BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           758 (Skinner)
          
          Hearing Date:  08/27/2009           Amended: 08/17/2009
          Consultant:  Brendan McCarthy   Policy Vote: EU&C 11-0














































          AB 758 (Skinner)
          Page 2


          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY: This bill requires the Energy Commission to  
          develop and implement a program to achieve additional energy  
          efficiency savings in existing commercial and residential  
          buildings. The bill requires the Public Utilities Commission to  
          investigate the ability of electricity and natural gas utilities  
          to provide financing to their customers to pay for energy  
          efficiency measures. The bill requires municipal utilities to  
          implement an energy efficiency program.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2009-10      2010-11       2011-12     Fund
           
          Energy Commission      $900       $1,800      $1,800    Federal 
             regulatory activities

          Implementation of additional      Unknown               Federal
             energy efficiency programs                           

          Public Utilities Commission       $58         $115       
          $115Special *
             proceeding

          * Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement Account.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: Suspense file. 
          
          Approximately 75 percent of homes and apartments in the state  
          were developed prior to the adoption of building energy  
          efficiency standards by the Energy Commission in 1982.

          Current law requires the California Energy Commission to  
          establish criteria for a statewide home energy rating system for  
          residential buildings and to develop materials to educate  
          property owners about energy efficiency options. Current law  
          also gives the Commission authority to develop energy efficiency  
          standards for buildings and certain appliances. In 2005, the  
          Energy Commission released a report on potential energy  
          efficiency measures that could be adopted in existing commercial  
          and residential buildings. The report found that cost effective  







          AB 758 (Skinner)
          Page 2


          energy efficiency measures could reduce statewide consumption of  
          electricity and natural gas by 15 to 18 percent.

          Under current law, the Public Utilities Commission is authorized  
          to establish energy efficiency targets for electricity and  
          natural gas utilities under its jurisdiction. The Public  
          Utilities Commission is also authorized to require utilities to  
          provide energy efficiency programs for their customers. In the  
          2009-2011 program cycle, the Public Utilities Commission has  
          authorized the utilities to spend about $1 billion per year in  
          ratepayer funds for energy efficiency programs.

          This bill requires the Energy Commission to begin a regulatory  
          proceeding to develop and implement a program to achieve greater  
          efficiency savings in existing residential and commercial  
          buildings. The Energy Commission is authorized to include energy  
          assessments, energy efficiency improvements, financing options  
          for efficiency projects, public education, and other strategies.  
          The Energy Commission is required to coordinate its activities  
          with the Public Utilities Commission and a variety of other  
          public and private entities. The program developed by the Energy  
          Commission may include both utility and non-utility administered  
          energy efficiency programs. The Energy Commission is required to  
          include information developed through the proceeding in an  
          existing report to the Legislature.

          The Energy Commission indicates that the cost to develop and  
          adopt the program required in the bill, including staff and  
          contract costs, to be about $1.8 million per year. Because the  
          exact nature of the program to be developed is unknown, the  
          costs to implement such a large scale energy efficiency program  
          are unknown.

          The bill requires the Public Utilities Commission to open or  
          modify an existing regulatory proceeding to determine whether  
          utilities under its jurisdiction can provide financing options  
          to their customers to implement the program developed by the  
          Energy Commission. The Public Utilities Commission is also  
          required to report on the utilities' implementation of the  
          program. The Public Utilities Commission indicates that the cost  
          to comply with the bill's requirements would be about $115,000  
          per year.

          The bill requires municipal utilities to implement energy  
          efficiency programs and to include information on their efforts  







          AB 758 (Skinner)
          Page 2


          in an existing report to the Energy Commission. The costs for  
          the municipal utilities to comply with this requirement are  
          unknown. However, because the municipal utilities have the  
          authority to charge users for the costs of the bill, there would  
          be no reimbursable state mandate for these costs.

          This bill is substantially similar to AB 2678 (Nunez, 2008)  
          which was held in this committee.