BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   January 12, 2010

                   ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON AGING AND LONG-TERM CARE
                               Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair
                   AB 535 (Ammiano) - As Amended:  January 4, 2010
                       As Proposed to be Amended: RN 10 00487
           
          SUBJECT  :   Elder death review teams (EDRTs): information  
          requests.

           SUMMARY  :   Requires skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to report  
          additional information to the Office of Statewide Health  
          Planning and Development (OSHPD).  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Allows the EDRT chair, co-chair, or an agent of the chair or  
            co-chair to participate in the electronic death registration  
            system and specifies that access to the system shall be  
            exclusively for the purpose of obtaining the following  
            information:
             a)   Place of death;
             b)   Name;
             c)   Date of death; and,
             d)   Cause of death.

          2)Requires all SNFs, except for facilities that are a distinct  
            part of a general acute care hospital, to include in the  
            annual report to OSHPD data on persons who have died in the  
            facility, including, but not limited to, the date and time of  
            death, age, and gender.

          3)Requires OSHPD to comply and make available the data by county  
            and by facility upon the request of an EDRT.

          4)Permits OSHPD to include census and utilization information  
            relating to the facilities, including whether the facility  
            offered a hospice program or another specialized program, such  
            as those for Alzheimer's disease.

          5)Adds electronic data from certificates of death from the local  
            registrar of births and deaths to the list of information that  
            may be disclosed to an EDRT, subject to any fee requirements.

           EXISTING LAW  in various statutes, regulations, and programs  
          within state departments, provides for the prevention,  
          reporting, investigation, and prosecution of elder and dependent  
          adult abuse and the collection of data regarding these cases.   
          Specifically, existing law:






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  2


          1)Requires the Department of Public Health (DPH) to license  
            SNFs, conduct annual unannounced inspections, and to  
            investigate complaints about care provided in facilities.  

          2)Requires, by regulation, that every death from unnatural  
            causes and any unusual occurrence which threatens the welfare,  
            health, or safety of residents to be reported to DPH within 24  
            hours.  Regulations also require that all resident deaths be  
            reported by the SNF to DPH when requested.

          3)Establishes OSHPD to provide the state with an enhanced  
            understanding of the structure and function of its healthcare  
            delivery systems, including the collection of data and  
            dissemination of information about California's SNFs, acute  
            care hospitals, clinics, home health care, hospice, and other  
            healthcare infrastructure.

          4)Requires all SNFs to report to OSHPD on an annual basis, a  
            current inventory of beds and services, utilization data by  
            bed type and service which includes discharge data, as well as  
            fiscal and physical plant information.

          5)Requires all SNFs to report all incidents of alleged or  
            suspected abuse to DPH within 24 hours.

          6)Requires physicians, physician assistants, and funeral  
            directors to report suspicious deaths to the coroner and  
            authorizes the coroner to investigate the death.

          7)Requires the medical and health section of the physician's or  
            coroner's certification to be completed by the attending  
            physician within 15 hours of death or by the coroner within  
            three days of examination.

          8)Requires the physician to deposit the certificate at the place  
            of death or to the attending funeral director within 15 hours  
            after the death.

          9)Imposes specific requirements for collecting information  
            regarding death certificates and requires each death to be  
            registered with the local registrar of births and deaths in  
            the district which the death was officially pronounced or the  
            body was found within eight calendar days after death and  
            prior to any disposition of the human remains.

          10)Establishes the Internet-based electronic death registration  






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  3

            system within DPH, limited to proper use of the death  
            information created, stored, and transferred within the system  
            and subject to any limitations placed on the accessibility and  
            release of personally identifying information contained in  
            those death records.

          11)Allows counties to establish an EDRT to assist local agencies  
            in identifying and reviewing suspicious elder deaths and  
            facilitation communication among persons involved in  
            investigating elder abuse cases.

          12)Specifies that EDRTs may be comprised of, but not limited to  
            the following;
             a)   Experts in the field of forensic pathology;
             b)   Medical personnel with expertise in elder abuse and  
               neglect;
             c)   Coroners and medical examiners;
             d)   District attorneys and city attorneys;
             e)   County or local staff including, but not limited to:
               i)     Adult Protective Services (APS) staff;
               ii)    Public administrator, guardian, and conservator  
                 staff;
               iii)   County health department staff who deal with elder  
                 health issues;
               iv)    County counsel;
               v)     County and state law enforcement personnel;
               vi)    Local long-term care ombudsman;
               vii)   Community care licensing staff and investigators;
               viii)  Geriatric mental health experts;
               ix)    Criminologists;
               x)     Representatives of local agencies that are involved  
                 with the oversight of APS and reporting elder abuse and  
                 neglect; and,
               xi)    Local professional associations.

