BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 650
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  May 6, 2009

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
                             Anna Marie Caballero, Chair
                     AB 650 (Hill) - As Amended:  April 30, 2009
           
          SUBJECT  :  City of Half Moon Bay.

           SUMMARY  :  Directs the Infrastructure and Economic Development  
          Bank (I-Bank) to loan 
          $10 million to the City of Half Moon Bay to assist in the  
          purchase of the Beachwood Property.   Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Directs the I-Bank, pursuant to already established criteria,  
            to loan the City of Half Moon Bay $10 million to enable the  
            City to purchase the property known as the Beachwood Property.

          2)Specifies that this loan is made to assist the City of Half  
            Moon Bay relating to its settlement agreement in the case of  
            Yamagiwa v. City of Half Moon Bay (N.D. Cal. 2007) 523 F.  
            Supp.2d 1036, involving certain property known as the  
            Beachwood Property in the City of Half Moon Bay.

          3)Requires the City of Half Moon Bay, prior to the disbursement  
            of any funds, to obtain an independent appraisal of the  
            Beachwood Property that conforms to the Uniform Standards of  
            Professional Appraisal Practice.

          4)Contains an urgency clause. 

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Specifies the duties and authority of the I-Bank in  
            administering various programs for economic development  
            activities in the state. 

          2)Specifies that I-Bank activities may be funded through the  
            California Infrastructure Bank Fund, which is continuously  
            appropriated.

          3)States that the funds appropriated to the I-Bank can only be  
            used to pay eligible costs, which include the following: all  
            or any part of the cost of construction, renovation, and  
            acquisition of all lands, structures, real or personal  
            property, rights, rights of way, franchises, licenses,  








                                                                  AB 650
                                                                  Page  2

            easements, and interests acquired or used for a project; the  
            cost of demolishing or removing any buildings or structures on  
            land so acquired, including the cost of acquiring any lands to  
            which the buildings or structures may be moved; the cost of  
            all machinery, equipment and financing charges; interest prior  
            to, during, and for a period after, completion of  
            construction, renovation, or acquisition, as determined by the  
            I-Bank; provisions for working capital; reserves for principal  
            and interest and for extensions, enlargements, additions,  
            replacement, renovations, and improvements; and, the cost of  
            architectural, engineering, financial and legal services,  
            plans, specifications, estimates, administrative expenses, and  
            other expenses necessary or incidental to determining the  
            feasibility of any project or incidental to the construction,  
            acquisition, or financing of any project.
          4)Requires the legislative body of the applicant to find, by  
            resolution, each of the following prior to a project being  
            selected for financing by the I-Bank:

             a)   The project facilitates effective and efficient use of  
               existing and future public resources so as to promote  
               economic development and conservation of natural resources;

             b)   The project must develop and enhance public  
               infrastructure in a manner that will attract, create and  
               sustain long-term employment opportunities;

             c)   The project is consistent with the general plan of both  
               the city and county, or only the county for projects in  
               unincorporated areas in which the project is located;

             d)   The proposed financing is appropriate for the specific  
               project; and,

             e)   The project is consistent with the criteria, priorities,  
               and guidelines for the selection of projects adopted by the  
               I-Bank.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   

          1)On November 28, 2007, a federal district court ruled that the  
            City of Half Moon Bay's (City's) construction activities  
            caused man-made wetlands to form on private property,  








                                                                  AB 650
                                                                  Page  3

            precluding previously-approved residential development and  
            constituting a physical taking 
          of the property by the City.  The court awarded the owner of the  
            property approximately 
          $37 million.  Attorneys' fees, pre-judgment interest and other  
            costs increased the City's liability to approximately $41.1  
            million.

          2)According to the City, the sponsor of AB 650, it faced two  
            difficult options as a result of this judgment:  a) Pay the  
            $41.1 million, which would likely bankrupt the City and  
            severely disrupt its basic services and functions; or b)  
            litigate a costly appeal with a risk that the appeal would not  
            succeed.  Faced with near-certain bankruptcy on one hand and  
            an extremely high-risk gamble on the other, the City entered  
            into settlement negotiations with the owner of the property.  

