BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   AB 898|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 898
          Author:   Lieu (D)
          Amended:  6/30/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  4-1, 06/23/09
          AYES:  Corbett, Harman, Florez, Leno
          NOES:  Walters

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  49-29, 05/21/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Notaries public:  Power of Attorney, Protests,  
          and Other
                        Documents

           SOURCE  :     Secretary of State Debra Bowen


           DIGEST  :    This bill makes three changes to the law  
          governing notaries public:  (1) it authorizes the Secretary  
          of State to refuse to process (authenticate) documents that  
          are clearly intended for fraudulent purposes, (2) it  
          prohibits the use of a subscribing witness when  
          establishing a power of attorney, just as a subscribing  
          witness cannot now be used for real property documents that  
          must be recorded, and (3) it eliminates the duty of a  
          notary public to process antiquated documents (i.e.,  
          "protests" of nonpayment of negotiable instruments), unless  
          the notary public works for a financial institution.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law prohibits a proof of execution of  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                AB 898
                                                                Page  
          2

          any of several types of specified documents, including a  
          grant deed, mortgage, deed of trust, quitclaim deed, or  
          security agreement as it relates to the recording of  
          transfers of property, by use of a "subscribing witness."  
          (Civ. Code Sec. 1195.)

          This bill adds, to the list of documents that may not be  
          acknowledged by use of a subscribing witness, a power of  
          attorney.

          This bill expressly prohibits the use of proof of execution  
          to acknowledge any instrument that requires a notary public  
          to obtain a thumbprint from the party signing the document  
          in the notary public's journal.

          Existing law provides that a protest is a certificate of  
          dishonor (of a payment claimed) made by a United States  
          consul or vice consul, or a notary public or other person  
          authorized to administer oaths by the law of the place  
          where the dishonor occurs. (Cal. U. Com. Code Sec.  
          3505(b).)

          This bill permits only a notary public during the course  
          and scope of employment with a financial institution (in  
          addition to a U.S. consul or vice consul or other person  
          authorized by the law of the state, government or country  
          where the dishonor occurred) to issue a protest.

          Existing law defines the duties of a notary public,  
          including the duty to demand acceptance and payment of  
          foreign and inland bills of exchange, or promissory notes,  
          to protest them for nonacceptance and nonpayment.

          This bill limits this duty to notaries public who are  
          employed by a financial institution during the course and  
          scope of the notary's employment with the financial  
          institution. 

          The bill makes other conforming changes to the law  
          governing the charging of fees by notaries public.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No








                                                                AB 898
                                                                Page  
          3

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/30/09)

          Secretary of State Debra Bowen (source) 
          American Society of Notaries
          City of Riverside
          National Notary Association
          United States Notary Association


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office:

               As the economy worsens and home property values  
               continue to drop dramatically, blatant and costly  
               scams have arisen to defraud hardworking Californians  
               of their well-deserved money.  Many of these scams and  
               fraudulent documents have become much more  
               sophisticated and appear to an average Californian as  
               being legitimate.  These scams are pushing many  
               Californians into deeper debt and must be alleviated.   
               AB 898 addresses many of these activities by  
               preventing document fraud.

          The National Notary Association is in support because it  
          "provides needed updates to certain California notarial  
          statutes and will better equip Notaries to serve as the  
          state's front line of defense against document fraud. ? The  
          NNA is in agreement with AB 898's stipulation that only  
          Notaries in financial institutions be allowed to perform  
          the Protest.  Our experience has shown that Notaries who  
          perform this as a notarial act should have the appropriate  
          business/commercial training and we therefore concur that  
          the act should only be performed by Notaries within  
          financial organizations."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :
          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Eng, Evans,  
            Feuer, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Hall, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones, Krekorian, Lieu,  
            Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, John A.  
            Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Price, Ruskin, Salas,  
            Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico,  







                                                                AB 898
                                                                Page  
          4

            Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Conway, Cook, DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson,  
            Fletcher, Fuller, Gaines, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman,  
            Harkey, Jeffries, Knight, Logue, Miller, Nestande,  
            Niello, Nielsen, Silva, Smyth, Audra Strickland, Tran,  
            Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Fong, Saldana


          RJG:nl  6/30/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****