BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                        
                       SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE
                        Senator Patricia Wiggins, Chair


          BILL NO:  AB 715                     HEARING:  6/17/09
          AUTHOR:  Caballero                   FISCAL:  No
          VERSION:  6/10/09                    CONSULTANT:  Ho

                           CITY AND COUNTY ORDINANCES
          
                           Background and Existing Law  

          Within 15 days of a city ordinance's adoption, a city clerk  
          must publish the ordinance along with the names of the city  
          council members voting for and against the ordinance in a  
          general circulation newspaper that is printed, published,  
          and circulated in the city.  If the city does not have a  
          general circulation newspaper, the city clerk must post the  
          ordinance in at least three public places in the city or  
          publish the ordinance in a general circulation newspaper  
          printed and published in the county and circulated in the  
          city.  

          Similarly, within 15 days of a county ordinance's adoption,  
          the county board of supervisors must publish the ordinance  
          along with the names of the board members voting for and  
          against the ordinance in a general circulation newspaper  
          that is printed and published in the county.  If the county  
          does not have a general circulation newspaper, the board  
          must post the ordinance in the board's chambers for at  
          least one week. 

          These ordinance publishing requirements have been in place  
          for over 125 years for cities and over 110 years for  
          counties.  City and county officials believe it is time for  
          the Legislature to update the requirements to reflect  
          changes in the ways Californians communicate and access  
          information.


                                   Proposed Law  

          I.   Posting on the Internet  .  Assembly Bill 715 authorizes  
          cities and counties to post, within 15 days of passage,  
          adopted ordinances on their official Internet websites in  
          lieu of publishing the ordinances in general circulation  
          newspapers.  





          AB 715 -- 6/10/09 -- Page 2



          II.   Mailed notices  .  Assembly Bill 715 requires a city or  
          county that chooses to post an adopted ordinance on its  
          website to also mail, within 15 days of passage, a notice  
          of adoption of the ordinance to each person who has sent in  
          a written request to receive such mailed notices.  AB 715  
          requires written requests to expire at the end of each  
          calendar year and allows residents to renew their  
          subscriptions after January 1 of each year.  The bill  
          further permits a local agency to charge a fee for mailing  
          the notice, but the fee must not exceed the cost of mailing  
          the notice.

          III.   Notice to newspaper readers  .  If a city or county  
          chooses to post an adopted ordinance on its website,  
          Assembly Bill 715 requires the city or county to publish a  
          legal advertisement in a general circulation newspaper for  
          a minimum of once a week for four successive weeks to  
          inform the public of the following:
                 When the city or county will begin posting adopted  
               ordinances solely on the Internet;
                 The website address where the ordinance will be  
               posted; and
                 Information on how residents can obtain mailed  
               notices of adopted ordinances. 


                                     Comments  

          1.   A welcome alternative  .  Newspaper publication of  
          ordinances made sense when the newspaper was the most  
          practical form of communication between a local government  
          and its constituents.  However, a recent study found that  
          70% of Californians use the Internet.  As more people turn  
          to the Internet as their primary source of information,  
          newspaper publication requirements place unnecessary  
          financial burdens on cities and counties.  The larger  
          general law cities pay close to $6,000 a year and at least  
          one county pays $10,000 a year to publish ordinances in the  
          newspapers.  While these costs are small compared to their  
          overall budgets, local officials doubt these published  
          ordinances adequately serve the public because many  
          newspapers that have been adjudicated by the courts as  
          "newspapers of general circulation" are not necessarily the  
          most widely read newspapers in their communities.  For  
          example, the City of Buena Park, which has a population of  
          83,000, reports that it must publish its notices in the  





          AB 715 -- 6/10/09 -- Page 3



          Buena Park Independent, which only has 380 subscribers.   
          Furthermore, about half of the state's general law cities  
          post adopted ordinances in three public places because they  
          don't have general circulation newspapers available.  In  
          those cities, electronic publication of ordinances will  
          greatly increase public access to new ordinances.  By  
          giving cities and counties the option to publish their  
          ordinances electronically and mail notices of passage to  
          interested residents, AB 715 takes a step towards giving  
          local governments more flexibility in how they can  
          communicate government actions with their constituents.  AB  
          715 is not a new mandate, just a new option for local  
          governments.  

