BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    





                                                                 AB 1006

                                                                 Page  1


         GOVERNOR'S VETO
         AB 1006 (Buchanan)
         As Amended  June 1, 2009
         2/3 vote

          BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS     9-2                APPROPRIATIONS 12-4
          
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
         |Ayes:|Hayashi, Emmerson, Eng,   |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano,         |
         |     |Hernandez, Nava, John A.  |     |Charles Calderon, Davis,  |
         |     |Perez,                    |     |Fuentes,                  |
         |     |Price, Ruskin, Smyth      |     |Hall, John A. Perez,      |
         |     |                          |     |Price, Skinner,           |
         |     |                          |     |Solorio, Torlakson,       |
         |     |                          |     |Krekorian                 |
         |     |                          |     |                          |
         |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
         |Nays:|Conway, Niello            |Nays:|Nielsen, Duvall, Harkey,  |
         |     |                          |     |Miller                    |
          ----------------------------------------------------------------- 


          ASSEMBLY:       62-15           (June 2, 2009)    SENATE:        
         23-10(September 1, 2009)        

          
          SUMMARY  :  Requires the Department of General Services (DGS) to  
         consider specified factors in selecting a location for the lease,  
         lease with the option to purchase, construction, or purchase of a  
         state building in excess of 10,000 square feet.  Specifically,  
          this bill  requires consideration of the: 

         1)Location of the community or population served by the state  
           building.

         2)Residential location of the workforce to be housed in the  
           building, with priority given to the locations that demonstrate  
           the highest reduction of miles traveled by its workforce. 

         3)Availability and proximity of high quality and frequent transit  
           service, including regularly operated bus lines that are  
           operational at the time a state agency occupies the building. 









                                                                 AB 1006

                                                                 Page  2



          EXISTING LAW : 

         1)Requires DGS to prepare plans and specifications for any public  
           building constructed pursuant to the State Building Construction  
           Act of 1955, which generally sets forth procedures for the  
           acquisition and construction of state buildings.

         2)States that the "Capitol Area Plan" is the official state master  
           plan for development in the central city of Sacramento for the  
           location of state buildings and other improvements.  The Plan  
           serves as a guide for future state policy in the location of  
           state buildings and other facilities in the metropolitan area.

          FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
         Committee, DGS indicates that, on behalf of state departments, it  
         enters into about 100 leases for new space each year, and that  
         most of these leases are for less than 10,000 square feet.  For  
         the additional location analysis required by this bill, DGS would  
         incur only minor additional costs.  

          COMMENTS  :  According to the author's office, "The present law does  
         not establish clear guidelines for the selection and location of  
         state buildings that support AB 32 and SB 375 goals.  This bill,  
         AB 1006, would empower the State of California to lead by example  
         by locating state office buildings close to where the state  
         workforce lives."
         Currently, the DGS has numerous statutes and mandates to comply  
         with on the selection of state buildings.  Executive Order D-46-01  
         ordered that sound and smart growth patterns shall receive maximum  
         support consistent with the foregoing state priorities, including  
         the following considerations: 

         1)Preferred siting or leasing in a central city or area of similar  
           character immediately adjacent thereto;

         2)Construction or renovation of state-owned office buildings with  
           site plans and architectural designs of the highest quality;

         3)Sensitivity to building design and scale and environmental  
           concerns;










                                                                 AB 1006

                                                                 Page  3


         4)Proximity to public transit and other needed infrastructure;

         5)Proximity to affordable and available housing;

         6)Pedestrian access to retail and commercial facilities, and  
           exploiting opportunities for mixed use; 

         7)Indications of the need for neighborhood economic  
           revitalization;

         8)Opportunities to utilize structures of historic, cultural or  
           architectural significance;

         9)Communication with residents, property owners and businesses  
           regarding local concerns; and, 

         10)Advice and recommendations of local elected officials and their  
           staff with consideration to any incentives offered by local  
           government.

         According to the City of Elk Grove, it is the second largest city  
         in Sacramento County with a population of 140,000 residents.   
         There are 12,625 Elk Grove residents that are state government  
         workers, and 76.9% of those workers, which equals nearly 10,000  
         cars, drive to work alone.  The remaining 12.7% of state workers  
         residing in Elk Grove carpool.  The resulting impact of these  
         motorists is an average annual commute of 7,195 miles per vehicle,  
         totaling 90,836,875 miles for the entire population. 
          
         GOVERNOR'S VETO MESSAGE  :

         "This bill requires the state to consider the residential location  
         of the workforce to be housed in the building, giving a priority  
         to areas that can demonstrate the highest reduction of miles  
         traveled by its workforce.  This bill is unnecessary, as the  
         Department of General Services already considers a number of  
         factors when considering where to locate a building.  Further, I  
         believe the highest priority for locating state buildings is, and  
         should remain, the ability to provide services to the citizens of  
         California."











                                                                 AB 1006

                                                                 Page  4


          Analysis Prepared by  :    Joanna Gin / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301 

                                                                 FN: 0003315