BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1006
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 1006 (Buchanan)
          As Amended  June 1, 2009
          Majority vote 

           BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS     9-2  APPROPRIATIONS      12-4        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Hayashi, Emmerson, Eng,   |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano,         |
          |     |Hernandez, Nava, John A.  |     |Charles Calderon, Davis,  |
          |     |Perez,                    |     |Fuentes,                  |
          |     |Price, Ruskin, Smyth      |     |Hall, John A. Perez,      |
          |     |                          |     |Price, Skinner,           |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio, Torlakson,       |
          |     |                          |     |Krekorian                 |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Conway, Niello            |Nays:|Nielsen, Duvall, Harkey,  |
          |     |                          |     |Miller                    |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           SUMMARY  :  Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to  
          consider specified factors in selecting a location for the  
          lease, lease with the option to purchase, construction, or  
          purchase of a state building in excess of 10,000 square feet.   
          Specifically,  this bill  requires consideration of the: 

          1)Location of the community or population served by the state  
            building.

          2)Residential location of the workforce to be housed in the  
            building, with priority given to the locations that  
            demonstrate the highest reduction of miles traveled by its  
            workforce. 

          3)Availability and proximity of high quality and frequent  
            transit service, including regularly operated bus lines that  
            are operational at the time a state agency occupies the  
            building. 

           EXISTING LAW  : 

          1)Requires DGS to prepare plans and specifications for any  
            public building constructed pursuant to the State Building  








                                                                  AB 1006
                                                                  Page  2


            Construction Act of 1955, which generally sets forth  
            procedures for the acquisition and construction of state  
            buildings.

          2)States that the "Capitol Area Plan" is the official state  
            master plan for development in the central city of Sacramento  
            for the location of state buildings and other improvements.   
            The Plan serves as a guide for future state policy in the  
            location of state buildings and other facilities in the  
            metropolitan area.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, DGS indicates that, on behalf of state departments,  
          it enters into about 100 leases for new space each year, and  
          that most of these leases are for less than 10,000 square feet.   
          For the additional location analysis required by this bill, DGS  
          would incur only minor additional costs.  

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author's office, "The present law  
          does not establish clear guidelines for the selection and  
          location of state buildings that support AB 32 and SB 375 goals.  
           This bill, AB 1006, would empower the State of California to  
          lead by example by locating state office buildings close to  
          where the state workforce lives."

          Currently, the DGS has numerous statutes and mandates to comply  
          with on the selection of state buildings.  Executive Order  
          D-46-01 ordered that sound and smart growth patterns shall  
          receive maximum support consistent with the foregoing state  
          priorities, including the following considerations: 

          1)Preferred siting or leasing in a central city or area of  
            similar character immediately adjacent thereto;

          2)Construction or renovation of state-owned office buildings  
            with site plans and architectural designs of the highest  
            quality;

          3)Sensitivity to building design and scale and environmental  
            concerns;

          4)Proximity to public transit and other needed infrastructure;

          5)Proximity to affordable and available housing;








                                                                  AB 1006
                                                                  Page  3



          6)Pedestrian access to retail and commercial facilities, and  
            exploiting opportunities for mixed use; 

          7)Indications of the need for neighborhood economic  
            revitalization;

          8)Opportunities to utilize structures of historic, cultural or  
            architectural significance;

          9)Communication with residents, property owners and businesses  
            regarding local concerns; and, 

          10)Advice and recommendations of local elected officials and  
            their staff with consideration to any incentives offered by  
            local government.

          According to the City of Elk Grove, it is the second largest  
          city in Sacramento County with a population of 140,000  
          residents.  There are 12,625 Elk Grove residents that are state  
          government workers, and 76.9% of those workers, which equals  
          nearly 10,000 cars, drive to work alone.  The remaining 12.7% of  
          state workers residing in Elk Grove carpool.  The resulting  
          impact of these motorists is an average annual commute of 7,195  
          miles per vehicle, totaling 90,836,875 miles for the entire  
          population. 


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Joanna Gin / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301 

                                                                FN: 0001329