            The final settlement agreement on April 2, 2008, obligates the  
            City to a) approve the entitlements to develop the Beachwood  
            property by June 29, 2009; or, b) pay the owner 
            $18 million for the property by August 29, 2009.  Failure to  
            meet this payment deadline requires the City to pay the owner  
            an interest penalty assessment of 6% annually retroactive to  
            December 2007, and until the amount of the settlement amount  
            and accrued interest are paid in full. 

            The City state's that while the settlement agreement  
            significantly reduced the City's liability, Half Moon Bay's  
            financial situation remains extremely dire.  The City's fiscal  
            year (FY) 2008-2009 budget includes $9 million in general  
            funds, $6 million in special funds, for a total annual  
            municipal budget of $15 million.  The financial obligation of  
            the settlement agreement represents 120% of the City's total  
            budget.

           3)Legislative history  :  During the 2007-2008 legislative  
            session, AB 1991(Mullin) sought relief for the City by  
            authorizing development on the property consistent with a  
            tentative subdivision map previously approved by the City in  
            1990.  The bill exempted the proposed development from  
            obtaining a coastal development permit under the California  
            Coastal Act or the City's certified local coastal program.  AB  
            1991 would have exempted the proposed development from  
            obtaining any permits or approvals (other than existing  
            approvals at the time) under the California Environmental  








                                                                  AB 650
                                                                  Page  4

            Quality Act (CEQA), California Endangered Species Act, the  
            California Fish and Game code, the Porter Cologne Water  
            Quality Act, and certain state highway encroachment permits.   
            AB 1991 passed the State Assembly 46-18 and was held in the  
            Senate Rules Committee.

            AB 650 seeks a different approach to meet the financial burden  
            of the City of Half Moon Bay.  Under AB 650, the City will be  
            able to protect the Beachwood property from future  
            development.  AB 650 provides partial financial relief to meet  
            the terms of the settlement agreement and preserve the  
            property for purposes as a public park.


          4)During the last 20 years, the Legislature has bailed out local  
            governments, school districts, community colleges, and other  
            local entities facing extraordinary financial challenges.  The  
            amount of these bailouts have totaled over several hundred  
            million dollars.  In each case, the financial relief has taken  
            various forms to meet the specific needs of the individual  
            entity facing its own unique circumstance.  Examples of this  
            include:


             a)   In 1995 Merced County was unable to pay $5 million to  
               the California Department of Forestry (CDF) for contracted  
               fire prevention and suppression services.  The state  
               allowed Merced County to pay back these funds over a  
               ten-year period;


             b)   Butte County officials announced that they were $3.5  
               million short in balancing their 

             FY 1989-1990 budget.  Within a three-year period, the Butte  
               County's costs for state required programs grew by $4.7  
               million while revenue only grew by $4 million.  Revenue for  
               discretionary spending declined by 21% during this same  
               period.  The Department of Finance responded by authorizing  
               Butte County to defer payment 
             of $2.8 million for CDF fire services and several other  
               adjustments; and,

             c)   In 2008 the Legislature approved AB 2680 (Adams), which  
               forgave $777,084 of a loan owed to the state by a private  








                                                                  AB 650
                                                                  Page  5

               water company, so that the County of San Bernardino could  
               acquire a failing water system and rebuild it for the  
               citizens of Cedar Glen; without this debt forgiveness it  
               would not have been financially feasible for San Bernardino  
               County to rebuild the water system.  



           








          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          City of Half Moon Bay [SPONSOR]
          Alianto Properties, Inc.
          Bay City Flower Co., Inc.
          CSG Consultants
          Half Moon Bay Coastside Chamber of Commerce and Visitors' Bureau
          Half Moon Bay Parks and Recreation Commission
          Franchi Old World Italian Seeds
          San Mateo County Association of REALTORS
          Individual letters (5)

           Opposition 
           
          Individual letter
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Katie Kolitsos / L. GOV. / (916)  
          319-3958