          13)Allows disclosure of the following to an EDRT:

             a)   Medical information, as specified;
             b)   Mental health information, as specified;
             c)   Information from elder abuse reports and investigations,  
               except the identity of the persons who made the reports;
             d)   State summary criminal history information, criminal  
               offender record information, and local summary criminal  
               history information, as specified;
             e)   Information pertaining to reports by health  
               practitioners of persons suffering from physical injuries  
               inflicted by means of a firearm or of persons suffering  






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  4

               physical injury where the injury is a result of assaultive  
               or abusive conduct;
             f)   Information provided to probation officers in the course  
               of the performance of their duties, as specified;
             g)   Records relating to in-home supportive services, unless  
               disclosure is prohibited by federal law;
             h)   Information normally covered by the attorney-client  
               privilege, physician-patient privilege, or psychotherapist  
               privilege; and,
             a)   Information in the possession of each organization  
               represented to other members of the team concerning the  
               decedent who is the subject of the review or any person who  
               was in contact with the decedent and any other information  
               deemed by the organization to be pertinent to the review.

          14)Requires information gathered by the EDRT and any  
            recommendation made by the EDRT to be used by the county to  
            develop education, prevention, and if necessary, prosecution  
            strategies that will lead to improved coordination of services  
            for families and the elder population.

          15)Allows disclosure of written and oral communication to  
            members of the EDRT regardless of whether such information is  
            considered privileged under existing law, and prohibits  
            disclosure to a third person.

          16)Includes findings and declarations that crimes against elders  
            and dependent adults are deserving of special consideration  
            and protection and establishes the Elder Abuse and Dependent  
            Adult Civil Protection Act (EADACPA), which defines abuse of  
            an elder or dependent adult as either:
             a)   Physical abuse, neglect, financial abuse, abandonment,  
               isolation, abduction, or other treatment with resulting  
               physical harm or pain or mental suffering; or,
             b)   The deprivation by a care custodian of goods or services  
               that are necessary to avoid physical harm or mental  
               suffering.

          17)Specifies that financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult  
            under EADACPA occurs when a person or entity does any of the  
            following:
             a)   Takes, secretes, appropriates, or retains real or  
               personal property of an elder or dependent adult to a  
               wrongful use or with intent to defraud, or both; and,
             b)   Assists in taking, secreting, appropriating, or  
               retaining real or personal property of an elder or  
               dependent adult to a wrongful use or with intent to  






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  5

               defraud, or both.

          18)Specifies that any person who knows or reasonably should know  
            that a person is an elder or dependent adult and who, under  
            conditions likely to produce great bodily harm or death,  
            willfully causes or permits any elder or dependent adult to  
            suffer, or inflicts unjustifiable physical pain or mental  
            suffering, or having the care or custody of any elder or  
            dependent adult to be placed in a situation in which his or  
            her person or health is endangered to be punished by:
             a)   a term of imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed  
               one year;
             b)   a fine not to exceed six thousand dollars ($6,000);
             c)   both a fine and imprisonment in a county jail; or,
             d)   imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four  
               years.

          19)Establishes the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program which is  
            authorized through the federal Older Americans Act and its  
            state companion, the Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act.   
            The primary responsibility of the program is to investigate  
            and attempt to resolve complaints made by, or on behalf of,  
            individual residents in long-term care facilities.  These  
            facilities include skilled nursing facilities, residential  
            care facilities for the elderly, intermediate care facilities,  
            adult residential care facilities, and adult day health care  
            facilities. 

          20)Establishes the APS program which provides for the prevention  
            and reporting of abuse and neglect of elders and dependent  
            adults and the delivery of various services to victims of  
            abuse as well as those who are functionally impaired.  APS  
            provides assistance to elderly and dependent adults who are  
            functionally impaired, unable to meet their own needs, or are  
            victims of abuse, neglect, or exploitation.  The county APS  
            program receives reports of abuse and neglect of elderly and  
            dependent adults residing in their own homes for investigation  
            and evaluation of their need for protection and services. APS  
            coordinates support services for both emergency situations and  
            longer-term case management.

          21)Requires any mandated reporter who, within the scope of his  
            or her employment, observes, has knowledge of physical abuse,  
            financial abuse or neglect, or is told by an elder or  
            dependent adult that he or she has experienced abuse, or  
            reasonably suspects abuse, to immediately report the known or  
            suspected abuse.






