BILL ANALYSIS
AB 870
Page 1
Date of Hearing: April 29, 2009
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 870 (Huber) - As Amended: April 13, 2009
Policy Committee: Public
SafetyVote: 7-0
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
Yes Reimbursable: No
SUMMARY
This bill adds razor blades and box cutters to the list of
weapons that may not be possessed on the grounds of any public
or private K-12 school and makes a violation punishable by up to
one year in county jail.
FISCAL EFFECT
Nonreimbursable local law enforcement and incarceration costs.
In 2007 and 2008 combined, four persons were committed to state
prison for the felony offense of bringing prohibited weapons
onto K-12 grounds. While misdemeanor convictions are likely to
be considerably greater than this figure, local costs should not
be significant.
COMMENTS
1)Rationale . The author and proponents (law enforcement
entities) contend this bill closes a loophole regarding
prohibitions on the possession of weapons on school campuses
by specifically adding razor blades and box cutters to the
list of prohibited weapons.
According to the L.A. District Attorney's Office, "Currently,
Penal Code section 626.10(a) bans possession of a 'razor with
an unguarded blade.' As noted in one recent court opinion,
this same phrase appears in five other statutes but is not
statutorily defined [In re Do Kyung K. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th
583, 590]. Faced with the question of whether possession of a
single razor blade on school grounds violated Penal Code
AB 870
Page 2
section 626.10(a), the court construed the phrase 'razor with
an unguarded blade' to mean that an unguarded blade is a
component, rather than the entirety, of the razor (Id. at
593). Thus, the court concluded that possession of a single
razor blade did not violate the statute (Id. at 594).
"In 2004, the court revisited the definition of 'razor with an
unguarded blade' when faced with the question of whether
possession of a box cutter on school grounds violated Penal
Code Section 626.10(a) [In re Michael R. (2004) 120 Cal.App.
4th 1203, 1205]. Michael R. had a box cutter with a
single-edged blade in his pocket. The blade retracted into the
handle of the instrument but did not lock into place. The
trial court sustained the petition, explaining that all razors
are capable of being guarded in some fashion and it would
defeat the purpose of the statute to say a box cutter didn't
qualify as a prohibited weapon. The Court of Appeals, however,
disagreed. It ruled that the box cutter did not qualify as a
razor, as defined by In re Do Kyung K. but was not prohibited
by Penal Code Section 626.10(a)."
2)Current law provides that possession of a dirk, dagger, ice
pick, a knife having a blade longer than two and one-half
inches, a folding knife with a blade that locks into place, a
razor with an unguarded blade, a taser, a stun gun as defined,
an instrument that expels a metallic projectile such as a BB
or pellet, through the force of air pressure, CO2 pressure, or
spring action, or a spot marker gun on K-12 school grounds is
a wobbler, punishable by up to 1 year in county jail, or 16
months, 2, or 3 years in state prison.
Analysis Prepared by : Geoff Long / APPR. / (916) 319-2081