BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 599|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 599
          Author:   Hall (D)
          Amended:  7/13/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE HEALTH COMMITTEE  :  10-0, 7/8/09
          AYES:  Alquist, Strickland, Aanestad, Cedillo, Cox,  
            DeSaulnier, Leno, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8
           
          ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  76-0, 5/18/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Forensic blood alcohol testing laboratories

           SOURCE  :     California Association of Crime Laboratory  
          Directors


          DIGEST  :    This bill provides that, until the effective  
          date of specified regulatory changes, accreditation on the  
          forensic alcohol analysis discipline or subdiscipline by  
          the American Society of Crime Laboratory  
          Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board is sufficient to  
          comply with proficiency testing requirements.  This bill  
          also requires the review committee established by the  
          Department of Public Health to submit its summary of  
          revisions of the regulations to the Health and Human  
          Services Agency by December 31, 2010.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 599
                                                                Page  
          2

          ANALYSIS  :    

           Existing Law

           1. Requires laboratories that perform forensic alcohol  
             analysis tests by or for law enforcement agencies on  
             blood, urine, tissue, or breath samples to comply with  
             regulations pertaining to competence, staffing, and  
             laboratory procedures, as specified, but provides that  
             such laboratories shall not be licensed by the  
             Department of Public Health (DPH).

          2. Requires DPH to establish a forensic alcohol review  
             committee consisting of law enforcement officials,  
             defense attorneys, coroners and other members, as  
             specified, to evaluate and recommend revisions to  
             regulations that the committee determines are necessary  
             to ensure the competence of laboratories and employees  
             to prepare, analyze, and report the results of tests.

          3. Requires all laboratories that perform forensic alcohol  
             analysis tests by or for law enforcement agencies to  
             follow guidelines for proficiency testing established by  
             the American Society of Crime Laboratory  
             Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB).

          4. Requires DPH to establish a review committee to review  
             the regulations and determine revisions that will limit  
             those regulations to those that the review committee  
             determines are reasonably necessary to ensure the  
             competence of the laboratories and employees to prepare,  
             analyze, and report the results of the tests and comply  
             with applicable laws and to submit a summary of  
             revisions to the Health and Human Services Agency  
             (HHSA).

           Existing State Regulations
           
          1. Establish qualifications for forensic alcohol  
             supervisors, forensic alcohol analysts, or forensic  
             alcohol analyst trainees.

          2. Require forensic laboratories to:








                                                                AB 599
                                                                Page  
          3

             A.    Meet established laboratory performance and  
                procedure standards.

             B.    Employ at least one forensic alcohol supervisor.

             C.    Maintain a quality control program in forensic  
                alcohol analysis procedures.

             D.    Demonstrate satisfactory performance in a  
                proficiency testing program conducted by, or approved  
                by, DPH, to evaluate the accuracy of the forensic  
                alcohol analyses performed by the laboratory.

             E.    Maintain records pertaining to personnel, analysis  
                results, equipment, proficiency testing.

             F.    Pass on-site inspections by the DPH.

           Background

           According to DPH, 38 forensic alcohol laboratories in  
          California conduct alcohol analysis and other forensic  
          tests.  City, county, and state governmental law  
          enforcement agencies operate 28 of these forensic alcohol  
          laboratories, and 10 are private laboratories.  Some of the  
          private laboratories provide testing services for law  
          enforcement through contractual arrangements with cities  
          and counties.  Twenty-six of the forensic alcohol  
          laboratories (all governmental) are accredited by  
          ASCLD/LAB.  The 38 forensic alcohol laboratories annually  
          conduct approximately 200,000 alcohol tests.

          DPH's regulations are designed to ensure the competency of  
          local forensic alcohol laboratories, the qualifications of  
          the employees of the laboratories, and the accuracy of  
          breath alcohol testing procedures used by law enforcement  
          agencies, which affects the admissibility of tests into  
          evidence in drunk driving cases.

          SB 1623 (Johnson), Chapter 337, Statutes of 2004, removed  
          DPH's authority to license the laboratories.  Prior to  
          this, DPH operated a forensic alcohol laboratory licensing  
          and regulatory program for more than 30 years.  Current  
          statute still requires forensic alcohol labs to comply with  







                                                                AB 599
                                                                Page  
          4

          all of DPH's regulations, and requires DPH to enforce the  
          regulations.

          AB 1623 also established a review committee to evaluate  
          DPH's regulations pertaining to forensic alcohol testing in  
          order to determine revisions that the review committee  
          determines are reasonably necessary.  Under current  
          statute, the HHSA can disapprove revisions proposed by the  
          review committee, but neither it or DPH can promulgate  
          regulations on its own.

          DPH states that the review committee is composed of  
          representatives of groups involved in, or affected by,  
          DPH's regulations (including the sponsor of this bill, the  
          California Association of Crime Lab Directors).  The  
          committee has met nine times, but has not completed its  
          determinations.

          DPH also states that, with the passage of SB 1623, it has  
          ceased routine onsite inspections of forensic alcohol labs,  
          but it maintains authority to conduct inspections for  
          cause, and is still required to regulate forensic alcohol  
          laboratories.  DPH annually requires two proficiency tests  
          of each forensic alcohol laboratory, and laboratories are  
          required to participate in an additional ASCLD/LAB-approved  
          proficiency test and provide these results to DPH.

          According to DPH, the conviction and removal of drunk  
          drivers from California's streets and highways provides  
          important public health and safety benefits.  In 2005,  
          1,719 California residents were killed in alcohol-related  
          crashes and thousands more were injured.  Chemical testing  
          to determine the concentration of alcohol inn the blood of  
          persons involved in traffic violations is a critical  
          component of the state's efforts to control drunk driving.  
           
           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/19/09)

          California Association of Crime Laboratory Directors  
          (source)
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  







                                                                AB 599
                                                                Page  
          5

          Employees, AFL-CIO
          California Peace Officers' Association
          California State Sheriff's Association
          District Attorney of Santa Clara County
          Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
          Sheriff-Coroner, San Bernardino County
          San Diego County Sheriff's Department
          San Francisco Police Department
          Orange County Sheriff's Department
          Ventura County Sheriff's Department

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/19/09)

          Department of Public Health
          California Association for Medical Laboratory Technology


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon,  
            DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu,  
            Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Nava,  
            Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Silva, Skinner, Smyth,  
            Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres,  
            Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Eng, Monning, Price, Saldana


          CTW:cm  8/19/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****