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  6


          22)Defines a mandated reporter as any of the following:
             a)   Any person who has assumed full or intermittent  
               responsibility for care or custody of an elder or dependent  
               adult, including administrators, supervisors, and any  
               licensed staff of a public or private facility that  
               provides care or services for elder or dependent adults, or  
               any elder or dependent adult care custodian;
             b)   Health practitioners;
             c)   Clergy members;
             d)   Employees of a county APS agency; and,
             e)   Employees of a local law enforcement agency.

          23)Requires the local ombudsperson and the local law enforcement  
            agency to do all of the following:
             a)   Report to the State Department of Public Health any case  
               of known or suspected abuse occurring in a long-term health  
               care facility.
             b)   Report to the State Department of Social Services any  
               case of known or suspected abuse occurring in a residential  
               care facility for the elderly, or in an adult day care  
               facility.
             c)   Report to the State Department of Health Services and  
               the California Department of Aging any case of known or  
               suspected abuse occurring in an adult day health care  
               center.
             d)   Report to the Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse  
               any case of known or suspected criminal activity.

          24)Provides penalties for failure to report elder abuse under  
            the mandated reporting requirements including fines and  
            imprisonment.

          25)Provides mandated reporters with immunity from civil or  
            criminal liability as a result of any report of known or  
            suspected abuse of an elder or dependent adult unless it can  
            be proven that a false report was made and the person knew  
            that the report was false.

          26)Provides for cross-reporting guidelines for APS, local  
            long-term care ombudsmen, and local law enforcement agencies.

          27)Allows, but does not require, any person who is not a  
            mandated reporter who knows, or reasonably suspects, that an  
            elder or dependent adult has been the victim of abuse to  
            report that abuse to a local long-term care ombudsman program  
            or local law enforcement when the abuse is alleged to have  






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  7

            occurred in a long-term care facility, and to the county APS  
            agency or local law enforcement when the suspected abuse  
            occurred in any other place.

          In addition, state law authorizes the Department of Justice's  
          Bureau of Medi-Cal Fraud and Elder Abuse to protect the state's  
          Medi-Cal Program from fraud and abuse, and to investigate and  
          prosecute elder and dependent adult abuse, neglect, and poor  
          quality of care occurring in long-term care facilities.  

          Local law enforcement entities are responsible for investigating  
          reported elder and dependent adult abuse cases.  Some local law  
          enforcement agencies dedicate specific units to these cases.

          District attorney and city attorney offices are responsible for  
          the investigation and prosecution of elder and dependent adult  
          abuse.  Some local entities have devoted units to specialize in  
          the prosecution of elder and dependent adult abuse cases.

          The Department of Corporations operates a statewide outreach  
          campaign called Seniors Against Investment Fraud to alert and  
          educate Californians over the age of 50 regarding investment and  
          telemarketing fraud and how to avoid being victimized.  

          Finally, local Financial Abuse Specialist Teams (FASTs) review  
          financial abuse cases and assist in resolving complex cases.   
          FAST teams consist of representatives from law enforcement, APS,  
          the district attorney's office, and county counsel's office.  In  
          addition, the public guardian has been vested with greater  
          powers to promptly intervene where law enforcement has a  
          reasonable suspicion that an elderly person could be, or is, a  
          victim of financial abuse.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   None

           COMMENTS  :   
          According to the author, this bill provides an essential tool  
          for EDRTs to annually track the deaths of elders in each county.  
           For example, patterns that may develop locally with respect to  
          deaths will be more easily tracked and responded to with this  
          information.



           Elder Death Review Teams:
           California has 33 EDRTs operating, although their size and  
          practices vary.  The overarching purpose of all EDRTs is to  






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  8

          assist local agencies in identifying and reviewing suspicious  
          elder deaths and facilitating communication among persons who  
          perform autopsies and the various agencies involved in  
          investigating and prosecuting elder abuse and neglect cases.   
          According to the Sacramento EDRT, their goal is to eradicate  
          elder abuse by advocating for systemic changes that improve the  
          community's response to the needs of older victims of abuse and  
          neglect.  Its mission is to examine deaths associated with  
          suspected elder abuse and/or neglect, and identify and implement  
          prevention strategies that protect the county's elders.  There  
          is no statewide department or organization responsible for the  
          oversight and training of EDRTs.

