BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1223|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1223
          Author:   Block (D), et al
          Amended:  6/10/10 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE  :  5-2, 6/23/10
          AYES:  Romero, Alquist, Liu, Price, Simitian
          NOES:  Huff, Emmerson
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Hancock, Wyland

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  44-26, 1/27/10 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Career Technical Education:  linked learning

           SOURCE  :     Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce


           DIGEST  :    This bill defines linked learning to mean  
          multiple pathway programs and authorizes the Commission on  
          Teacher Credentialing to convene a workgroup to develop  
          standards for programs that prepare candidates to teach in  
          linked learning programs.  

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law establishes the Commission on  
          Teacher Credentialing (CTC) and vests with the Commission  
          the power and duty to, among other things, establish  
          professional standards, assessments, and examinations for  
          entry and advancement in the education profession

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1223
                                                                Page  
          2

          Existing law defines multiple pathway programs as  
          multiyear, comprehensive high school programs of integrated  
          academic and technical study that are organized around a  
          broad theme, interest area, or industry sector, and provide  
          curriculum choices that prepare participating pupils for a  
          range of postsecondary options, including two and four-year  
          colleges, apprenticeships, and formal employment training.   
          Current law specifies that multiple pathway programs are  
          comprised, among other things, of an integrated core  
          curriculum that meets the eligibility requirements for  
          admission to the University of California and the  
          California State University and is delivered through  
          project-based learning and other engaging instructional  
          strategies.

          Existing law establishes the minimum requirements for  
          preliminary and clear teaching credentials for single  
          subjects and for designated subjects career technical  
          education (DSCTE).  

          Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public  
          Instruction (SPI) to develop, in conjunction with specified  
          entities, a report that explores the feasibility of  
          expanding and establishing multiple pathway programs; and  
          requires the report to include specified components,  
          including, but not limited to, methods for developing and  
          sharing models of integrated curriculum and instruction,  
          strategies for increasing the course options and  
          instructional time for pupils in high school, and  
          recommendations for supporting regional coalitions in  
          planning and developing the programs.  The SPI released  
          this report on May 12, 2010.  

          Existing law establishes California Partnership Academies  
          (CPAs) for the purpose of providing academic and  
          occupational training to high school students in grades  
          10-12 inclusive who present a high risk of dropping out of  
          school.  CPAs function as a school within a school and  
          provide career-themed educational programs that integrate  
          core academic content and technical education.  

          This bill:

          1. Defines linked learning as multiple pathway programs and  







                                                               AB 1223
                                                                Page  
          3

             specifies linked learning programs may include  
             California Partnership Academies.

          2. Authorizes the CTC to convene a workgroup to develop  
             standards for the issuance of a "recognition of study in  
             linked learning" statement that will recognize single  
             subject credential candidates who have been prepared to  
             teach linked learning programs.  Requires the workgroup  
             to include but not be limited to representatives from: 

             A.    The California Department of Education (CDE).

             B.    CTC-approved teacher preparation programs from  
                the California State University (CSU), University  
                of California, and independent institutions of  
                higher education.

             C.    The business community and local chambers of  
                commerce.
             School districts, county offices of education, and  
                charter schools that have implemented linked  
                learning programs.

             D.    Other organizations as deemed appropriate by the  
                CTC.

             E.    States the intent of the Legislature that  
                candidates for the recognition of study statement  
                demonstrate appropriate knowledge and competencies,  
                as specified. 

          3. Encourages the CSU and other teacher preparation  
             institutions to establish goals for increasing the  
             number of teachers prepared through linked learning  
             programs. 

          4. Encourages Beginning Teacher Support and Assessment  
             programs to provide appropriate support, mentoring, and  
             assistance to beginning teachers who are teaching in  
             linked learning programs.

          5. Authorizes the CTC and the SPI to gather and post on an  
             appropriate Internet Web site, best practices from  
             school districts and schools on curriculum development  







                                                               AB 1223
                                                                Page  
          4

             and professional development relating to implementing  
             and sustaining multiple pathway programs. 

          6. Specifies that an individual who has a recognition of  
             study in linked learning designation is not authorized  
             to teach subject matter content unless they hold an  
             appropriate authorization or are employed on the basis  
             of a legal assignment option.

          7. Makes findings and declarations pertaining to the  
             benefits of preparing pupils for academic and career  
             choices after high school and the value of preparing  
             teachers to learn pedagogical strategies used in linked  
             learning programs.

           Previous/Related Legislation

           AB 2172 (Carter), 2009-10 Session, requires the SPI to  
          convene an advisory group to review the recommendations of  
          the Multiple Pathway feasibility report and to advise on  
          the implementation of those recommendations.  This bill was  
          held by the Assembly Appropriations Committee.  

           AB 2445 (Furutani), 2009-10 Session, requires, until  
          December 31, 2015, the Superintendent to annually report to  
          the Legislature on the status of an advisory board AB 2172  
          would create.  This bill was held by the Assembly  
          Appropriations Committee.  

