BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 590|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 590
          Author:   Feuer (D)
          Amended:  6/30/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  3-2, 7/14/09
          AYES:  Corbett, Florez, Leno
          NOES:  Harman, Walters

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  50-29, 6/1/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Legal aid:  pro bono

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill prohibits the use of the term legal  
          aid by an entity unless the entity is a nonprofit  
          organization that provides civil legal services to the poor  
          without charge.  This bill also prohibits any person from  
          selling or charging a fee for legal forms used in court  
          proceedings that are created by a legal aid organization or  
          state agency and available to the public for free from that  
          entity.

          The bill also states the intent of the Legislature to  
          encourage attorneys to make further efforts to meet their  
          professional responsibilities and other obligations by  
          providing pro bono legal services and financial support to  
          nonprofit legal organizations that provide free legal  
          services to underserved communities.
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 590
                                                                Page  
          2


           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law regulates immigration consultants  
          and prohibits them from literally translating, with the  
          intent to mislead, from English into another language, the  
          words or titles, including, but not limited to, "notary  
          public," "notary," "licensed," "attorney," "lawyer," or any  
          other terms that imply that the person is an attorney, in  
          any document, as specified.  (Business and Professions Code  
          Section 22442.3.)

          This bill makes it unlawful for any person or organization  
          to use the term "legal aid," "legal aide," or any  
          confusingly similar name in any firm name, trade name,  
          fictitious business name, or any other designation, or on  
          any advertisement, letterhead, business card, or sign,  
          unless the person or organization is a legal aid  
          organization subject to fair use principles for nominative,  
          descriptive, or noncommercial use.

          This bill provides that it is unlawful for any person to  
          sell or charge a fee for legal forms or other documents  
          created by a legal aid organization, court, or state agency  
          for use in a court action or proceeding if the form or  
          document is available to the public for free from the  
          entity.

          This bill provides that it is unlawful for any person to  
          assist or offer to assist in the provision of self-help  
          services for a fee if those services are provided without  
          charge by a court or legal aid organization.

          This bill defines "legal aid organization" to mean a  
          nonprofit organization that provides civil legal services  
          for the poor without charge.

          This bill provides that any consumer injured by a violation  
          of its provisions may file a complaint and seek injunctive  
          relief, restitution, and damages in the superior court of  
          any county in which the defendant maintains an office,  
          advertises, or is listed in a telephone directory.

          This bill provides that any person who violates its  
          provisions relating to legal aid organizations would be  
          subject to an injunction against further violations by a  







                                                                AB 590
                                                                Page  
          3

          legal aid organization with an office in any county in  
          which the defendant maintains an office, advertises, or is  
          listed in the telephone directory.  This bill provides  
          that, in such an action, it would not be necessary to  
          allege or prove actual damage to the plaintiff.   
          Irreparable harm and interim harm to the plaintiff would be  
          presumed.

          This bill provides that reasonable attorney's fees be  
          awarded to a prevailing plaintiff in any action brought  
          under the bill's provisions.

          Existing law provides that it has been the tradition of  
          those learned in the law and licensed to practice law in  
          this state to provide voluntary pro bono legal services to  
          those who cannot afford the help of a lawyer; that every  
          lawyer authorized and privileged to practice law in  
          California is expected to make a contribution; that in some  
          circumstances, it may not be feasible for a lawyer to  
          directly provide pro bono services; and that in those  
          circumstances, a lawyer may instead fulfill his or her  
          individual pro bono ethical commitment, in part, by  
          providing financial support to organizations providing free  
          legal services to persons of limited means.  (Business and  
          Professions Code Section 6073.)

          Existing law provides that a contract with the state for  
          legal services that exceeds $50,000 shall include a  
          certification by the contracting law firm that the firm  
          agrees to make a good faith effort to provide, during the  
          duration of the contract, a minimum number of hours of pro  
          bono legal services during each year of the contract and  
          that failure to make a good faith effort may be cause for  
          nonrenewal of a state contract for legal services, and may  
          be taken into account when determining the award of future  
          contracts with the state for legal services.  Existing law  
          also provides that in awarding a contract with the state  
          for legal aid services that exceeds $50,000, the awarding  
          department shall consider the efforts of a potential  
          contracting law firm to provide, during the 12-month period  
          prior to award of the contract, the minimum number of hours  
          of pro bono legal services.  (Business and Professions Code  
          Section 6072.)








                                                                AB 590
                                                                Page  
          4

          This bill states that is the intent of the Legislature to  
          encourage the legal profession to make further efforts to  
          meet its professional responsibilities and other  
          obligations by providing pro bono legal services and  
          financial support of nonprofit legal organizations that  
          provide free legal services to underserved communities.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  7/16/09)

          AIDS Legal Referral panel
          Bet Tzedek Legal Services
          California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform
          California Alliance for Retired Americans
          California Commission on Access to Justice
          California Indian Legal Services
          California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation
          Center for California Homeowner Association Law
          Central California Legal Services, Inc.
          City of Santa Monica
          Congress of California Seniors
          Consumer Attorneys of California
          Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund
          Inner city Law Center
          Legal Aid Association of California
          Legal Aid Society of San Diego
          Legal Services of Northern California
          Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
          Los Angeles Center for Law and Justice
          Neighborhood Legal Service of Los Angeles County
          Public Advocates 
          Public Counsel
          Public Interest Clearinghouse
          State Bar of California
          Watsonville Law Center
          Western Center on Law and Poverty

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office explains that  
          this bill is intended to carry our recommendations of the  
          California Commission on Access to Justice and also notes  
          that a "November 2005 information hearing jointly sponsored  
          by the Assembly Judiciary Committee and the Judicial  







                                                                AB 590
                                                                Page  
          5

          Council touched on the issues of legal aid fraud and the  
          need for additional pro bono contributions to meet the  
          large and growing 'justice gap'."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans,  
            Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Hall, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, John A. Perez, V.  
            Manuel Perez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana,  
            Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico,  
            Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee,  
            Conway, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Fletcher, Fuller,  
            Gaines, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey, Huber,  
            Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller, Nestande, Niello,  
            Nielsen, Silva, Smyth, Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Block


          RJG:cm  7/16/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****