Republic facility, which  
          contracts with 8 counties to house and serve approximately  
          300 adolescent boys. All youth in the Boys Republic main  
          campus program have been placed by a county Probation  
          Department, after adjudication in Juvenile Court for a  
          delinquency offense under Section 602 of the Welfare and  
          Institutions Code.  These youth have committed crimes  
          which, if they were adults, would have been considered  
          felonies, and they are wards of the court (rather than  
          standard foster care dependents of the court).  Boys  
          Republic employs a staffing model that focuses more on  
          experience and training of staff, rather than its formal  
          post-graduate education and staffing ratios. The existing  
          RCL formula is heavily weighted to value the latter two  
          considerations above the former. Boys Republic received a  
          waiver of regulations and points, which allows it to be  
          reimbursed at RCL Level 10. Without the waiver (and, thus,  
          using the existing RCL rubric), Boys Republic would have  
          been reimbursed at RCL Level 5. It is unclear whether Boys  
          Republic, an established nonprofit in operation for over  
          100 years, would have been able to provide its services  
          without the waiver. The waiver allows the facility to be  
          reimbursed at RCL Level 10, which is more than $2,000 more  
          per month, per ward than RCL Level 5.  While the waiver  
          actually allows the facility to be reimbursed at a higher  
          RCL than it would have otherwise qualified for, it likely  
          saves the state and counties money because it is less  
          expensive than alternative placements. While the Boys  
          Republic program, when scored against the RCL rubric, met  
          the standard of an RCL Level 5, it serves a population  







                                                                AB 488
                                                                Page  
          4

          that, in the absence of Boys Republic, would have to be  
          placed in comparable or higher RCL facilities. Every ward  
          placed under Section 602 would be served in a facility of  
          RCL Level 10 or above, and most would have to be placed in  
          RCL Level 12 or above. Serving these youth at Boys Republic  
          is comparable to other placements for all wards, and for  
          most is saves more than $800 per month per ward.  If the  
          waiver is not able to be extended, and Boys Republic did  
          not continue to serve these wards, the alternatives would  
          be more costly, and the state and county would incur  
          additional costs to find the other appropriate placements.  
          The discussion of this bill focuses primarily on Boys  
          Republic because it is the only facility that has been  
          granted the specified waiver that this bill extends.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/9/09 per Senate Human Services  
          Committee)

          Boys Republic (source)  
          City of Chino Hills
          Commonweal
          County of Los Angeles Probation Department
          Youth Law Center

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  6/9/09 per Senate Human Services  
          Committee)

          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Boys Republic states that this  
          bill is a "short-term but necessary solution to a  
          longer-term problem," to allow more time for the adjustment  
          of rate structures under current law.  The organization  
          states that this bill will allow Boys Republic to continue  
          to provide its program and potentially higher-costing  
          placements will be avoided.  Los Angeles County's Probation  
          Department states that it is "extremely pleased with the  
          results of the performance agreement to date" and views  
          Boys Republic as "a valued and successful placement  
          resource."







                                                                AB 488
                                                                Page  
          5


           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    In opposition, the American  
          Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees states  
          that "under the thin veil of innovation, this bill seeks to  
          allow private companies to provide children's services to  
          counties under less regulation than otherwise allowed.   
          Reducing these regulations will directly affect the quality  
          of care given to this vulnerable population."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill Berryhill,  
            Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Brownley,  
            Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Duvall,  
            Emmerson, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuller, Furutani,  
            Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey,  
            Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries,  
            Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal,  
            Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello,  
            Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino,  
            Price, Ruskin, Salas, Silva, Skinner, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines,  
            Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ammiano, Conway, Eng, Fuentes, Gaines,  
            Saldana, Smyth, Swanson


          DLW:CTW:nl  8/19/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****