BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 538
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 22, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                   AB 538 (Arambula) - As Amended:  April 15, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Public  
          SafetyVote:  7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              Yes

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes entities that provide emergency medical  
          services to report intentional, non-emergency misuse of the 911  
          system to the public safety agency that originally received the  
          call, and upon verification that a violation has occurred, the  
          public safety entity originally receiving the call shall issue  
          the applicable warnings and citations (a warning for a first  
          offense, followed by an infraction for subsequent offenses).  
           
           FISCAL EFFECT
           
          Minor nonreimbursable local costs, offset to a degree by  
          increased fine revenue, to the extent this bill results in  
          additional reports and investigations.    

           COMMENTS
           
           1)Rationale.  According to the author, "This bill is intended to  
            address the problem of individuals who call 911 to arrange for  
            emergency medical transportation, knowing that they do not  
            have a medical emergency. 

            "Existing law addresses the problem of people who call 911 as  
            a prank, to harass, or to make conversation unrelated to any  
            emergency. However, the law is somewhat vague in dealing with  
            individuals who claim they are having an emergency primarily  
            to use the dispatched emergency transportation as a taxi  
            service." 
           
           2)Amendment  . Per recent authors' amendments, potential mandate  
            issues raised by San Bernardino County should no longer be a  








                                                                  AB 538
                                                                  Page  2

            concern. 



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081