BILL ANALYSIS
AB 599
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 6, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 599 (Hall) - As Introduced: February 25, 2009
Policy Committee: Health Vote:17-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill exempts laboratories (labs) accredited by the American
Society of Crime Lab Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board
(ASCLD/LAB) or another accrediting body approved by the
California Department of Public Health (DPH) Forensic Alcohol
Review Committee from direct regulation by DPH.
FISCAL EFFECT
No direct fiscal impact to DPH to continue oversight of testing
labs in California.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . This bill exempts specified private labs accredited
by ASCLD from current law regulation by DPH with respect to
testing samples for blood alcohol levels. SB 1623 (Johnson),
Chapter 337, Statutes of 2004, eliminated the specific
licensing authority of DPH and left regulations in place to
govern oversight. This bill shifts ASCLD labs from DPH
regulatory oversight to reduce duplicative regulatory
processes.
2)Background . There are 38 forensic alcohol laboratories in
California that conduct blood alcohol analysis and other
forensic tests. City, county, and state law enforcement
agencies operate 28 of these forensic alcohol laboratories,
and the remaining 10 labs are privately owned. Some of these
private laboratories provide testing services for law
enforcement through contractual arrangements with cities and
counties. Combined, all labs statewide conduct approximately
200,000 alcohol tests, including breath alcohol tests for law
enforcement. Current law requires each forensic alcohol
laboratory to have a valid license issued in accordance with
regulations and establishes qualifications for licensing,
AB 599
Page 2
including staff and personnel functions, maintenance of a
quality control program, satisfactory performance in
proficiency tests, and an on-site DPH inspection. This bill
removes this oversight for private labs with national
accreditation.
3)Concerns . The California Attorneys for Criminal Justice (CACJ)
and the California DUI Lawyers Association (CDLA) oppose this
bill. Opponents indicate this bill precludes public
participation and oversight of critical regulations,
negatively impacts Department of Motor Vehicle hearings
related to driver's license suspensions, and disrupts
standardized approaches to DUI cases.
Analysis Prepared by : Mary Ader / APPR. / (916) 319-2081