BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1111
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 20, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                   AB 1111 (Blakeslee) - As Amended:  May 13, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Utilities and  
          Commerce     Vote:                            14-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:               

           SUMMARY  

          This bill:

          1)Expands the types of projects for which the California  
            Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing  
            Authority (CAEATFA) may authorize a sales tax exclusion to  
            encompass sales lease-back arrangements involving facilities  
            and equipment used to manufacture renewable energy components.

          2)Requires CAEATFA, in approving projects for the sale and use  
            tax exclusion pursuant to its current authority, to consider  
            the extent to which:

             a)   The benefit to the state from the project exceeds or  
               equals the recipient's benefit of the exclusion.
             b)   The project will create new, permanent jobs in the  
               state.
             c)   The project is consistent with local and state planning.
             d)   The project will produce quantifiable greenhouse gas  
               emissions.

          3)Requires the authority, once the exclusions provided exceed  
            $100 million annually, to provide the Legislature a 20-day  
            notice of additional approvals.

          FISCAL EFFECT  

          Because the bill broadens the definition of "project," for  
          purposes of approving and providing the sales and use tax  
          exclusion, there could be significant state and local revenue  
          losses.  The extent of such losses would depend on the number of  








                                                                  AB 1111
                                                                  Page  2

          new projects approved by the CAEATFA pursuant to this bill and  
          the dollar amount of machinery, equipment or other property  
          sold, leased or transferred.  For every $100 million in  
          exclusions provided, state revenues losses would total $6.25  
          million and local revenue losses would total $2.75 million.  To  
          the extent the exclusions provided from this bill result in  
          economic activity in California that would not otherwise occur,  
          the state and local governments could realize some offsetting  
          revenue gains.

           COMMENTS  

           Background and Purpose  .  CAEATFA was created in 1980 with an  
          authorization of $200 million in revenue bonds to finance  
          projects that utilize alternative sources of energy, such as  
          cogeneration, wind, and geothermal power.  It was renamed in  
          1994 as the California Alternative Energy and Advanced  
          Transportation Financing Authority and its charge was expanded  
          to include the financing of "advanced transportation"  
          technologies.  During the energy crisis of 2001, the CAEATFA's  
          authority was expanded to provide financial assistance to public  
          power entities, independent generators, and others for new and  
          renewable energy sources, and to develop clean distributed  
          generation.  CAEATFA was given the authority last year to issue  
          electricity pre-payment bonds to finance the purchase of  
          renewable energy by state agencies and schools.


          The authority has $53 million of bonds outstanding, no bonds  
          unsold, and approximately $813.9 million in remaining bonding  
          capacity.  In addition to bonds, financial assistance from the  
          authority can include loans, loan guarantees, and credit  
          enhancement.  
            

          Existing law also permits CAEATFA to authorize companies to  
          enter into sales lease-back arrangements with the authority for  
          any authorized project, whereby the sales and leaseback of the  
          tangible personal property related to the project is exempt from  
          state and local sales and use taxes. 

          In a typical transaction involving the financing of equipment,  
          for example, the participating party, upon receiving project  
          approval from the authority, would purchase the equipment (and  
          other property meeting the statutory "project" definition)  








                                                                  AB 1111
                                                                  Page  3

          without payment of the sales tax, and then resell the equipment  
          to CAEATFA.  This transfer may be excluded from sales and use  
          taxes as a transfer from a participating party to CAEATFA.  The  
          applicant and CAEATFA then enter into a lease, whereby CAEATFA  
          transfers to the applicant the equipment.  (While normally a  
          lease involving tangible personal property is subject to sales  
          taxes, current law provides a specific sales tax exclusion for  
          lease-back arrangements between CAEATFA and the participating  
          party.) Upon complete installation of all the equipment,  
          ownership of the equipment is transferred from CAEATFA to the  
          participating party.  The transfer may also be excluded from  
          sales and use taxes under existing law. 

          The Public Resource Code currently defines "project" for  
          purposes of the sales tax exclusion to include any land,  
          construction or improvements to buildings, and acquisition of  
          personal property (such as machinery and equipment) that  uses  an  
          alternative energy source, or is used for the manufacturing of  
          advanced transportation technologies. This bill expands the  
          scope of "project" to include tangible personal property  
          purchased for the manufacturing of alternative energy  
          components. Thus, under existing law, a company wishing to  
          install solar panels may be authorized for the sales tax  
          exemption. This bill would also enable CAEATFA to authorize the  
          exemption for the plant and equipment needed to manufacture the  
          solar panels.



          This bill, sponsored by the State Treasurer, is intended to make  
          CAEATFA's financial assistance availability to entities that  
          produce the component parts of renewable energy and alternative  
          transportation products.  The sponsor also indicates that the  
          bill is intended to "set a clear, prudent, but adaptable  
          financial cap for a sales tax exemption program that would  
          include both manufacturers of advances transportation project  
          and manufacturers of components for production of renewable  
          energy."  (The bill does not actually impose any cap on  
          CAEATFA-approved sales tax exemptions, instead only requiring  
          that the Legislature be notified when the board is approving  
          exclusions exceeding $100 million in a year.)


          According to the author, the bill is intended to retain  
          companies and industries that are considering moving their  








                                                                  AB 1111
                                                                  Page  4

          operations from California in order to benefit from other  
          states' tax exemptions.  The author believes that California  
          currently lacks policies that support the production of the  
          innovative technologies being developed in-state.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081