BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 613
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 20, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                     AB 613 (Beall) - As Amended:  May 5, 2009  

          Policy Committee:                              Health Vote:18-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS)  
          to to improve and streamline the treatment authorization request  
          (TAR) process in Medi-Cal. TARs are the route by which providers  
          receive prior authorization for specified treatments and  
          services provided on behalf of Medi-Cal patients. Specifically,  
          this bill: 

          1)Shortens several current law TAR processing times:
             a)   From  five working days  to  two working days  when not  
               contraindicated.
             b)   From  five working days  to  two working days  when not  
               subject to objective medical criteria. 
             c)   From  up to 90 days  to  up to 15 days  for deferral  
               decisions on elective, non-urgent services. 
             d)   From  10 working days  to  5 working days  for deferral  
               decisions on non-urgent services. 

          2)Requires DHCS to perform a cost-benefit analysis for each  
            procedure requiring a TAR and reduce the number of TARs,  
            develop alternative approaches for fraud and abuse detection  
            through targeted analysis of utilization baselines for each  
            drug or service that identify potential anomalies. Develop an  
            alternative to the requirement that a patient obtain a TAR for  
            each individual day of his or her stay in the hospital and  
            consider adopting a single TAR for the entire length of a  
            patient's hospital stay.

           FISCAL EFFECT  
           
           1)This bill puts more than $300 million in Medi-Cal savings at  
            risk. Medi-Cal drug rebates, not addressed in this bill,  








                                                                  AB 613
                                                                  Page  2

            reflect discounts provided by manufacturers to the Medi-Cal  
            program. When manufacturers agree to provide a rebate to  
            Medi-Cal, medications are subjected to fewer TARs . The TAR  
            process is a barrier to prescription drug providers getting  
            medications to patients. Being released from TAR requirements  
            creates an incentive to provide a discount. This bill, by  
            reducing this incentive bill puts these rebate savings at  
            risk.  

           2)DHCS staffing costs of $5 million (50% GF) to $10 million (50%  
            GF) to reduce TAR timelines significantly. According to prior  
            research about the TAR process, more than 11 million TARs are  
            processed each year and the current law staffing is  
            approximately 600, accounting for both DHCS and contracted  
            staff. This bill requires expedited processing which may  
            require 50 to 100 additional staff. Costs would decrease once  
            DHCS established new TAR processes, but that may take several  
            years to occur.  

           3)One-time costs of $500,000 (50% GF) to $1 million (50% GF) to  
            DHCS to evaluate TAR processes and make recommendations  
            accordingly.  

          COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale  . This bill is sponsored by the California Hospital  
            Association to improve the TAR process for providers who find  
            the system arcane and burdensome. For example, hospitals are  
            required to submit TARs for numerous treatments and procedures  
            for in-patient hospital stays, instead of a bundled, daily  
            TAR. According to the author and sponsor, this bill builds on  
            recommendations made by the California HealthCare Foundation  
            (CHCF) in a report published in 2003. 

           2)CHCF TAR Report  . The CHCF report establishes several criteria  
            for an effective prior authorization tool, like TARs: (a) to  
            review medical necessity and quality (b) to ensure cost  
            control by providing treatment at contracted/approved rates  
            and (c) to detect fraud by monitoring providers requesting an  
            unusual quantity of services or patients receiving unusual  
            services. 

          According to CHCF, Medi-Cal's TAR process generally does not  
            meet these objectives because TARs are often submitted after  
            the service has been delivered, which places Medi-Cal patients  








                                                                  AB 613
                                                                  Page  3

            at risk if patients are receiving unnecessary procedures or  
            inappropriate care.  The report also indicates Medi-Cal fails  
            to perform routine cost-benefit analyses to identify whether a  
            particular service warrants a TAR and concludes that fraud is  
            better detected through reviewing claims before payments are  
            made..   
           

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Mary Ader / APPR. / (916) 319-2081