BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 675
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  May 18, 2009

                     ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION
                             Charles M. Calderon, Chair

                 AB 675 (Gilmore) - As Introduced:  February 25, 2009

                                      SUSPENSE
          
          Majority vote.  Tax levy.  Fiscal committee.

           SUBJECT  :  Personal Income Tax Law:  deductions:  529 college  
          savings plans

           SUMMARY  :  Allows a deduction under the Personal Income Tax Law  
          for contributions made to a qualified tuition program (QTP), as  
          specified.  Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Allows, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1,  
            2009, a deduction equal to the lesser of:

             a)   The amount contributed by a "qualified taxpayer" during  
               the taxable year to a QTP under Internal Revenue Code (IRC)  
               Section 529, as modified by state law; or,

             b)   $3,000 in the case of a taxpayer who is single or is a  
               married individual filing a separate return, or $6,000 in  
               the case of a taxpayer who is a married individual filing a  
               joint return or an individual filing a head of household  
               return.  

          2)Defines "qualified taxpayer" as an individual who, on behalf  
            of a beneficiary, contributes money to a QTP and meets all of  
            the other applicable requirements of IRC Section 529, as  
            modified by state law.

          3)Provides that the deduction shall not be subject to the 2%  
            floor that generally applies to miscellaneous itemized  
            deductions. 

          4)Provides that the deduction shall be taken with respect to the  
            taxable year in which the contribution is made.

          5)Take immediate effect as a tax levy.









                                                                  AB 675
                                                                  Page  2

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Allows individuals to deduct either a fixed amount, indexed  
            for inflation, known as the standard deduction, or the amount  
            of a taxpayer's itemized deductions, whichever is greater.   
            Certain expenses, such as medical expenses, charitable  
            contributions, interest, and taxes, are deductible as itemized  
            deductions.  The law also provides for "miscellaneous itemized  
            deductions", which are those itemized deductions not  
            specifically listed in IRC Section 67(b).  As a general rule,  
            miscellaneous itemized deductions are allowed only to the  
            extent that the aggregate of such deductions exceeds 2% of  
            adjusted gross income.     

          2)Provides tax-exempt status to QTPs.  QTPs are programs  
            established and maintained by a State (or by an eligible  
            educational institution) under which a person may purchase  
            tuition credits or make cash contributions to meet the  
            qualified higher education expenses of a designated  
            beneficiary.  Contributions to a QTP cannot exceed the amount  
            necessary to provide for the beneficiary's qualified higher  
            education expenses.  Distributions to a beneficiary are  
            excluded from income.  However, contributions made to a QTP  
            are not deductible.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  The Franchise Tax Board estimates that this bill  
          would reduce state revenues by $25 million in fiscal year (FY)  
          2009-10, $29 million in FY 2010-11, and $35 million in FY  
          2011-12. 

           COMMENTS  :

          1)The author states, "Facing rising costs and economic  
            uncertainty, more and more Central Valley families are having  
            a difficult time affording a college education for their  
            children.  It is a tragedy that all that is standing in the  
            way of a college education and a bright future for so many  
            students in our community is cost.  By allowing pre-tax  
            deductions for contributions for college savings, we can make  
            the dream of a college education come true for so many more  
            deserving students in California."  

          2)Proponents state, "In creating the 529 program the federal  
            government left it up to the states to add further incentives.  
             The enormity of the cost of post-secondary education can be  








                                                                  AB 675
                                                                  Page  3

            alleviated if parents and young people have a clear incentive  
            to start saving early."

          3)Opponents state, "The state already provides enormous college  
            benefits to Californians through the state university, college  
            and community college system.  We do not believe state  
            taxpayers should be asked to subsidize additional college  
            savings accounts, particularly since the motivation to save  
            for college is already so strong.  More specifically, the  
            families that cannot afford college education are in lower tax  
            brackets and cannot save, and therefore those most in need of  
            assistance will not benefit from this program.  The cost of  
            such savings would be better put to direct student aid."

          4)Committee Staff Notes:

              a)   Conformity issues  :  As noted above, California conforms  
               to IRC Section 529, with slight modifications.  In general,  
               state conformity with federal law promotes greater  
               simplicity and eases administration of complex tax laws.   
               By providing a deduction for contributions made to QTPs,  
               this bill would bring California out of conformity with  
               federal law.   
              
              b)   What are "qualified higher education expenses"?  :  IRC  
               Section 529 defines the term to mean "tuition, fees, books,  
               supplies, and equipment required for the enrollment or  
               attendance of a designated beneficiary at an eligible  
               educational institution."  The American Recovery and  
               Reinvestment Act, however, temporarily expanded the list of  
               expenses eligible for tax-free withdrawals from a 529  
               account.  In 2009 and 2010, the term "qualified higher  
               education expenses" includes, at the federal level,  
               "computer technology or equipment" and Internet access and  
               related services.    
              


              c)   Related legislation  :

               i)     SB 323 (Oropeza) of the current Legislative Session  
                 would allow taxpayers to direct an amount in excess of  
                 their tax liability to a QTP account.  This bill is  
                 currently in the Senate Appropriations Committee.









                                                                  AB 675
                                                                  Page  4

               ii)    AB 819 (Runner) of the 2007-08 Legislative Session  
                 would have allowed an above-the-line deduction for  
                 contributions made by a qualified taxpayer to a QTP.  AB  
                 819 was held in this Committee.  

               iii)   SB 643 (Florez) of the 2007-08 Legislative Session  
                 would have allowed a deduction for contributions made by  
                 a qualified taxpayer to a QTP.  SB 643 was held in the  
                 Senate Committee on Revenue and Taxation. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Board of Equalization Member Bill Leonard
          Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association

           Opposition 
           
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees,  
          AFL-CIO
          California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO
          California Tax Reform Association 
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  M. David Ruff  / REV. & TAX. / (916)  
          319-2098