           AB 2648 (Bass, Carter & Furutani), Chapter 681, Statutes of  
          2008, requires the SPI to develop, in conjunction with  
          specified individuals, a report that explores the  
          feasibility of expanding and establishing career multiple  
          pathway programs.  Passed the Senate Floor with a vote of  
          26-9 on August 20, 2008.

          SB 974 (Steinberg), 2009-10 Session, establishes Career  
          Pathways Investment Credit beginning on or after January 1,  
          2011, to be administered by the California Tax Credit  
          Allocation Committee and to be allocated to local education  
          agencies (LEAs) for distribution to business entities that  
          enter into contracts or memoranda of understanding with  
          LEAs to provide career technical education through the  
          creation of career pathway programs.  Passes Senate Floor  







                                                               AB 1223
                                                                Page  
          5

          with a vote of 21 - 16 on June 3, 2010.

          SB 1677 (Scott), of 2007-08 Session, required the  
          Legislative Analyst's Office to convene an advisory  
          committee and make recommendations on the preparation and  
          professional development needs of both academic and career  
          technical teachers to deliver course content in ways that  
          mutually reinforce.  Passed the Senate Floor with a vote of  
          35-0 on May 1, 2008.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/2/10)

          California School Boards Association
          California State University
          Commission on Teacher Credentialing
          Contra Costa Council
          Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
          Los Angeles Unified School District
          Regional Economic Association Leaders of California
          San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce
          San Diego State University

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/2/10)

          California Agricultural Teachers Association
          California Business Education Association
          California Farm Bureau Federation 

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          a growing number of schools are providing students with  
          coursework and programs that integrate academic content and  
          technical education through project-based learning or  
          through career-themed learning opportunities.  These  
          programs often involve both academic teachers and technical  
          education teachers.  While the academic teachers who teach  
          in these programs possess the same essential teaching  
          skills and content knowledge as teachers who teach  
          traditional academic courses, researchers have found that  
          they also need skills and proficiencies not commonly taught  
          in a traditional teacher preparation program, such as  
          knowledge and ability to collaborate in the design and  







                                                               AB 1223
                                                                Page  
          6

          delivery of interdisciplinary, project-based curriculum;  
          knowledge and skills to create a curriculum that centers on  
          a business or industry sector; competency in developing and  
          maintaining partnerships with local industry and  
          postsecondary institutions; and knowledge about how to  
          incorporate work-based learning into the curriculum.  The  
          sponsor of this bill, the Los Angeles Area Chamber of  
          Commerce, hopes that the development of program standards  
          and the credential designation authorized by this bill will  
          help increase the pool of academic teachers who possess  
          skills and competencies for successful teaching in linked  
          learning programs.

          At least seven CSU campuses, including San Diego State  
          University have implemented or are in the process of  
          implementing a "linked learning lens" in their existing  
          teacher preparation programs.  While nothing in CTC's  
          existing standards for single subject credential programs  
          precludes institutions from incorporating the competencies  
          identified in this bill into their teacher preparation  
          programs, the author's office hopes this bill will lead to  
          greater uniformity across programs and provide guidance for  
          the development of new "linked learning lens" programs by  
          authorizing the CTC to develop standards for these training  
          programs.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California Farm Bureau  
          Federation is opposed to this bill and writes, "In light of  
          the fact that Career Technical Education (CTE) courses are  
          not required for high school students such as art, foreign  
          language and P.E. are and not included in accountability  
          measurements as the core academic disciplines are, we have  
          reached an historic low of CTE programs, enrollment and  
          teachers.

          In recent decades, public education in California has been  
          marked by the narrowing of curricular options for students  
          particularly in CTE. It is unfortunate for our students  
          that CTE programs and course offerings have been among the  
          first to be cut, it has become a troubling trend. In 1987,  
          three-quarters of students were enrolled in a CTE course at  
          their high school campus; this year, less than 29% are. The  
          CTE teacher pipeline in our universities has been  
          diminished with the idea that core academic instructors can  







                                                               AB 1223
                                                                Page  
          7

          teach vocational themes in the high schools. Most CTE  
          instructors specialize in their particular field and have  
          the experience and understanding from hands-on work that  
          cannot be readily learned or taught from a textbook. Farm  
          Bureau believes that Career Technical Education is a  
          valuable part of the educational experience and that  
          students given the opportunity to learn the practical  
          skills taught in CTE courses are better equipped to meet  
          the demands of the work world.

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles  
            Calderon, Chesbro, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, Eng, Evans,  
            Feuer, Fong, Fuentes, Furutani, Galgiani, Hayashi,  
            Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones, Lieu, Bonnie  
            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, John A. Perez,  
            Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Skinner, Solorio,  
            Swanson, Torres, Torrico, Yamada
          NOES:  Adams, Anderson, Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill,  
            Blakeslee, Conway, Cook, Emmerson, Fletcher, Fuller,  
            Gaines, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Harkey, Jeffries,  
            Knight, Logue, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, Silva, Smyth,  
            Audra Strickland, Tran, Villines
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Carter, De Leon, DeVore, Hall, Miller,  
            V. Manuel Perez, Torlakson, Bass


          PQ:do  8/3/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****