BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 577|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 577
          Author:   Bonnie Lowenthal (D)
          Amended:  8/31/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  9-0, 6/17/09
          AYES:  Alquist, Strickland, Aanestad, Cox, DeSaulnier,  
            Leno, Maldonado, Pavley, Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cedillo, Negrete McLeod

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  73-0, 5/14/09 (Consent) - See last page  
            for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes specified state departments  
          to apply approved exemption requests of a Program of  
          All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) to all locations  
          of a PACE organization, modifies the exemption for PACE  
          that may be granted under existing law to require the  
          exemption to be from duplicative, conflicting or  
          inconsistent requirements, and prohibits specific federal  
          requirements of the PACE model from being waived.

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/31/09 deleted a provision of  
          the bill that author would authorize the Department of  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 577
                                                                Page  
          2

          Health Care Services (DHCS) to apply approved exemption  
          requests to all locations of a PACE organization, or to all  
          PACE organizations on a statewide basis.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Permits the Director of DHCS to establish PACE to  
             promote the development of community-based, risk-based  
             capitated, long-term care programs.  The Director is  
             allowed to contract with up to ten demonstration  
             projects to develop risk-based long-term care pilot  
             programs modeled upon On Lok Senior Health Services in  
             San Francisco.  PACE program benefits are Medi-Cal  
             benefits under existing law, subject to utilization  
             controls and eligibility criteria that require that the  
             beneficiary be certified as eligible for nursing  
             facility services based on Medi-Cal criteria.

          2. Permits DHCS, and as applicable, the Department of Aging  
             (DOA) and the Department of Social Services (DSS), to  
             grant to a PACE program exemptions from the provisions  
             contained in the clinic licensing law, the community  
             care facilities law, the residential care facilities for  
             the elderly law, the adult day health centers (ADHC)  
             law, the home health agencies law, and regulations  
             governing Medi-Cal and health facilities, including home  
             health agencies, clinics, and adult day health care  
             centers.  These exemptions can include the use of  
             alternate concepts, methods, procedures, techniques,  
             space, equipment, personnel, personnel qualifications,  
             or the conducting of pilot projects, provided the  
             exemptions are implemented in a manner that does not  
             jeopardize the health and welfare of participants  
             receiving services under PACE, or deprive beneficiaries  
             of rights in federal or state laws or regulations.

          3. Permits a PACE program to submit a single request for an  
             exemption from licensing requirements that is applicable  
             to two or more licenses held by that organization, so  
             long as the request lists the locations and license  
             numbers held by that organization, and the requested  
             exemption is the same and appropriate for all licensed  







                                                                AB 577
                                                                Page  
          3

             locations.  

          This bill:

          1. Modifies the exemption authority allowed under existing  
             law for PACE programs from specified state statutory and  
             regulatory requirements to require the exemption to be  
             from duplicative, conflicting or inconsistent  
             requirements.

          2. Prohibits specified federal requirements of the PACE  
             model from being waived or modified, including all of  
             the following:

             A.    The focus on frail elderly qualifying  
                individuals who require the level of care provided  
                in a nursing facility.

             B.    The delivery of comprehensive, integrated acute  
                and long-term care services.

             C.    The interdisciplinary team approach to care  
                management and service delivery.

             D.    Capitated, integrated financing that allows the  
                provider to pool payments received from public and  
                private programs and individuals.

             E.    The assumption by the provider of full  
                financial risk.

             F.    The provision of a PACE benefit package for all  
                participants, regardless of source of payment,  
                that includes all Medicare-covered items and  
                services, all Medicaid-covered items and services,  
                as specified in the state's Medicaid plan, and  
                other services determined necessary by the  
                interdisciplinary team to improve and maintain the  
                participant's overall health status. 

          3. Permits a written request that is required to be  
             submitted by a PACE organization as part of an exemption  
             request to include a description of how the applicable  
             state requirement duplicates state or federal  







                                                                AB 577
                                                                Page  
          4

             requirements related to the PACE model.  Under current  
             law, the required description must include how the  
             applicable state requirement conflicts with, or is  
             inconsistent with, state or federal requirements related  
             to the PACE model.

           Background
           
          PACE is a capitated benefit provided primarily to certain  
          Medi-Cal and Medicare beneficiaries that offers a  
          comprehensive service delivery system and integrates  
          Medicare and Medicaid financing.  The program was modeled  
          after the acute and long-term care services of On Lok  
          Senior Health Services in San Francisco. 

          Participants must be at least 55 years old, live in the  
          PACE service area, and be certified as eligible for nursing  
          home care.  Enrollment in PACE is voluntary.  An  
          interdisciplinary team, consisting of professional and  
          paraprofessional staff, assesses participants' needs,  
          develops care plans, and delivers all services (including  
          acute care services and when necessary, nursing facility  
          services).  The PACE service package must include all  
          Medicare and Medicaid covered services, and other services  
          determined necessary by the interdisciplinary team for the  
          care of the PACE participant.  PACE providers assume full  
          financial risk for participants' care without limits on  
          amount, duration, or scope of services.

          Existing state law allows up to 10 approved PACE providers.  
           There are currently five approved PACE organizations in  
          parts of eight counties in California.  The governor's  
          2009-10 budget estimates average monthly enrollment in PACE  
          statewide to be 35,043, and projects total capitation  
          payments to PACE plans of $152.8 million ($76 million GF).

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/1/09)

          Aging Services of California
          Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging








                                                                AB 577
                                                                Page  
          5

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    PACE programs write in support  
          that this bill is a technical clean-up bill in response to  
          AB 847 (Berg), Chapter 315, Statutes of 2005 that would  
          give state departments the authority to resolve regulatory  
          conflicts and decrease inefficiency in the oversight of  
          PACE by allowing exemption requests to apply statewide and  
          program-wide.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill Berryhill,  
            Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Brownley,  
            Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore,  
            Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuller, Furutani, Galgiani, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall,  
            Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman,  
            Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande,  
            Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez,  
            Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Silva, Skinner,  
            Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres,  
            Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Ammiano, Fuentes, Gaines, Garrick,  
            Saldana, Smyth, Bass


          CTW:DLW:do  9/1/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****