BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 914
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 13, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                    AB 914 (Logue) - As Amended:  April 23, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Environmental  
          Safety       Vote:                            7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill expands the definition of a publicly owned treatment  
          works (POTW) serving a small community, and provides an  
          additional alternative to imposition of mandatory minimum civil  
          penalties for water code violations (MMPs) on those POTWs.   
          Specifically, this bill:

          1)Expands the definition of a publicly owned treatment works to  
            include drinking water systems, whether publicly or privately  
            owned.

          2)Increases the population limit, from 10,000 to 20,000, that is  
            provided in the definition of a publicly owned water facility  
            serving a "small community."

          3)Allows a public water system, school and other local  
            government facility in a small community to apply funds from  
            mandatory minimum civil penalties for MMPs to remediation  
            actions at the facility that committed the water code  
            violation, subject to approval by the State Water Resources  
            Control Board (SWRCB) or the Regional Water Quality Control  
            Board (RWQCB).

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Minor, absorbable costs to SWRCB or the RWQCB. 

           COMMENTS  

           1)Rationale.   According to the author, this bill is necessary  
            because fees and penalties for violations of the water code  








                                                                  AB 914
                                                                  Page  2

            are oftentimes so costly that they prevent small communities  
            from undertaking actions that would bring about compliance.   
            This bill would continue the practice of monetary penalties  
            for violations of the water code.  However, it would allow  
            small communities to use the penalty amounts for compliance  
            with the water code.

            Additionally, and consistent with public recommendations made  
            by SWRCB, the author contends the definition of "small  
            community" as one with no more than 20,000 persons more  
            accurately reflects the type of communities that the author  
            seek to assist with this bill.

           2)Background.   The Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act authorizes  
            SWRCB and RWQCB to set waste discharge requirements and  
            establishes MMP of $3,000 for each serious waste discharge  
            violation.  This may be in addition to other penalties and  
            fees.  
           
            The act additionally provides that publicly owned treatment  
            works that serve a small (no more than 10,000 residents) or  
            low-income rural community may apply the amount of penalty to  
            completion of a compliance project to remedy the waste  
            discharge violation.
           
          3)Related legislation:
             
             a)   AB 24 (Gilmore) 2009 contains provisions allowing for  
               larger communities to qualify for the allocation of penalty  
               funds to making corrective actions at small community  
               POTWs.  This bill is awaiting action in the ESTM Committee.  
                
             b)   AB 913 (Logue) 2009 contains provisions setting a  
               12-month time period on SWRCB and RWQCB actions.  This bill  
               is awaiting action in the ESTM Committee.

             c)   SB 514 (Aanestad) 2009, contains provisions setting a  
               12-month time period on SWRCB and RWQCB actions.  This bill  
               is awaiting action in the Senate.

           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081