BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 852|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 852
          Author:   Fong (D)
          Amended:  7/19/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE REVENUE & TAXATION COMMITTEE  :  5-2,  7/8/09
          AYES:  Wolk, Alquist, Florez, Padilla, Wiggins
          NOES:  Walters, Ashburn
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8 

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  52-27, 5/28/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Property taxation:  statement

           SOURCE  :     California Assessors Association


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes the county assessor to  
          refuse to accept any property statement that is not in the  
          requested format and to require the electronic filing of a  
          property statement, as provided.  This bill requires the  
          county assessor, if he or she requires a property statement  
          to be filed electronically, to notify the taxpayer, in  
          writing, of this requirement.  This bill authorizes a  
          county assessor to apply a penalty on a taxpayer, as  
          provided, if a taxpayer fails to file a property statement  
          electronically.  This bill requires the State Board of  
          Equalization (BOE) to adopt equipment category codes, as  
          specified, and requires taxpayers filing a property  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 852
                                                                Page  
          2

          statement electronically to use the equipment category  
          codes, as specified.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires taxpayers that meet  
          certain criteria to file a signed property statement with  
          the county assessor.  Existing law authorizes the county  
          assessor to refuse to accept any property statement that he  
          or she determines to be in error and to accept the filing  
          of a property statement by the use of electronic media.

          This bill allows assessors to require taxpayers to submit  
          property statements under the following conditions:

          1.The taxpayer submits the statement in a form of Internet  
            media and pursuant to methods specified by the Assessors  
            and BOE.

          2.The taxpayer submits the statement with an electronic  
            signature verified by procedures set forth by the  
            Assessors and BOE.  

          3.The assessor must notify the taxpayer of the electronic  
            filing requirement.  However, the taxpayer need not  
            comply until the year after notification.  The one-year  
            period to comply with all existing filing requirements  
            and deadlines with paper filings is to begin on the date  
            the notification is sent to the taxpayer.

          4.The value of the taxpayer's personal property exceeds  
            $100,000.

          5.An assessor who requires a taxpayer to file a property  
            statement electronically may apply a penalty on a  
            taxpayer if the taxpayer fails to file the property  
            statement electronically.

          This bill allows the assessor to exempt from the electronic  
          filing requirement  a taxpayer who demonstrates that the  
          requirement places an undue burden on his or her business.

          This bill additionally requires BOE, in consultation with  
          the California Assessors' Association and representatives  
          of taxpayers to adopt equipment category codes for  
          electronically filed property statements by January 1,  







                                                                AB 852
                                                                Page  
          3

          2011, and for taxpayers to use those codes after January 1,  
          2012.  An assessor is not to penalize a taxpayer for  
          failing to use the equipment category codes if the BOE  
          fails to adopt the equipment category codes on or before  
          January 1, 2011.

           Comments
           
          According to the author's office, "AB 852 directs the Board  
          of Equalization to adopt equipment category descriptions,  
          in consultation with assessors and taxpayers, and allows an  
          assessor to require a business to file electronically.   
          This bill will provide incentives to assessors and  
          businesses to make the necessary transitions in their  
          electronic processing systems such that Business Property  
          Statements can be filed and accepted electronically  
          statewide.  AB 853 will decrease the amount of paper  
          filings, which in turn will reduce human errors and costs  
          associated with postage, processing, and data entry."

          The purpose of this bill is to provide incentives to  
          assessors and businesses to make the necessary transitions  
          in their electronic processing systems, such that business  
          property statements can be filed and accepted  
          electronically statewide. 

          The California Assessors' Association, states that this  
          bill, by requiring businesses to file their business  
          property statements electronically, will establish  
          uniformity and will reduce errors and costs associated with  
          paper filings. 

          Personal property used in a trade or business is,  
          generally, taxable, and the taxpayer who owns that property  
          must annually report the cost of that property to the local  
          assessor by filing a property statement (Form 571).  Many  
          assessors provide an opportunity for businesses to file  
          their property statements electronically, via an  
          interactive, online filing system.  In 2004, local county  
          assessors created a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for  
          Standard Data Record Development (SDR) and Year to Year  
          Support. Currently, more than 40 counties participate in  
          the program.  The SDR system is designed to simplify the  
          process of filing annual property statements for businesses  







                                                                AB 852
                                                                Page  
          4

          that have multiple locations in one or more California  
          counties.  The system allows a business to upload data  
          directly from its internal data processing system into SDR,  
          which will deliver the data to the corresponding county  
          assessor.  The goal of the SDR system is to allow major  
          corporations to bypass filing a business property statement  
          in every county in which they have a business presence.  In  
          addition, assessors could reduce the costs associated with  
          processing data from the paper statements if statements are  
          filed electronically.  Finally, business filing  
          electronically via the SDR system would receive their  
          estimated assessed values earlier and the assessors could  
          process filings with fewer errors. 

          The SDR system, however, only accepts business property  
          statements that are filed electronically in the approved  
          XML file format, and, in order to create SDR files, a  
          business must have the SDR software and special  
          programming.  Arguably, the level of effort and investment  
          may not be practical for businesses that are filing for a  
          single location.  Some counties allow taxpayers to submit  
          their business property statements via the Internet,  
          requiring no special data format.  Generally, this sort of  
          e-filing is designed for small and medium business owners.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/18/09)

          California Assessors' Association (source) 
          Board of Equalization
          Santa Clara County Assessor 

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/18/09)

          California Farm Bureau Association


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans,  
            Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Gilmore, Hall,  







                                                                AB 852
                                                                Page  
          5

            Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones,  
            Krekorian, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning,  
            Nava, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Price,  
            Ruskin, Salas, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson,  
            Torres, Torrico, Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Conway, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson,  
            Fletcher, Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Hagman, Jeffries,  
            Knight, Logue, Miller, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, Silva,  
            Smyth, Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Saldana


          DLW:nl  8/18/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****