BILL ANALYSIS
AB 640
Page 1
Date of Hearing: May 6, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 640 (Huber) - As Amended: April 21, 2009
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill requires that any person convicted of the sale of
methamphetamine, who is granted probation, shall be confined in
a county jail for at least 120 days, as a condition of
probation, unless the court finds it is in the interest of
justice not to impose that sentence.
FISCAL EFFECT
Unknown, potentially moderate nonreimbursable local
incarceration costs, potentially in the low millions of dollars
statewide, for 120 days of mandatory minimum jail time.
(For order of magnitude purposes, about 3,000 persons were
committed to state prison for methamphetamine sales in 2007 and
2008 combined.)
COMMENTS
1)Rationale. Current law specifies that any person convicted of
the sale of cocaine or heroin, who is eligible for probation,
and is granted probation must, as a condition of probation, be
confined in a county jail for at least 180 days, except the
court may, in the interest of justice, waive the minimum term.
This bill requires that persons convicted of the sale of
methamphetamine serve at least 120 days in the county jail.
The 60-day differential maintains the distinction between
methamphetamine, as a Schedule II controlled substance, the
sale of which is punishable by 2, 3, or 4 years in state
prison, and cocaine and heroin, as Schedule I substances, the
sales of which are punishable by 3, 4, or 5 years in state
AB 640
Page 2
prison.
2)Opposition . California Attorneys for Criminal Justice oppose
the diminution of judicial discretion. "?it is important to
allow judges to have broad discretion under the law to
determine an appropriate sentence in any given case, as they
can factor such things as the nature of the offense and the
background and character of each individual defendant. To
create a presumptive minimum jail term as set forth in AB 640
will only serve to needlessly fetter such judicial discretion
and to further erode the trust we bestow on our independent
judiciary."
3)Prior Legislation : AB 441 (Parra), 2007, was similar to AB
640, and was held in Senate Public Safety.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081