BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 892|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 892
          Author:   Furutani (D)
          Amended:  7/9/09 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMM  :  9-0, 7/7/09
          AYES: Lowenthal, Huff, Ashburn, DeSaulnier, Harman,  
            Hollingsworth, Pavley, Simitian, Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Kehoe, Oropeza

           SENATE ENV. QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 7/13/09
          AYES:  Simitian, Runner, Ashburn, Corbett, Hancock,  
            Lowenthal, Pavley

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8 

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 6/1/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program

           SOURCE  :     South Coast Air Quality Management District


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides that returned or unspent  
          funds from an obligated contract received by a local agency  
          under the Goods Movement Emission Reduction Program (GMERP)  
          may either be awarded to fund other equipment projects  
          included on the same competitively ranked list approved by  
          the Air Resources Board (ARB) pursuant to the grant  
          agreement, or be returned to ARB for reallocation to other  
          projects in the same source category in the same trade  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 892
                                                                Page  
          2

          corridor.  This bill also allows ARB not to allocate funds  
          to a local agency until the local agency is ready to enter  
          into a contract with an equipment owner.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law, under the GMERP Law:

           1.   Requires an applicant (local public entity (air  
               pollution control district)) receiving funds under the  
               program to have up to 2 years from the date funds are  
               allocated to award a contract for a project, or else  
               the funds revert to the California Ports  
               Infrastructure, Security, and Air Quality Improvement  
               Account (Account) for allocation.  Funds not  
               liquidated within 4 years of the contract award date  
               between the applicant and the contractor must also  
               revert to that Account.

           2.   Requires the State Air Resources Board (ARB) to  
               submit an annual report to the Legislature summarizing  
               its activities related to administration of the GMERP  
               Law.  The report must include information relating to  
               funded projects, allocated funds, project locations,  
               project status, and project emission reductions.

          This bill:

           1.   Authorizes returned funds or unspent funds from  
               obligated contracts received by the applicant prior to  
               the end of the 4 year liquidation period to be awarded  
               by the applicant to fund equipment projects included  
               on the same competitively ranked list approved by the  
               ARB pursuant to the grant agreement, or if there are  
               no other eligible projects included on that list,  
               returned to the ARB for reallocation to an applicant  
               pursuant to ARB guidelines.  The ARB guidelines must  
               follow certain priorities and all funds allocated by  
               the applicant must be liquidated within 4 years of the  
               original contract award or must revert to the Account.

           2.   Requires ARB to include a description of any changes  
               to the grant agreement scope or changes to grant award  
               amounts.

           Background







                                                               AB 892
                                                                Page  
          3

           
          The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality and Port  
          Security Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1B), approved by  
          voters November 2006, included provisions for $1 billion to  
          reduce emissions associated with freight movement along the  
          state's trade corridors.  SB 88 (Committee on Budget and  
          Fiscal Review) Chapter 181, Statutes of 2007, among other  
          things included the GMERP Law to provide guidance for ARB  
          to implement the program.

          ARB must consider certain criteria in evaluating projects  
          (e.g., emission reduction magnitude, public health benefit,  
          cost-effectiveness; reduction in greenhouse gases; degree  
          to which funds are leveraged from other sources).  Projects  
          eligible for funding include replacement, repower, or  
          retrofit of heavy-duty diesel trucks, diesel locomotive  
          engines, harbor craft, and cargo handling equipment;  
          on-shore electrical power; mobile or portable shoreside  
          distributed power generation; and infrastructure  
          electrification to reduce engine idling.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/17/09)

          Automobile Club of Southern California
          Bay Area Air Quality Management District
          California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
          California State Automobile Association
          Harbor Association of Industry & Commerce
          San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author, "Due to  
          the slowing economy, some GMERP recipients are backing out  
          of their contracts and returning GMERP funds to the  
          district.  This may occur because a company cannot fund  
          their share of the project, or the company is simply going  
          out of business.  Although the local air districts have  
          dozens of qualified projects waiting to receive GMERP  
          funding, current law does not allow the air district to  
          apply the returned funds to otherwise qualified projects.   
          Funds must be returned to the main Prop 1B account,  
          re-appropriated by the legislature, and then awarded by the  







                                                                AB 892
                                                                Page  
          4

          [ARB]."

          The author notes that this bill "would allow funds  
          resulting from a cancelled contract to be applied to an  
          approved back-up project.  If no eligible project exists,  
          then funds would revert to the [ARB].  The amendment would  
          not change current law with respect to total time a  
          district has to liquidate funds."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Tom  
            Berryhill, Blakeslee, Blumenfield, Brownley, Buchanan,  
            Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway,  
            Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Duvall,  
            Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes,  
            Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore,  
            Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber,  
            Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu, Logue,  
            Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava,  
            Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva,  
            Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED: Bill Berryhill,  Block


          JA:nl  8/17/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****