          2.   An inadequate alternative  .  Because the public has long  
          turned to general circulation newspapers to learn about  
          community news and events, it makes sense for these  
          newspapers to publish public notices and ordinances.   
          Newspaper publishers question whether electronic  
          publication of ordinances is an appropriate substitute for  
          publishing ordinances in the newspaper.  Diminishing the  
          availability and visibility of those important legislative  
          actions undermines statewide open government goals.  While  
          local government notices appear in newspapers that meet  
          certain quality and content standards, there are no  
          statewide standards for local government websites.  There's  
          nothing preventing a city or county from posting ordinances  
          in hard-to-find areas of their websites.  Opponents also  
          worry that AB 715 will lead to less civic participation  
          among populations with limited access to computers and the  
          Internet.  A recent study found that in California, adults  
          with household incomes below $40,000 and adults age 55 and  
          older are much less likely to use the Internet than other  
          groups.  While AB 715 tries to accommodate populations with  
          limited access to computers and the Internet by giving them  
          the option to receive mailed notices, the Committee may  
          wish to consider whether people will file written requests.  
           Electronic publication of ordinances may benefit some  
          populations, but may hurt others.  If local officials want  
          to enhance public awareness and participation, then they  
          should post the ordinances online in addition to publishing  
          the ordinances. 

          3.   Beyond counties  .  As the Legislature has revised  
          special districts' principal acts, it has authorized  
          several special districts, including community service  





          AB 715 -- 6/10/09 -- Page 4



          districts, fire districts, cemetery districts, and  
          recreation and park districts, to follow counties'  
          procedures for adopting ordinances.  By changing counties'  
          requirements for publishing adopted ordinances, AB 715 also  
          changes the ordinance publishing requirements for some  
          types of special districts.  


                                 Assembly Actions  

          Assembly Local Government Committee:  7-0
          Assembly Floor:                    75-0







































          AB 715 -- 6/10/09 -- Page 5




                         Support and Opposition  (6/11/09)

           Support  :  City Clerks Association of California, California  
          Association of Clerks and Election Officials, California  
          State Association of Counties, Lake County News, League of  
          California Cities; Cities of Albany, Antioch, Buena Park,  
          Calipatria, Canyon Lake, Carpinteria, Claremont, Clearlake,  
          Cloverdale, Concord, Costa Mesa, Cypress, Duarte,  
          Escondido, Fort Bragg, Grass Valley, Healdsburg, Hesperia,  
          Hollister, Huntington Beach, Huntington Park, Jackson,  
          Kerman, La Puente, Lathrop, Lemon Grove, Malibu, Menlo  
          Park, Merced, Mission Viejo, Mount Shasta, Murrieta,  
          Oakley, Ontario, Oxnard, Palm Desert, Perris, Pleasanton,  
          Port Hueneme, Poway, Rancho Cordova, Rancho Mirage,  
          Redding, Riverbank, Sacramento, San Bruno, San Dimas, San  
          Fernando, San Juan Capistrano, San Luis Obispo, Santa  
          Maria, Santa Rosa, Saratoga, Seaside, Selma, Signal Hill,  
          Solana Beach, Solvang, Tehachapi, Temecula, Town of Portola  
          Valley, Tulare, Upland, Waterford, Westminster, Williams;  
          Counties of Orange, Santa Clara.


           Opposition  :  California Newspaper Publishers Association,  
          Antelope Valley Newspapers Inc., Black Voice News, Blue  
          Pacific News, Culver City News, Gardena Valley News, Herald  
          Publications Inc., Los Angeles Newspaper Group, Mattos  
          Newspaper Inc., Mountain Democrat, OCNN Newspapers,  
          Press-Enterprise, Salinas Californian, San Diego  
          Neighborhood Newspapers, Santa Monica Daily Press, Sonoma  
          Index-Tribune, Sonoma West Publishers Inc., Star-News,  
          Tahoe Daily Tribune, Ukiah Group Publisher; Darlene  
          Dukelow-Burton, Ellisa May, Eric Parmater, Gary Lendennie.