           Existing Data Collection and Reporting Practices:
           OSHPD annually produces the State Utilization Data File of  
          Long-Term Care Facilities.  
          The data included in the report comes from the individual Annual  
          Utilization Report of Long-Term Care Facilities filed by  
          California's licensed long-term care facilities for the previous  
          calendar year.  Each facility reports its annual utilization  
          data to OSHPD through a secure web-based reporting system.  The  
          data includes general licensee information, patient census,  
          demographics, and discharge data, including discharges due to  
          death.  According to OSHPD data, California had 1,065 SNFs  
          serving 90,695 residents in 2008.  OSHPD data also indicates  
          that in 2008, discharges due to death accounted for 10.7 percent  
          of all discharges, a decline from 11.7 percent in 2007 and 16.1  
          percent in 2003.  As noted in the Assembly Health Committee  
          analysis, there is no daily, monthly, or quarterly reporting to  
          OSHPD of the deaths of residents in SNFs.  

          When a resident dies in a SNF, a physician or physician's  
          assistant completes a death certificate and the medical and  
          health section data of the certificate.  Any unusual occurrence  
          in a SNF, including unusual deaths, must be reported by the SNF  
          to DPH.  All physicians, physician assistants and funeral  
          directors are required to report suspicious deaths to the  
          coroner. In addition, all employees and volunteers at the SNF,  
          the physician, physician assistant, and any health care worker  
          with contact with older or dependent adults are mandated  
          reporters for suspected elder and dependent adult abuse under  
          existing law and required to report suspected abuse to the local  
          ombudsman or local law enforcement.  The local ombudsman is also  
          required to report suspected abuse to DPH.

           Arguments in Support:
           California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), the  






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  9

          sponsor of this bill, contend that there is no system in place  
          currently that tracks the rates or patterns of deaths in  
          facilities.  Although California has EDRTs, these teams do not  
          receive information about the deaths that occur in nursing homes  
          in any systematic manner.  There are no individuals or entities  
          mandated to report incidents of known or suspected elder abuse  
          to EDRTs and any case coming to their attention would be on a  
          voluntary basis.  CANHR argues that this bill would not create  
          an undue burden or hardship on facilities since it would simply  
          require them to report the age, gender, and date of death of the  
          resident.  

          Amendments discussed in the Assembly Health Committee and  
          reflected in this analysis have removed the prior opposition to  
          the bill.




           Prior Legislation:
           SB 333 (Escutia), Chapter 301, Statutes of 2001, authorized  
          counties to establish an interagency EDRT to assist local  
          agencies in identifying and reviewing suspicious elder deaths.   
          EDRTs were modeled after interagency child death review teams  
          and domestic violence review teams.  Pursuant to SB 333,  
          counties are authorized to us EDRTs to develop a protocol that  
          could guide coroners and other persons performing autopsies in  
          identifying elder abuse.  

          SB 1644 (Romero) of 2004 would have required a local registrar  
          of births and deaths to provide specified information from death  
          certificates, upon request, to the local EDRT.  SB 1644 was  
          vetoed by the Governor with the following message:

               I support the work of county elder death review teams that  
               are designed to assist in identifying and reviewing  
               suspicious elder deaths.  These multidisciplinary teams  
               bring together experts from many departments including law  
               enforcement, health care, adult protective services, and  
               the coroner's office.  In addition to this effort, county  
               coroners are required to examine all cases where an  
               unnatural death is suspected or where a physician has not  
               been in attendance within the past 20 days.  Current law  
               also requires the majority of health care providers to be  
               mandatory reporters of elder abuse or neglect.  There is no  
               evidence that the information currently provided to the  
               elder death review teams is inadequate to assist in  






                                                                  AB 535
                                                                  Page  10

               identifying and reviewing suspicious elder deaths.  I  
               appreciate the author's commitment to reducing elder abuse  
               and neglect and I share her concern that each suspicious  
               death be fully investigated.  However, the access to  
               electronic death certification information will not enhance  
               the deliberative process these teams employ.

          SB 397 (Escutia) of 2005 would have required SNFs and  
          residential care facilities for the chronically ill within a  
          county that has an EDRT to notify the chair of the EDRT, or  
          chair's designee, when there is a death of an elderly resident  
          of the facility.  SB 397 failed passage in the Assembly Health  
          Committee and these provisions were subsequently deleted from  
          the bill and unrelated provisions inserted.

           Suggested Amendment:
           If the author's intent is to allow EDRTs to track death data by  
          SNF and discern unusual or suspicious deaths from expected  
          deaths, the author may wish to amend the bill to require  
                                           facilities to report not just whether or not the facility had a  
          hospice program in place as currently reported to OSHPD, but  
          individual enrollment in hospice at the time of death.  

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR)

           Opposition 
           
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Allison Ruff / AGING & L.T.C. / (916)  
          319-3990