BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 850
                                                                  Page 1

          Date of Hearing:  April 28, 2009

                           ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY
                                  Mike Feuer, Chair
               AB 850 (De La Torre) - As Introduced: February 26, 2009
                                           
                     PROPOSED CONSENT (As Proposed to be Amended)  

          SUBJECT  : CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: PUBLIC CONTRACTS

           KEY ISSUE  :  SHOULD THE EXISTING PROHIBITION REGARDING CONFLICTS  
          OF INTEREST IN THE AWARD OF PUBLIC CONTRACTS BE BROADENED TO  
          PROHIBIT OTHERS FROM INDUCING OR PARTICIPATING IN A VIOLATION  
          WITH A PUBLIC OFFICIAL?

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  As currently in print this bill is keyed fiscal.

                                      SYNOPSIS
          
          Members of the Legislature and other public officials and  
          employees are prohibited from having a financial interest in any  
          contract made by them in their official capacity or by any body  
          or board of which they are a member.  This sensible measure  
          would extend that protection against conflicts of interest to  
          anyone who knowingly induces or participates with a covered  
          public official in a violation of that law.  There is no known  
          opposition.

           SUMMARY  :  Prohibits participation in or inducement to violate  
          public conflict of interest prohibitions.  Specifically,  this  
          bill  provides that no person shall knowingly induce or  
          participate in or conspire with a public official to violate the  
          law prohibiting financial conflicts of interest in the award of  
          public contracts.

           EXISTING LAW  provides that members of the Legislature, state,  
          county, district, judicial district, and city officers or  
          employees shall not be financially interested in any contract  
          made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board  
          of which they are members.  Nor shall state, county, district,  
          judicial district, and city officers or employees be purchasers  
          at any sale or vendors at any purchase made by them in their  
          official capacity.  (Government Code Section 1090.) 

           COMMENTS  :  The author explains the reason for the bill as  








                                                                  AB 850
                                                                  Page 2

          follows: "Under current law, Government Code section 1090  
          prohibits members of the Legislature and [others] from being  
          financially interested in any contract made by them in their  
          official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are  
          members.  In several cities throughout California, elected or  
          appointed officials have been convicted in cases involving  
          illegal expenditures of public funds.  Assembly Bill 850  
          protects the expenditure of public money by eliminating  
          temptation, avoiding the appearance of impropriety, and assuring  
          the public entity of the official's undivided and uncompromised  
          allegiance by holding all parties accountable for corrupt  
          actions.  Assembly Bill 850 will protect public funds by  
          extending liability to include not just elected officials but  
          third parties who are also participants of the corrupt schemes.   
          This bill will provide that the associated contractual party can  
          also be held liable for the wrongdoing associated with the  
          corrupt expenditure of public funds."

           This Bill Responds To Shortcomings in the Law Revealed by the  
          Klistoff Case.   In Klistoff v. Superior Court, 157 Cal. App. 4th  
          469 (2007) the City of South Gate sued a waste hauling business  
          and its principal (Klistoff) for conspiracy to violate  
          Government Code section1090 alleging that the principal, through  
          the waste hauling business, made payments to a city official in  
          exchange for the official's efforts to ensure that a refuse  
          collection and recycling services provider, in which the  
          principal was vice-president and operations manager, obtained a  
          contract from the city.  The court held that because only public  
          officials or employees can violate section 1090, the principal  
          and the waste hauling business, who were not public officials or  
          employees, could not be held liable for conspiracy to violate  
          section 1090. 

           Author's Clarifying Amendment  .  To better capture the intent of  
          the measure, the author appropriately proposes to replace the  
          current proposed subdivision (c) with the following language:

          (c)  No person shall knowingly induce or participate in a  
          violation of subdivision (a) or conspire with a person subject  
          to subdivision (a) to commit a violation of this section.

          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           








                                                                  AB 850
                                                                  Page 3

          None on file

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :  Kevin G. Baker / JUD. / (916) 319-2334